Manuscript Psy03-D@1 · Psy03-D-v1.tex · section · 3e18951d

Claim-to-certificate ledger

Claim-to-certificate ledger · lines 2772–2845

Back to manuscript
of the mathematical release.
ClaimStatusCertificate or boundary
ClaimStatusCertificate or boundary
Point history reveals the active hidden ruleExcluded under the printed interfaceInput-rule independence and stationary posterior.
The uncued optimum is ProvedContinuous symmetric point law and the four printed ID mappings.
Four IDs give four distinct functionsFalseIDs 1 and 2 implement the same function.
Every ID switch is behaviorally informativeFalseFunction equivalence and disagreement matrix.
Optimal accuracy proves rule adaptationFalseA memoryless -mapping attains the optimum.
Delayed cues and feedback test observable adaptationDeclared new protocolsTheir observation timing differs from the uncued task.
Repeated response identifies old-rule persistenceFalseAlternating old responses and constant-response counterexamples.
Corrected old-function fraction identifies an internal rule stateNot establishedIt certifies an observation-level response category only.
Trial count gives independent sample countNot generallyThe fresh sequence is the statistical block.
Ratios are certified without denominator controlExcludedPositive denominator lower bound required.
Five-trial success pattern proves recoveryNot establishedPattern, horizon, and censoring are separately recorded.
Masked inactive stored derivatives support regrowthFalse for the stated loss interfaceChain-rule mask factor.
Reopened mask restores a healthy weightConditionalRequires an independently preserved pre-pruning reference.
Score multiplier necessarily protects recurrenceFalse for the reported allocationsPer-tensor cancellation and global-division counterexample.
Interpolated outcome is an executed matchFalseSurrogate status and response assumptions required.
Isoacute equals iso-displacementFalseDifferent matching quantities and assessment designs.
Quantum processing recovers absent rule informationExcluded under the same observation lawCarrier-independent observation obstruction.
Finite cued quantum retention is exactProved pilotSpecified encoding, storage, and readout.
Clinical ranking, cognitive mechanism, or analytic admissionNot establishedNo empirical correspondence or inherited construction.