Manuscript Psy04-B@1 · Psy04-B-v1.tex · theorem · 62c2b6f0
Theorem: Sharp two-state classical bound
The sharp classical benchmark on the cut · lines 866–905 · proof included or linked
Psy04-B@1#thm:classical, Psy04-B@1#eq:classicalbound
Every admitted wholly classical cut with satisfies
The bound allows stochastic encoding, storage, decoding, and input-independent shared randomness. It is attained by a sequential one-bit encoder.
Proof. It suffices to consider deterministic tables. For memory value , let
An input encoded as has average success . The best encoder for fixed answer words chooses a closest word, giving
There are four input words and at most two distinct answer words. At least two input words are not answer words and each has distance at least one. The distance sum is therefore at least two.
For attainment, store when it arrives, ignore the later , answer query 1 correctly, and use a fixed answer for query 2. The score is
Displayed formulas in this passage
Psy04-B@1#eq:classicalbound · line 869
unlabeled · line 881
unlabeled · line 888
unlabeled · line 902
Nearby in this section
- section: The sharp classical benchmark on the cut
- lemma: Lemma: Deterministic-table reduction
- section: The sharp classical benchmark on the cut
- section: The sharp classical benchmark on the cut
- proposition: Proposition: Storage processing cannot improve a fixed classical encoder's optimum
- section: The sharp classical benchmark on the cut