Standing separations

• Finite-plane interpolation is not dense-TT representability. Dense-TT representability remains open in the programme considered here.

• The compact switch remains compact. No adiabatic limit $g\to 1$ is proved.

• No higher causal product, $T_2(\mathcal{V},\mathcal{V})$, stress–stress product, or graviton-loop calculation is constructed.

• The Newton–wave cubic is neither the external linear $R_{1,1}$ nor the oscillator mixed quadratic $R_{1,1}$. It is not identified with a later Einstein cubic.

• Equality of curvature or compact-current data does not imply equality of the cubic scalar response.

• No full Einstein–scalar linearization or consistently quantized gravitational observable is supplied.

III supplies a separate classical descent programme, with its own equation spaces and unconstructed sourced successor. IV supplies distinct represented models, including a scalar quadratic Model 3. Neither is a premise or an identification of the cubic form here CheungIII,CheungIV.

II's finite contact membership logic does not identify a counterterm class for the present currents CheungII. Oai282-A's finite Ward comparison and the separate OpenAI catalogue are documentary separation records only CheungOaiWard,OpenAIRecord. No OpenAI catalogue theorem is a premise or independently verified by this manuscript.

Hawk04–Hawk07 comparisons concern their separately declared access and recovery models CheungHawk. There is no Page curve, island, wormhole, interior, or holographic identification in the present laboratory.

The inherited analytic records distinguish an internal amplitude construction from the unresolved full joint characteristic map CheungAnalytic. The historical H2 stop in XIV-H is not a withdrawal of XIV-I's narrower I2 construction. Neither that construction nor the supported-sector reference of XIV-J is replaced by our finite readout.

The documentary standing boundaries for this release remain

\mathrm{O.1}=\texttt{\detokenize{NOT_CLOSED}},\qquad
 \text{XV-B quantum-admission exit: not opened},\qquad
 \text{XVI-N: not discharged}.

Existence of technical XV-B manuscripts is distinct from opening that admission exit. Differently scoped subsector reports are not silently upgraded to closure of the full inherited problem CheungStops.

The phrase “no quantum coefficient admitted” refers to that inherited characteristic target. It does not deny the explicit free-field and first-retarded constructions proved here. No solution of the nine standing programme problems is claimed.

Finally, no apparatus Hamiltonian, reset protocol, bath, work account, or heat ledger follows from the destructive channel. Consumption of names is not a thermodynamic calculation.