Manuscript V-B@1 · V-B-v1.tex · theorem · 3fadc1ad

Theorem: Exact admissibility criteria

Admissibility on the declared solution spaces › Raw and harmonic criteria · lines 727–776 · proof included or linked

V-B@1#thm:classification

Back to manuscript

For the fixed :

  1. is representable on if and only if , equivalently .

  2. Each of the following is equivalent to : representability of on ; representability of on ; and representability of .

  3. The latter condition is exactly the vanishing of the two Cauchy data in (eq:zetadata).

When the conditions hold, representatives are obtained from (eq:smoothing), using in (i) and in (ii).

Proof. Every compact conserved current annihilates every smooth pure gauge. In (i), all compact belong to , so representability forces for every compact . This is . The bulk and slice supports, and arbitrary first normal jets of slice tests, separate . The converse follows from Lemma lem:smooth and Theorem thm:smoothing.

For (ii), residual gauges with belong to all three tested spaces and are fixed by both prescriptions. They must be annihilated. Such annihilation is equivalent to : necessity follows by testing and using the skew-adjointness of ; sufficiency follows from with compact .

Assume . Compact integration by parts gives

For , use

On , the correction pairs to zero. Smoothing now gives one representative for all three named functionals. Finally, homogeneous-wave uniqueness proves (iii).

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 763

  • unlabeled · line 767

Nearby in this section