Manuscript VII-E@1 · VII-E.tex · section · b713cf3c

Operational ambition and limits

The closed observation problem › Operational ambition and limits · lines 316–340

Back to manuscript

Within the proposed model, a future gravitational update may inspect only its declared observable interface. Destroyed names, inaccessible carriers, and resource bookkeeping are not undeclared geometric source variables. This is an operational requirement for a later quantum–geometric composite, not a derivation of its dynamics.

In particular, the paper proves no gravitational field equation, continuum limit, curvature-convergence theorem, physical causal dominance, or interacting-product theorem. It does not evaluate a singular triangle graph or establish a distributional finite part for one. The short distributional dictionary in sec:dictionary contains conditional linear inference rules only.

The distinction is structural:

Likewise, a scheduled circuit past is not a physical light cone. A computational implementation requires an additional physical model before such identifications can be tested.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 332