Manuscript VII-G@1 · VII-G.tex · theorem · 54f561e8
Theorem: Spectator consistency for stochastic histories
Entangled spectators and complete controller blindness · lines 808–846 · proof included or linked
VII-G@1#thm:spectators, VII-G@1#eq:path-spectator
Under Assumption ass:blind and (eq:block-extension), extend every branch by . Then, for every finite history,
Consequently:
the complete geometric history distributions agree;
the reduced history–matter outputs agree;
on every supported history, the conditional original-matter reductions agree;
the nonselective spectator marginal is unchanged.
Proof. Apply Lemma lem:partial-trace to each map in (eq:path-block). This proves (eq:path-spectator) without normalizing any branch. Taking traces proves (i); taking the direct sum proves (ii); division by a common positive trace proves (iii).
For (iv), the sum of all branches of a one-step transition is trace preserving on each input label. Pair the spectator reduction with . Its expectation after the step is
Iteration proves nonselective invariance.
Displayed formulas in this passage
VII-G@1#eq:path-spectator · line 813
unlabeled · line 837
Nearby in this section
- section: Entangled spectators and complete controller blindness
- assumption: Assumption: Blindness of the complete transition specification
- section: Entangled spectators and complete controller blindness
- lemma: Lemma: Restriction of a selective map
- section: Entangled spectators and complete controller blindness
- example: Example: A capacity leak
- section: Entangled spectators and complete controller blindness
- remark: Remark: Selective spectator states