Manuscript VII-H@1 · VII-H.tex · section · d20d2a9f

Physical matching and the normalization ledger

Definition sheet for the quantum benchmark › Physical matching and the normalization ledger · lines 602–660

Back to manuscript

The following data are fixed throughout the benchmark.

DatumTreatment
Free equation and field normalization and the two-point function (eq:W); no mass or kinetic counterterm is compared
PreparationThe same Minkowski vacuum, not an arbitrary Hadamard state
Source and readoutThe same calibrated , , , and source sign
Ordering coordinatesPermitted only with the corresponding algebra and state transport
Coincident response normalizationA source-local contact convention, classified below
RegulatorAuxiliary; it must yield a limit satisfying the declared response axioms if it is used
Boundary conditionsNone are varied; introducing a reflecting wall changes the model

A multiplicative change of , a source rescaling, a new vacuum, or a mass shift is not a normalization convention in this comparison.

If a different normal-ordering representation writes as a Wick square plus a smooth c-number, that c-number must be included so that the same calibrated operator and state are represented. It is not legitimate to keep the changed symbol and call the resulting preparation unchanged. The distinction between product data and a physical state is also explicit in XII-A CheungXIIA.

The source-local contact freedom concerns the convention for coincident differentiated composite insertions. Formally, an addition

to a connected source-functional normalization has mixed second derivative . It does not change the free field equation or the zero-source composite.

If an apparatus calibration also fixes this coincident response, then is fixed and the admissible class becomes smaller. The invariant experiment constructed below remains valid in that smaller class. No equivalence of unmatched overlapping source/readout calibrations is claimed.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 647