Manuscript VII-J@1 · VII-J.tex · section · d8c01b04

Release, boundaries, and successor obligations

Release, boundaries, and successor obligations · lines 2078–2111

Back to manuscript

The result closes the requested causal-comparison problem for explicitly declared finite architectures. It does not close every possible simulation problem on the cone.

A continuum-field successor would additionally need a specified field algebra and state, local encoding of its admitted observables, a target propagator or evolution, a discretization error, and a physical detector model. The finite transport target here supplies none of those by analogy.

Likewise, this paper does not construct the separate characteristic quantum coefficient left open in the supplied XIV–XV material. Its causal network proofs do not define a missing distributional product, choose an extension, or supply a quantum Ward identity. No O.1 or quantum admission status is changed.

The distinction from gravitational dynamics is unchanged:

The cone metric, deficit, and worldline are inputs. No Lorentz invariance or spacetime emergence is derived from the schedule. No black-hole, recovery, Page-curve, or holographic claim is made.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 2102

Nearby in this section