Manuscript VII-J@1 · VII-J.tex · section · d8c01b04

The problem and the predecessor ledger

The problem and the predecessor ledger · lines 199–221

VII-J@1#eq:three

Back to manuscript

The central distinction is

The aim is to prove relations among these objects after defining each one, not to identify them by terminology.

The finite-channel conventions are standard Watrous. Operational causal notions require a stated intervention class; broader notions of influence need not agree in every probabilistic theory Perinotti. Circuit paths can overestimate the influence of a unitary transformation LorenzBarrett. We use an intervention-based notion throughout.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • VII-J@1#eq:three · line 203