Manuscript VII-J@1 · VII-J.tex · theorem · d8c01b04

Theorem: Exact no-signalling criterion

Finite channels and operational influence › Admissible interventions · lines 373–417 · proof included or linked

VII-J@1#thm:nosignal

Back to manuscript

The following are equivalent:

  1. ;

  2. there is a channel with

The factorization implies equality with every untouched reference.

Proof. Factorization implies (i), since a local trace-preserving intervention leaves the reduction unchanged.

Suppose (i) holds. Compare the identity intervention with the replacement channel

With no reference, equality for every input state gives equality of the corresponding linear maps:

Define

This is CPTP and gives (ii).

Taking adjoints proves (ii) implies (iii). Conversely, (iii) makes the output expectation depend only on the reduction. The same replacement construction gives (ii). Tensoring the factorization with proves the final assertion.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 380

  • unlabeled · line 384

  • unlabeled · line 398

  • unlabeled · line 403

  • unlabeled · line 407

Nearby in this section