Manuscript VII-J@1 · VII-J.tex · theorem · d8c01b04
Theorem: Exact no-signalling criterion
Finite channels and operational influence › Admissible interventions · lines 373–417 · proof included or linked
VII-J@1#thm:nosignal
The following are equivalent:
;
there is a channel with
The factorization implies equality with every untouched reference.
Proof. Factorization implies (i), since a local trace-preserving intervention leaves the reduction unchanged.
Suppose (i) holds. Compare the identity intervention with the replacement channel
With no reference, equality for every input state gives equality of the corresponding linear maps:
Define
This is CPTP and gives (ii).
Taking adjoints proves (ii) implies (iii). Conversely, (iii) makes the output expectation depend only on the reduction. The same replacement construction gives (ii). Tensoring the factorization with proves the final assertion.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 380
unlabeled · line 384
unlabeled · line 398
unlabeled · line 403
unlabeled · line 407