Manuscript VIII-A@3 · VIII-A-v3.tex · section · 2398a747
Relationship to companion manuscripts
Introduction and scope › Relationship to companion manuscripts · lines 194–244
The observation-boundary and residual-instrument questions are compared with Cheung's VII-E CheungVIIE. The fixed three-to-six slicing is compared with VII-F CheungVIIF. Every identity needed in this paper is proved here.
The recovery distinctions are compared with Oai280-C and Hawk04-B CheungOai280C,CheungHawk04B; they do not add a decoder to the geometric interface. VIII-B and VIII-C are separate sourced-realization and composition projects CheungVIIIB,CheungVIIIC. Their theorems are not imported.
Companion identifiers distinguish models and documentary relationships. Similar terminology does not identify their equation spaces, observable algebras, channels, cutoffs, or geometric dictionaries.
| Object | Status in this paper |
|---|---|
| Finite spinless matching contract | Defined, with realization prerequisites |
| A1–A3 | Proved under their explicit hypotheses |
| Fixed- family and unique incidence event | Constructed and certified locally |
| Instrument residual obstruction | Proved locally |
| Spectator and restricted deferred comparisons | Proved for the declared interfaces |
| Stale-deficit and time-shifted proposals | Rejected by explicit calculations |
| Variable-deficit sourced constructor | Not constructed here; separate VIII-B object |
| Canonical polygon flow or a hybrid history | Not constructed here; separate VIII-C objects |
| Mixed incidence–deficit germ | Not certified |
| Quantum characteristic coefficient or field source | Not constructed or admitted |
| Holographic reconstruction or spacetime emergence | Not claimed |