Manuscript X-A@1 · X-A.tex · proposition · dc7f5c0a

Proposition: Explicit edge-zone defect

Regulator preflight › Edge-zone failure: the boundary of the freeze · lines 1014–1075 · proof included or linked

X-A@1#prop:edge, X-A@1#eq:edgegap

Back to manuscript

Let be nonnegative and not identically zero, let with , and let , that is and . Then for every ,

Consequently . Moreover, with , there are a smooth and an with . This is not in .

Proof. The source is smooth and compactly supported, so has compact spatial support on each slice and the spatial integrals , are smooth in . Integrating the coefficient equation over space, the Laplacian term and spatial divergences drop out:

From , using , , and the vanishing of integrated spatial derivatives,

Hence . Both and vanish at , so and . For , , and for ,

while for . The integral is strictly positive because on and is not identically zero. This proves (eq:edgegap).

On the function solves the homogeneous wave equation and has nonzero spatial integral, so at some . Take ; then near that point, and a nonnegative bump supported where has fixed sign gives a nonzero smeared value. A free Klein–Gordon solution with at a point where works as well. Finally is disjoint from .

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • X-A@1#eq:edgegap · line 1021

  • unlabeled · line 1041

  • unlabeled · line 1048

  • unlabeled · line 1058

Nearby in this section