Manuscript X-B-ST@1 · X-B-ST.tex · proposition · d03c150c
Proposition: Pure-gauge diagnostic and the order boundary
The mixed term, second-order boundary, and diagnostics › What is missing at second dynamical order · lines 1458–1504 · proof included or linked
X-B-ST@1#prop:puregauge, X-B-ST@1#eq:puregaugeremainder
Let , and take the complete two-jet
Then in the degree-one free sector,
Consequently the incomplete second coefficient in (eq:truncation) is
which need not vanish.
Proof. The inherited laws give and . Hence the bare second coefficient is . Theorem thm:ward, compared with , gives the first identity. Applying
to gives , which is the stated integral.
For nonvanishing, in the massless case choose compactly supported in , with somewhere. Choose an admissible observation test supported in a small region where it has fixed sign. Against the smooth free solution , , so the pairing is nonzero. This diagnostic applies when those observation choices are made; it is not a nonvanishing assertion for every previously fixed test.
Displayed formulas in this passage
X-B-ST@1#eq:puregaugeremainder · line 1473
unlabeled · line 1461
unlabeled · line 1465
unlabeled · line 1487