Manuscript X-B-ST@1 · X-B-ST.tex · proposition · d03c150c

Proposition: Pure-gauge diagnostic and the order boundary

The mixed term, second-order boundary, and diagnostics › What is missing at second dynamical order · lines 1458–1504 · proof included or linked

X-B-ST@1#prop:puregauge, X-B-ST@1#eq:puregaugeremainder

Back to manuscript

Let , and take the complete two-jet

Then in the degree-one free sector,

Consequently the incomplete second coefficient in (eq:truncation) is

which need not vanish.

Proof. The inherited laws give and . Hence the bare second coefficient is . Theorem thm:ward, compared with , gives the first identity. Applying

to gives , which is the stated integral.

For nonvanishing, in the massless case choose compactly supported in , with somewhere. Choose an admissible observation test supported in a small region where it has fixed sign. Against the smooth free solution , , so the pairing is nonzero. This diagnostic applies when those observation choices are made; it is not a nonvanishing assertion for every previously fixed test.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • X-B-ST@1#eq:puregaugeremainder · line 1473

  • unlabeled · line 1461

  • unlabeled · line 1465

  • unlabeled · line 1487

Nearby in this section