Manuscript X-B-ii@1 · X-B-ii-v1.tex · remark · f1377602

Remark: Where the boundary lies

C2: the one-contraction boundary › What a family would require, and why the sheet stops · lines 752–761

Back to manuscript

The boundary is not at itself, which is a well-defined distribution and a fundamental solution up to the factor (Lemma lem:DF(ii)); it is at the first pointwise product of with itself, i.e.\ at the first pair of entries both of field degree at least two. X-B's wording “it does not constitute a claimed family of time-ordered maps” is therefore exact. No statement of this section asserts that such a family does not exist; it asserts that the sheet does not define one.

Nearby in this section