Manuscript X-D-ST@1 · X-D-ST.tex · proposition · e0cf8fdb

Proposition: A possible jump, but no hypersurface delta

Identification: continuous coordinates and normal flux › The smeared linear background kernel · lines 1278–1334 · proof included or linked

X-D-ST@1#prop:kernel, X-D-ST@1#eq:sharp-kernel

Back to manuscript

For a compact smooth covector test supported in the open slab, set . Then

Thus the observation-smeared linear background kernel is

It is compactly supported, smooth on each side of , and locally bounded. It can jump at , but it has no hypersurface-delta summand.

The finite-width kernels satisfy

Proof. For positive width, Green transposition and compact integration by parts give

The source is past-trivial and the ramp is flat at zero, so there is no initial boundary term. The advanced solution vanishes after the observation source.

After restricting to , its advanced support has a compact truncated causal past. The kernel difference is bounded and supported in a layer of thickness , with one fixed compact spatial reserve. This proves the estimate. Theorem thm:convergence, applied to the coordinate pairing, and dominated convergence then give (eq:sharp-kernel).

The limiting kernel is an explicitly locally integrable function. Its formula has a step, not a surface delta.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • X-D-ST@1#eq:sharp-kernel · line 1283

  • unlabeled · line 1309

  • unlabeled · line 1290

  • unlabeled · line 1298

Nearby in this section