Manuscript X-D@3 · X-D-v3.tex · lemma · b7774529

Lemma: Rescaled layer, exit data, and profile independence

D2: normal-flux estimate and the profile lemma › Application to the two coordinate coefficients · lines 765–849 · proof included or linked

X-D@3#lem:profile, X-D@3#eq:rescaled, X-D@3#eq:velocities, X-D@3#eq:ramp-terms

Back to manuscript

Write

Uniformly for , in every local spatial seminorm,

The exit positions tend to zero, and the exit velocities tend to

The limiting data depend only on the profile endpoints.

Proof. Replace the smooth coefficients at by their initial traces in (eq:first-layer)–(eq:second-layer). The error is . Integrating the velocities gives the position formulas.

To display every ramp-derivative contribution, the expanded sources are

The first equation implies

The singular part of the second source is therefore

One quadratic contribution comes from ; the other comes from . Their integrals each give half of the quadratic velocity:

Their sum agrees with the exact flux calculation. Discarding either term gives an incorrect exit velocity.

The moments multiply in the exit positions. Other profile-dependent moments similarly occur in remainders, not in (eq:velocities).

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • X-D@3#eq:rescaled · line 773

  • X-D@3#eq:velocities · line 790

  • X-D@3#eq:ramp-terms · line 807

  • unlabeled · line 768

  • unlabeled · line 824

  • unlabeled · line 829

  • unlabeled · line 839

Nearby in this section