Manuscript X-D@3 · X-D-v3.tex · lemma · b7774529
Lemma: Rescaled layer, exit data, and profile independence
D2: normal-flux estimate and the profile lemma › Application to the two coordinate coefficients · lines 765–849 · proof included or linked
X-D@3#lem:profile, X-D@3#eq:rescaled, X-D@3#eq:velocities, X-D@3#eq:ramp-terms
Write
Uniformly for , in every local spatial seminorm,
The exit positions tend to zero, and the exit velocities tend to
The limiting data depend only on the profile endpoints.
Proof. Replace the smooth coefficients at by their initial traces in (eq:first-layer)–(eq:second-layer). The error is . Integrating the velocities gives the position formulas.
To display every ramp-derivative contribution, the expanded sources are
The first equation implies
The singular part of the second source is therefore
One quadratic contribution comes from ; the other comes from . Their integrals each give half of the quadratic velocity:
Their sum agrees with the exact flux calculation. Discarding either term gives an incorrect exit velocity.
The moments multiply in the exit positions. Other profile-dependent moments similarly occur in remainders, not in (eq:velocities).
Displayed formulas in this passage
X-D@3#eq:rescaled · line 773
X-D@3#eq:velocities · line 790
X-D@3#eq:ramp-terms · line 807
unlabeled · line 768
unlabeled · line 824
unlabeled · line 829
unlabeled · line 839