Manuscript XI-C@1 · XI-C.tex · proposition · acec1422

Proposition: The defect is not generally an equation zero

The background order boundary on a named candidate › A nonzero defect on free configurations · lines 1093–1154 · proof included or linked

XI-C@1#prop:defectwitness

Back to manuscript

There are admissible plateau data and smooth free multiplet configurations for which . Therefore this classical defect does not belong to the ideal of functionals vanishing on all free configurations.

Proof. Take and the free tensor and scalar

They satisfy and . Set and the ghosts to zero; these choices satisfy the auxiliary free equations.

Choose a nonnegative nonzero . On a sufficiently large causal cylinder let , with a compact spatial cutoff outside the observation dependence region. Choose and near its support, and observe after the support of . All calculations in that region are unaffected by the cutoff, by finite propagation.

Put . Its components there are

Consequently

There is no layer contribution, and

Direct differentiation gives

and its scalar retarded response is

Thus the completed first coefficient has density

A nonnegative nonzero in the described observation region gives a strictly positive pairing. An equation-ideal functional would vanish on these free configurations, proving the assertion.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 1104

  • unlabeled · line 1121

  • unlabeled · line 1125

  • unlabeled · line 1131

  • unlabeled · line 1136

  • unlabeled · line 1140

  • unlabeled · line 1145

Nearby in this section