Manuscript XI-G@1 · XI-G.tex · lemma · f029bbcd

Lemma: Reduction to one kernel

The question, written so it cannot collapse · lines 591–614 · proof included or linked

XI-G@1#lem:reduction

Back to manuscript

If satisfies , then meets . Conversely, if satisfies (eq:mc), then and .

Proof. Restrict to configurations in with , which is allowed since zero is a free ghost; has no ghost dependence, so the ghost-free part of already reproduces it. On , substitute in every -slot: each kernel becomes , compact, with wavefront set not enlarged by a differential operator Hormander ((8.1.11)), hence still satisfying (eq:mc). The shell is a linear space closed under the independent scalings , ; comparing the coefficient of isolates a single symmetric kernel of slot type with on the shell. Polarization gives . The converse is Definition def:domain.

Nearby in this section