Manuscript XI-G@1 · XI-G.tex · section · f029bbcd

Six corrections to the production sheet

Scope, the four gates, and the corrections › Six corrections to the production sheet · lines 334–372

Back to manuscript
  1. The sheet proposed the Cauchy pairing as the remainder to be tested. The class invariant is the trisolution ; bulk equation terms are exactly the kernel of the map on compact kernels (Lemma lem:kernel). is the leading onset coefficient of in the counter-propagating null directions (Proposition prop:planewave), not the invariant itself.

  2. The sheet expected the forbidden covector of the class to be at . Pairings with solutions see only null covectors (Lemma lem:transport). The conormal is the sum of two co-oriented null covectors, one per metric slot; that pair is what every representative inherits (Corollary cor:covector).

  3. The witness is a pair of exact null plane waves on the gauge-fixed shell, not a Cauchy-data expansion. The tools are XI-F's (Definition 8.1.2, Proposition 8.1.3, Theorem 8.2.12 of Hormander) together with Theorems 8.2.4, 8.2.9, 8.2.13 and 8.3.1. No restriction theorem to is used.

  4. Transverse plane-wave pairs, which lie on the Einstein shell , do not detect XI-F's data: the Bianchi identity makes the leading symbol conserved, and the total covector annihilates its -components (Remark rem:einstein). The detecting polarization is pure trace, , which is on XI-E's gauge-fixed shell and off the Einstein shell.

  5. XI-F's one-slot rewriting of a boundary trace as a bulk functional is the case of the kernel lemma (Corollary cor:oneslot). It is a corollary of G2, not the two-slot proof.

  6. The constructed branch of G3 is characterized by an iff criterion on (Theorem thm:criterion) but is not instantiated: the criterion fails for XI-F's data (Theorem thm:obstruction), and for all data whose boundary trace of pairs nontrivially with the counter-propagating symbol (Proposition prop:general).