Manuscript XII-A@2 · XII-A-v2.tex · section · 955d4b22
Explicit predecessor input
Robust observation exclusion › Explicit predecessor input · lines 1550–1622
XII-A@2#eq:detector, XII-A@2#input:XIG
The cubic response is the frozen XI-F/XI-G functional, not an element already admitted to . Write its polarized kernel as . For the detector, the frozen source normalization can be written
The label records the frozen predecessor data. The source is smooth and compact; no cubic source is multiplied by a new ramp in this revision.
For a free scalar , unit , and , set
Define
For the frozen admissible predecessor data:
If , , , where , and on , then . XI-G's scalar witness gives with . Such observations exist for every frozen admissible and .
If , no satisfies
Equivalently the shell class of the polarized cubic kernel has no microcausal polynomial representative.
This is the observation-qualified obstruction and reduction theorem of XI-G XIG; its proof is an external input. No sign of is needed here.
The wave-propagator criterion is compatible with the cone convention: its primed bicharacteristic relation transports covectors with their causal character and time orientation preserved. In Minkowski coordinates they are the same transported covectors. Thus a forbidden causal tuple in the wavefront set of the trisolution must pull back to a forbidden source tuple. This establishes the necessary cone-preservation implication; it does not evaluate the criterion for undetected observations.
Displayed formulas in this passage
XII-A@2#eq:detector · line 1569
unlabeled · line 1556
unlabeled · line 1581
unlabeled · line 1602