Manuscript XII-E@1 · XII-E.tex · lemma · 9471ea56

Lemma: Tree composition

E5: carrier check of the assembled coefficient › A tree-composition lemma · lines 1067–1113 · proof included or linked

XII-E@1#lem:tree

Back to manuscript

Under (S), the product exists in and is compactly supported. Every point of has covectors for some , where according to the orientation of at . The pushforward satisfies

Proof. Pull each back to along the projection to ; its wavefront set consists of tuples with at the endpoints of and zero elsewhere Hormander (Theorem 8.2.4). Order the lines and let be the product of the weights and the first lines. Claim: , the set of nonzero tuples of the form . For this is empty. Suppose it holds for . The product is defined if there is no with Hormander (Theorem 8.2.10). Such a pair would give an assignment , with the line covector, satisfying at every vertex . The subgraph formed by is a forest. In a forest with at least one line there is a vertex of degree one; its unique line has zero covector; remove it and repeat. Hence all , contradicting . So the product exists and, by the same theorem, its wavefront set lies in the sums of the two wavefront sets with zero allowed, which is . Smooth weights do not enlarge wavefront sets. This proves the claim for and the covector description.

The support of lies in , compact by (S), so the projection to is proper on it and Hormander (Theorem 8.2.12). A point of with zero covectors at all internal vertices is a line assignment balanced at every internal vertex. Then . Hence .

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 1076

Nearby in this section