Manuscript XIII-A@1 · XIII-A.tex · theorem · f56e91c7

Theorem: Failure of coefficientwise ordering preservation

A4: ordering acts on functionals · lines 1238–1274 · proof included or linked

XIII-A@1#thm:ordering, XIII-A@1#eq:ordering-square

Back to manuscript

For the admissible difference (eq:rankone),

Consequently

The corresponding descended vanishing subspaces are not preserved by either.

Proof. Let be its field-independent linear derivative kernel. Then

The factor in (eq:ordering-map) cancels the factor . A second self-contraction would require a fourth derivative, which is zero. This proves (eq:ordering-square) exactly, not merely to first order.

Although vanishes on , the coefficient of its transport is the nonzero constant . Coefficientwise vanishing therefore fails. On-shell descent gives the same conclusion because that constant is not in .

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • XIII-A@1#eq:ordering-square · line 1241

  • unlabeled · line 1249

  • unlabeled · line 1260

Nearby in this section