Manuscript XIV-I@1 · XIV-I.tex · section · 29df501d

Both internal placements of K 5

I0: copied inputs and the exact predecessor stop › Both internal placements of K 5 · lines 1811–1896

XIV-I@1#sec:decision, XIV-I@1#thm:release

Back to manuscript

No , , , or is applied to the absent coefficient. No Ward defect is formed.

and exact release

GateEnding in XIV-IXV-B consequence
I0–I1Frozen inputs and routeNo exit. No model or ambiguity change.
I2Constructed internal amplitude mapBoth placements, exact fixed pole, uniform distributional estimates, finite remainder, and internal wavefront bounds. Opens I3 only.
I3UnresolvedCommon precomposition sum exists; the joint characteristic operator map is missing. No exit.
I4Not enteredNo joint section with complete remainder and no prescription.
I5Not enteredJ3–J5 not discharged for a joint distribution.
I6Not ConstructedNo admitted in . XV-B may not open.

For the unchanged frozen pair and the route fixed in I1:

  1. the fixed internal retarded multiplier has the exact pole decomposition (eq:pole);

  2. the finite amplitude module has the uniform estimates, continuous reconstruction, and exact lower-degree remainder proved in Section sec:amplitudespace;

  3. both placements have the amplitude maps (eq:A5), reconstructing their complete untested kernels with the stated wavefront bounds;

  4. the retained six-branch tree kernel has the defined precomposition presentation (eq:presum);

  5. no common characteristic operator map for the grouped target on tests meeting is constructed;

  6. no is admitted in .

The named internal amplitude ending is Constructed at I2. The grouped characteristic coefficient remains Unresolved at I3, within G2/F2/E1/D2/J2. XV-B remains closed.

No universal obstruction to the class fixed in I1, full cancellation theorem, or admitted quantum output is asserted.

Proof. Lemma lem:multiplier and Proposition prop:pole prove (i). Theorems thm:dyadic and thm:reconstruction, with Corollary cor:remainder, prove (ii). Propositions prop:both and prop:WF prove (iii), summarized in Theorem thm:I2.

Proposition prop:precomposition proves (iv). Theorem thm:I3 identifies (v). Sections sec:I4–sec:I6 record the undischarged subsequent gates and establish (vi). Corollary cor:XVB gives the exit consequence.

What has advanced

Nearby in this section