Manuscript XIX-B@1 · XIX-B.tex · lemma · b5670709

Lemma: Lemma C: smooth uniqueness closes only a matched problem

Lemma C: uniqueness and the scope of an extension · lines 810–873 · proof included or linked

XIX-B@1#lem:C

Back to manuscript

Let be smooth scalar, vector, or tensor forcings on . Suppose are smooth solutions of

with equal ordinary coordinate-time Cauchy data. Then

The statement holds componentwise over , without spatial decay or finite total energy.

For different operators, uniqueness of each separate problem does not by itself identify their solutions. A proposed common solution must satisfy both equations.

Proof. Equality of solutions implies equality of forcings by application of .

Conversely, if the forcings agree, the difference satisfies and zero data. It suffices to treat a real scalar component. Fix , , and . Set

These are compact integration regions, so is finite. The wave equation gives

The boundary moves inward with speed one. Therefore

Zero initial position implies zero initial spatial gradient, and hence . Nonnegativity gives . Thus for , and

The point was arbitrary. Smoothness includes the endpoints. Real and imaginary parts, and then all components, give the stated extensions.

For different operators, the difference of two solutions need not satisfy one homogeneous equation. The preceding uniqueness argument cannot be applied until the equations have been matched or the candidate has been tested in both.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 814

  • unlabeled · line 819

  • unlabeled · line 838

  • unlabeled · line 847

  • unlabeled · line 852

  • unlabeled · line 861

Nearby in this section