Manuscript XIX-B@1 · XIX-B.tex · lemma · b5670709
Lemma: Lemma C: smooth uniqueness closes only a matched problem
Lemma C: uniqueness and the scope of an extension · lines 810–873 · proof included or linked
XIX-B@1#lem:C
Let be smooth scalar, vector, or tensor forcings on . Suppose are smooth solutions of
with equal ordinary coordinate-time Cauchy data. Then
The statement holds componentwise over , without spatial decay or finite total energy.
For different operators, uniqueness of each separate problem does not by itself identify their solutions. A proposed common solution must satisfy both equations.
Proof. Equality of solutions implies equality of forcings by application of .
Conversely, if the forcings agree, the difference satisfies and zero data. It suffices to treat a real scalar component. Fix , , and . Set
These are compact integration regions, so is finite. The wave equation gives
The boundary moves inward with speed one. Therefore
Zero initial position implies zero initial spatial gradient, and hence . Nonnegativity gives . Thus for , and
The point was arbitrary. Smoothness includes the endpoints. Real and imaginary parts, and then all components, give the stated extensions.
For different operators, the difference of two solutions need not satisfy one homogeneous equation. The preceding uniqueness argument cannot be applied until the equations have been matched or the candidate has been tested in both.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 814
unlabeled · line 819
unlabeled · line 838
unlabeled · line 847
unlabeled · line 852
unlabeled · line 861