Manuscript XIX-D@1 · XIX-D.tex · section · 1f47e33b

CVIII: incidence parameter and finite register

Object-by-object inventory › CVIII: incidence parameter and finite register · lines 1251–1282

Back to manuscript

The supplied VIII-A/B/C records concern declared packets, matching, residual interfaces, promised source tokens, and guarded composition CheungVIIIA,CheungVIIIB,CheungVIIIC. During incidence the packet remains frozen; regular source replacement is a separate command.

To claim a continuum quantum interpretation, a successor must add at least:

  1. a refinement family, time calibration, common state and observable comparison interfaces;

  2. complete source-acquisition instruments when the source is not an externally supplied promise;

  3. controlled convergence of complete channels or observables, including their reference extensions;

  4. a physical causal realization if scheduled support is to be interpreted as physical causality;

  5. a matter–geometry law if the cone is to evolve dynamically;

  6. frame-covariance data if an invariant physical speed is claimed.

None is constructed for the native incidence package here. The record and token refusals, and Proposition prop:evolution, show why finite data alone do not select them.

There is no field regulator family to remove by renaming a register refinement. A finite update can be a quantum channel; it is not thereby a continuum clock or a field-theoretic instrument.