Manuscript XV-F-patch@1 · XV-F-patch.tex · proposition · 6d6ef16d

Proposition: Reconstruction descent

Patch J: the target, blocks, stress, and map clauses › Descent: the global criterion and the local information · lines 1824–1868 · proof included or linked

XV-F-patch@1#prop:descent, XV-F-patch@1#eq:descent, XV-F-patch@1#eq:restricteddescent

Back to manuscript

Let

be the common reconstruction, and let

be linear. Then defines a map on reconstructed kernels if and only if

When this holds, the induced map is uniquely given by

Agreement with canonical contraction on gives only

where is restriction. It does not prove (eq:descent) across the complement of .

Proof. If , a null presentation has image zero. Conversely, two presentations with equal reconstruction differ by a null presentation; condition (eq:descent) makes their proposed images equal. The induced map is therefore well defined and unique.

On , canonical contraction respects equality of reconstructed kernels. A null presentation thus has proposed image restricting to zero there whenever canonical agreement holds. That proves (eq:restricteddescent). A distribution supported in is not detected by this restriction, so the global kernel inclusion does not follow.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • XV-F-patch@1#eq:descent · line 1836

  • XV-F-patch@1#eq:restricteddescent · line 1846

  • unlabeled · line 1827

  • unlabeled · line 1831

  • unlabeled · line 1841

Nearby in this section