Manuscript XV-F-patch@1 · XV-F-patch.tex · proposition · 6d6ef16d
Proposition: Reconstruction descent
Patch J: the target, blocks, stress, and map clauses › Descent: the global criterion and the local information · lines 1824–1868 · proof included or linked
XV-F-patch@1#prop:descent, XV-F-patch@1#eq:descent, XV-F-patch@1#eq:restricteddescent
Let
be the common reconstruction, and let
be linear. Then defines a map on reconstructed kernels if and only if
When this holds, the induced map is uniquely given by
Agreement with canonical contraction on gives only
where is restriction. It does not prove (eq:descent) across the complement of .
Proof. If , a null presentation has image zero. Conversely, two presentations with equal reconstruction differ by a null presentation; condition (eq:descent) makes their proposed images equal. The induced map is therefore well defined and unique.
On , canonical contraction respects equality of reconstructed kernels. A null presentation thus has proposed image restricting to zero there whenever canonical agreement holds. That proves (eq:restricteddescent). A distribution supported in is not detected by this restriction, so the global kernel inclusion does not follow.
Displayed formulas in this passage
XV-F-patch@1#eq:descent · line 1836
XV-F-patch@1#eq:restricteddescent · line 1846
unlabeled · line 1827
unlabeled · line 1831
unlabeled · line 1841