Manuscript XVI-B@1 · XVI-B.tex · lemma · 6a0abffd

Lemma: An integrated kernel can have an affine past tail

Update from the supplied later sheets › Auxiliary evaluation and corrected support: XVI-F-v2 · lines 1442–1481 · proof included or linked

XVI-B@1#lem:affine-tail, XVI-B@1#eq:affine-tail

Back to manuscript

Let be supported in and define

Then is smooth, , and for . For ,

Thus compact support of does not imply compact support of .

Nevertheless and belong to . The same statements hold componentwise for tensor coefficients.

Proof. Differentiate under the integral:

The future vanishing follows from the source support. For , expand over the fixed source support to obtain (eq:affine-tail).

The product is smooth, vanishes for , and vanishes for . The product is smooth and supported in the fixed ramp.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • XVI-B@1#eq:affine-tail · line 1452

  • unlabeled · line 1446

  • unlabeled · line 1469

Nearby in this section