Manuscript XVI-B@1 · XVI-B.tex · lemma · 6a0abffd
Lemma: An integrated kernel can have an affine past tail
Update from the supplied later sheets › Auxiliary evaluation and corrected support: XVI-F-v2 · lines 1442–1481 · proof included or linked
XVI-B@1#lem:affine-tail, XVI-B@1#eq:affine-tail
Let be supported in and define
Then is smooth, , and for . For ,
Thus compact support of does not imply compact support of .
Nevertheless and belong to . The same statements hold componentwise for tensor coefficients.
Proof. Differentiate under the integral:
The future vanishing follows from the source support. For , expand over the fixed source support to obtain (eq:affine-tail).
The product is smooth, vanishes for , and vanishes for . The product is smooth and supported in the fixed ramp.
Displayed formulas in this passage
XVI-B@1#eq:affine-tail · line 1452
unlabeled · line 1446
unlabeled · line 1469