Manuscript XVI-D@1 · XVI-D.tex · section · b73c6f4a
Debugging and non-claims
Debugging and non-claims · lines 1636–1685
The revision corrects the following points:
Smooth uniqueness is proved in the relevant unrestricted class, rather than inferred from an ambiguous reading of a localization statement.
Past compactness is defined explicitly and is not confused with compact support in the open slab.
The repeated derivative index is , avoiding confusion with the frequency .
Coordinate forcing is proved spatially noncompact on the nonempty interval ; both real and imaginary components are checked.
“The compact-source theorem does not apply” replaces any wording suggesting that every inherited construction fails.
The existence of a coordinate solution and of a restricted extension is affirmative, not left as a supposed nonexistence issue.
The broader smooth-source definition reported by XVI-F-v3 is acknowledged; its retarded use must be matched to the inherited completion.
The root limitation is a limitation on direct substitution, not a prohibition on valid polarization.
The current XVI-F-v3 compatibility result replaces the earlier unresolved-residual status.
No claim is made of:
repair of X-G or XI-G;
new admission into a microcausal polynomial class;
construction of a compact class kernel or a quantum retarded coefficient;
a general distributional operator-domain extension;
a cutoff-modified witness;
a sharp-width limit or uniform estimates as ;
an interacting BRST/BV construction, loop, state, or ultraviolet subtraction.
The auxiliary extension is a specified smooth-source construction, not a distributional extension theorem. The inverse coefficient is not . A response contraction is not an insertion, and a smooth response is not a class kernel. No successful compiler execution or full-corpus verification is represented.