Manuscript XVI-D@1 · XVI-D.tex · section · b73c6f4a

Debugging and non-claims

Debugging and non-claims · lines 1636–1685

Back to manuscript

The revision corrects the following points:

  • Smooth uniqueness is proved in the relevant unrestricted class, rather than inferred from an ambiguous reading of a localization statement.

  • Past compactness is defined explicitly and is not confused with compact support in the open slab.

  • The repeated derivative index is , avoiding confusion with the frequency .

  • Coordinate forcing is proved spatially noncompact on the nonempty interval ; both real and imaginary components are checked.

  • “The compact-source theorem does not apply” replaces any wording suggesting that every inherited construction fails.

  • The existence of a coordinate solution and of a restricted extension is affirmative, not left as a supposed nonexistence issue.

  • The broader smooth-source definition reported by XVI-F-v3 is acknowledged; its retarded use must be matched to the inherited completion.

  • The root limitation is a limitation on direct substitution, not a prohibition on valid polarization.

  • The current XVI-F-v3 compatibility result replaces the earlier unresolved-residual status.

No claim is made of:

  • repair of X-G or XI-G;

  • new admission into a microcausal polynomial class;

  • construction of a compact class kernel or a quantum retarded coefficient;

  • a general distributional operator-domain extension;

  • a cutoff-modified witness;

  • a sharp-width limit or uniform estimates as ;

  • an interacting BRST/BV construction, loop, state, or ultraviolet subtraction.

The auxiliary extension is a specified smooth-source construction, not a distributional extension theorem. The inverse coefficient is not . A response contraction is not an insertion, and a smooth response is not a class kernel. No successful compiler execution or full-corpus verification is represented.

Nearby in this section