Manuscript XVI-K@1 · XVI-K.tex · lemma · aa7553bb
Lemma: Grading and punctured identities
Homogeneity, inventory, and the finite graded span · lines 1063–1121 · proof included or linked
XVI-K@1#lem:grading, XVI-K@1#eq:grading, XVI-K@1#eq:Leibniz1, XVI-K@1#eq:Leibniz2, XVI-K@1#eq:trace
For , define
Then
On the punctured domain,
All three graded subspaces are nonzero.
Proof. Each element of is homogeneous of degree . If , dilation gives for every . Three distinct dilations give an invertible Vandermonde system, proving directness.
The products satisfy the distributional product rule where their wavefront criterion holds, giving (eq:Leibniz1)–(eq:Leibniz2). By Lemma lem:families, ; hence on the punctured domain, which proves (eq:trace).
The massless time-ordered square is nonzero and has scaling degree four; this is also stated in FR (Section 7, following Theorem 7.2). Thus . If , all first derivatives of vanish by (eq:Leibniz1). On the connected punctured space it is then constant, incompatible with nonzero homogeneity of degree . If , equation (eq:Leibniz2) similarly makes every constant, and its degree makes it zero. This contradicts .
Displayed formulas in this passage
XVI-K@1#eq:grading · line 1075
XVI-K@1#eq:Leibniz1 · line 1080
XVI-K@1#eq:Leibniz2 · line 1080
XVI-K@1#eq:trace · line 1080
unlabeled · line 1066
Nearby in this section
- section: Homogeneity, inventory, and the finite graded span
- lemma: Lemma: Homogeneity from the Fourier families
- proposition: Proposition: Numerical scaling and declared subtraction orders
- section: Homogeneity, inventory, and the finite graded span
- section: Homogeneity, inventory, and the finite graded span