Manuscript XVI-K@1 · XVI-K.tex · proposition · aa7553bb

Proposition: Point-supported changes

Prescription ambiguity and propagated contact terms › Individual bounds and coherent changes · lines 1723–1762 · proof included or linked

XVI-K@1#prop:localambiguity, XVI-K@1#eq:Dq

Back to manuscript

For each label , any other extension with satisfies

If the alternative choices are required to define a coherent linear map on , these constants are constrained by the constant-coefficient relations among the kernels. They are not independent parameters for all twenty-five labels.

Proof. The difference is supported at zero. The scaling bound and the point-support structure theorem allow only derivatives of through order , as in BF (Theorem 5.3). This argument also covers a zero punctured kernel when the declared upper bound is used.

For a relation , coherence requires both extension maps to annihilate that relation. Consequently

Independence of the derivatives of gives the corresponding constraints. Equivalently, is a linear point-supported map on the finite graded span, with grade- order bound .

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • XVI-K@1#eq:Dq · line 1728

  • unlabeled · line 1754

Nearby in this section