Manuscript XVI-L@1 · XVI-L.tex · section · 35081099

Non-claims

Status › Non-claims · lines 1596–1613

Back to manuscript
  1. L-D is not claimed; no bulk gravitational or insertion matching is proved (Proposition prop:Lmatch).

  2. The object constructed is the complete-source contribution for the specified two-edge graph; it is not called, and is not, the complete one-loop gravitational correction.

  3. Collision counterterms are not evidence that this graph determines gravitational Wilson coefficients (Section sec:l8).

  4. The four-derivative jet bound is not a proved curvature-squared counterterm identity (Remark rem:L4der).

  5. Scale-dependent subtraction is not a physical beta function of a complete gravitational quantity (Remark rem:Lscale).

  6. The four interpretive counterterm categories of Section sec:l5D are kept distinct as attributes (not a disjoint partition); they are not identified with bulk gravitational action counterterms.

  7. The unrooted changes are collision-local; their propagated images are given by the root pairing. Locality or nonlocality of those functionals is not established here (Remark rem:Lloc).

  8. Coupling and loop weights are undetermined; only the combinatorial graph factor is fixed (Proposition prop:Lnorm).

  9. No BRST, BV, or Ward identity, no all-orders renormalization, no gravitational-symmetry compatibility is claimed (Remark rem:LBV).

  10. No limit ; no state; no ultraviolet completion; no physical observable; nonvanishing of is not claimed.

  11. XVI-K's statements are cited as stated; none is upgraded, and XVI-A–XVI-K are not modified.

  12. The imported root hypotheses (R1)–(R3) are used, not re-proved.

  13. Declared orders are not defined through .

  14. Computational regressions support the stated identities; they do not replace the written proofs.

Nearby in this section