Manuscript XVI-M@1 · XVI-M.tex · proposition · 7346c909
Proposition: Reduction of G
M.3 Contact space, graph maps, and invisible directions · lines 927–948 · proof included or linked
XVI-M@1#prop:Gsplit
In the formal universal-jet reading of Definition def:Gmaps (with the presentation of Theorem thm:M2): Then if and only if for every . Hence
Proof.
Coherence gives with .
Taylor expansion of in gives the unique canonical form , with
.
Proceed by descending induction on : the top coefficient is .
In the formal reading the -jet symbols (at ) and the -jet and symbols (at ) are independent, and evaluation on the diagonal does not identify any two of them.
So for all data if and only if as a polynomial (the factor in is independent), and then all its -derivatives vanish too.
Thus if and only if for every .
By the reduced expansion this means for all , i.e.\ annihilates .
Monomials of different are disjoint (preparation order , -order , checked in contact_space.py), so the conditions split by .
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 932
Nearby in this section
- definition: Definition: Coherent contact space
- definition: Definition: Three graph maps and two named variants
- section: M.3 Contact space, graph maps, and invisible directions
- remark: Remark: Faithfulness for the specializations
- theorem: Theorem: Ambient freedom versus graph-visible collision freedom
- lemma: Lemma: Reported computation for M.3