Manuscript XVI-M@1 · XVI-M.tex · remark · 7346c909

Remark: Top contact versus full tensor; relation to XVI-L

M.6 Dilation identity, residues, and matched scale variation › Scale derivative versus dilation defect at every grade (work package B) · lines 1824–1828

XVI-M@1#rem:wpB-topfull

Back to manuscript

The split between the cutoff-independent top component and the cutoff-dependent lower-degree components matches the residue left open by XVI-L, thm:L6: “No explicit nonzero scaling residue (anomaly form) is claimed (Remark rem:Lressretch)”, where rem:Lressretch notes that “a nonzero homogeneous distribution of degree may still have vanishing spherical average against the radial derivative of ”. The value (Theorem thm:M6-S2) discharges only the top contact (the nonvanishing spherical average at ); the lower-degree, -dependent contacts at are not discharged.

Nearby in this section