Manuscript XVI-P@p23 · XVI-P.tex · section · 9b0037a7

E2: decoupling from the ch-projected slot (proof)

Scope of revision p16: E2 analysis and Batch C › E2: decoupling from the ch-projected slot (proof) · lines 752–778

Back to manuscript

In p15 D13 has an evanescent structure with and UV pole ; p14r declares no evanescent counterterm. D13 enters the ch projection only through the row :

where is the operator of the monomials of (linearized Einstein–Hilbert). Its exact covariant form is fitted from the frozen density and verified on all components; the fit is unique.

  • L1. as a covariant identity. Only is used; no trace is taken, so the identity holds exactly in .

  • L2. is longitudinal in .

  • L3. Therefore identically. The slot value is for every external assignment (Q4S, QdS, mixed components), exactly in and not merely .

  • L4 (control). The non-longitudinal and give nonzero slot values, so the map is not trivially zero. for D13, so D13's whole ch-slot contribution is .

Mutation controls: the gauge-fixed operator in place of , in place of , and a wrong index slot each make the slot nonzero and are rejected. At one loop the ch projection is linear in , so no product of evanescent poles arises.

Outcome: DECOUPLED (proof). No evanescent counterterm is added and no contract file changes for E2. The pole remains a UV pole of the -scalar component of the Green function (R6: retained and recorded). Its renormalization matters only outside this projection, and it is not claimed here. D13 stays regulated, with a ch-slot contribution of .

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 756