Manuscript XVII-A@1 · XVII-A.tex · section · 711d7ee4

What is, and is not, inherited

Source-alignment and non-premise ledger › What is, and is not, inherited · lines 1277–1300

Back to manuscript

All formal premises of the reconstruction theorem are displayed in this paper:

  1. the fixed metric and conformal boundary;

  2. the finite Hilbert spaces and matrices;

  3. the finite bulk and boundary mode expansions;

  4. the declared occupation-basis correspondence ;

  5. quantum access to the stated boundary algebra.

These are not claimed to follow from the supplied manuscript ledger.

Cheung's XIV-J distinguishes an absent full map from a universal obstruction CheungXIV. The same logical caution applies here: the lack of an inherited connecting map is not a theorem that every such map is impossible. The inherited candidate versions of XVII-A remain unconstructed, rather than universally obstructed.

The elementary obstruction in Proposition prop:record-obstruction has a different object, domain, and map class from H2, I3, or J2. Similar language does not identify these problems.