Retained programme boundaries

This holographic-reconstruction comparison is not XVI-N's Route B. No result here discharges that route. The paper makes no new assertion resolving H2, I3, or J2, does not open XV-B as an admission exit, and does not close O.1. No inherited quantum coefficient is admitted CheungXIV,CheungXV,CheungXVI.

The distinction between the classical-limit project associated with Em06 in the supplied plan and the present boundary reconstruction project is retained. Neither is enlarged into a derivation of classical spacetime by the present finite theorem.

status. All results released here are analytical finite-matrix results. The text does not assert executed numerical checks, successful pdfLaTeX compilation, machine verification, a laboratory realization, an operational resource optimum, or registration of XVII-A. The source is self-contained and requires no external bibliography file.

. One operator has been reconstructed from one declared boundary region in one explicit finite model. The representation correspondence and geometry were not inferred from the reconstruction. The complete record is weaker than quantum-state recovery, and the declared data do not identify even the background radius in the displayed normalization-fixed family. Consequently the completed finite theorem is not holographic emergence of classical spacetime.