Manuscript XVII-A@1 · XVII-A.tex · section · 711d7ee4
The nonimplication ledger
Scope, completion choice, and corrected statement › The nonimplication ledger · lines 157–192
The intended refusal is better expressed as a nonimplication than as an assertion that the underlying objects can never coincide:
A decoder can implement a bulk–boundary map after the relevant identifications have been supplied and proved. It does not supply those identifications merely by being a decoder. The distinction is important even for holographic code models Pastawski2015.
There are three separate claims:
Operator reconstruction: the named boundary data determine the named bulk observable in the declared model.
Metric reconstruction: boundary data determine a bulk metric within a specified metric class.
Gravitational dynamics: microscopic assumptions imply specified gravitational field equations.
Only the first is established here. Results concerning entanglement-wedge reconstruction, entropy–area relations, or linearized gravitational equations require their own additional assumptions DHW2016,RT2006,Faulkner2014.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 161