Manuscript XVIII-A@2 · XVIII-A-v2.tex · section · 0f4336ec

Documentary normalization, not a reconstructed model

The frozen specification contract › Documentary normalization, not a reconstructed model · lines 387–432

XVIII-A@2#eq:docnormalization, XVIII-A@2#eq:docsource, XVIII-A@2#eq:docsign, XVIII-A@2#eq:doclayer

Back to manuscript

For comparison only, the supplied XVI-A convention records

Here is the source's metric notation, its curvature scalar, and its fixed unintegrated cubic density. These displayed conventions are not a definition here of the full cubic component arrays or gauge complex CheungXVIA,CheungXIIC.

The cubic-only density weight matters: weighting the entire Einstein–Hilbert density would alter lower orders and would not preserve the same frozen specification CheungXIIC. For a time-only weight, the documentary source residual is

The arrays are source-defined coefficients, not derived from their names in this paper.

Nor are these conventions equated with the X-track inverse . Comparing the two normalizations requires an explicit transport of fields, vertices, products, and observables CheungXE,CheungXF.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • XVIII-A@2#eq:docnormalization · line 390

  • XVIII-A@2#eq:docsource · line 390

  • XVIII-A@2#eq:docsign · line 390

  • XVIII-A@2#eq:doclayer · line 418