Manuscript XX-A@1 · XX-A.tex · section · 3a586110
Corrections to the target-selection rationale
Question, choice of target, and exact release › Corrections to the target-selection rationale · lines 191–214
XIX-B's reported forcing residual
excludes one direct identification between two specified coordinate prescriptions XIXB,CheungXVID. It does not show that every independently frozen VI harmonic prescription is defective. Choosing the original-rod lapse avoids importing that particular identification; it does not establish that the lapse is easier to quantize.
Likewise, Em02-E's supplied record already specifies a classical observable and classical covariance. Its incomplete quantum audit must not be renamed as failure of all its classical results CheungEm02E. The classical construction below is proved independently on a narrower, explicitly stated domain.
Pure-trace kernel non-determination is the relevant shape of XVIII-A CheungXVIIIA. XVIII-B supplies a different massive stress-response benchmark CheungXVIIIB; it is not silently renamed as that kernel theorem.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 194