Manuscript XX-C@1 · XX-C.tex · theorem · 7a8cab37

Theorem: Same-class obstruction to an exact positive physical restriction

Physical positivity: a necessary test and an exact same-class counterexample › Explicit nonpositive normalization · lines 766–808 · proof included or linked

XX-C@1#thm:nonpositive, XX-C@1#eq:bad

Back to manuscript

Let , and choose as in Lemma lem:TT. Put

and define

Then:

  1. has the same field equations, canonical antisymmetric part, adjoint condition, and Hadamard singularities;

  2. ;

  3. no positive physical state can have this exact restriction on the invariant observable .

The class of in (eq:quotient) is nonzero.

Proof. The added kernel is smooth, symmetric, real, and a bisolution of . Thus it changes none of the singular or antisymmetric data. The definition of gives .

If for compact , formal self-adjointness and would give , a contradiction. Hence is a nonzero invariant observable. Proposition prop:necessary excludes the exact positive restriction.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • XX-C@1#eq:bad · line 778

  • unlabeled · line 772

Nearby in this section