Manuscript XX-C@1 · XX-C.tex · theorem · 7a8cab37
Theorem: Same-class obstruction to an exact positive physical restriction
Physical positivity: a necessary test and an exact same-class counterexample › Explicit nonpositive normalization · lines 766–808 · proof included or linked
XX-C@1#thm:nonpositive, XX-C@1#eq:bad
Let , and choose as in Lemma lem:TT. Put
and define
Then:
has the same field equations, canonical antisymmetric part, adjoint condition, and Hadamard singularities;
;
no positive physical state can have this exact restriction on the invariant observable .
The class of in (eq:quotient) is nonzero.
Proof. The added kernel is smooth, symmetric, real, and a bisolution of . Thus it changes none of the singular or antisymmetric data. The definition of gives .
If for compact , formal self-adjointness and would give , a contradiction. Hence is a nonzero invariant observable. Proposition prop:necessary excludes the exact positive restriction.
Displayed formulas in this passage
XX-C@1#eq:bad · line 778
unlabeled · line 772