Manuscript XX-E@1 · XX-E.tex · section · cf7a8f40

What an eventual removal theorem must prove

Refinement non-determination and why removal is not entered › What an eventual removal theorem must prove · lines 1478–1513

Back to manuscript

If regulator removal is later attempted, retain independent parameters such as

A sufficient comparison theorem on a fixed domain would exhibit, for every relevant continuous seminorm ,

together with the completion and uniform operation estimates needed to define the limit. To compare two different regulator families, one additionally needs a cross-family estimate or an independently proved common characterization of their limits.

Having a limit within each family is not cross-family independence. Selected outcome laws, records, or compact-local field limits are not substitutes for product convergence on the native domain CheungXIXC.

No such quantum estimate is proved here. The identity prerequisite in the revised plan has also not been supplied. Accordingly, optional quantum regulator removal is not entered.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 1482

  • unlabeled · line 1488