Manuscript Em06-B@1 · Em06-B-v1.tex · 61e38859
Em06-B: Robust classical concentration and quantum fluctuations of scalar-only plateau relational observables Finite families, displaced states, and controlled classical inputs
Specifies version 1 of a quantitative extension of the scalar-only first plateau coefficient. The metric coefficient remains a prescribed classical input. Only the free scalar is quantized. spec:data, lem:identities, prop:test, prop:gauge, lem:mass-shell, and thm:estimate rederive the density variation, the coordinate-time Cauchy prescription, the compact test, the restricted plateau identity, and a nonoptimal estimate using six derivatives of the observation test and metric coefficient and three derivatives of the switch. thm:states and cor:uniform give mean, variance, mean-square, and spectral Wasserstein concentration for displaced states when epsilon times the residual number expectation tends to zero. That number condition is sufficient and not necessary. The exact condition is vanishing of epsilon times the observable-specific second moment. thm:commuting gives a joint spectral law for finite commuting families. thm:ordered treats general families by ordered Weyl expectations and does not assume a joint probability distribution. thm:fluctuations keeps the declared, possibly degenerate CCR at the fluctuation scale and shows that concentration alone does not determine a fluctuation limit. thm:input-stability controls metric, switch, test, and preparation changes. prop:noise separates intrinsic from measured concentration for one additive-noise POVM. thm:release is the analytical release of gates B1 through B5. The optional finite-mode metric gate B6 is not entered and is not constructed. This is not an interacting gravitational product, not regulator removal, not backreaction, not metric reconstruction, not Einstein dynamics, not holographic identification, and not spacetime emergence. Em06-A is a comparison and is not a premise. VII-A, VII-B, V, VII-H, IX-A, and XI-G are not premises. XVII-A is a different project and is not an input. The XI-G free-shell obstruction is untouched. This is not a Page curve. H2, I3, and J2 remain unresolved. It does not close O.1. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. The series Route B is not discharged. XVI-N is not discharged. XV-B is not opened. XVI-P is registered and is not a premise. Full spacetime emergence is not constructed. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted. Numerical execution is not asserted. Independent execution is not asserted.
Front matter
abstractAbstractFront matter · lines 76–108
Open as its own pageWe prove a quantitative extension of the scalar-only first plateau coefficient studied in the supplied Em06-A draft. The metric coefficient remains a prescribed classical input. We independently derive the density variation, zero-coordinate-time Cauchy prescription, compact-test representation, and restricted gauge identity. On common compact supports we prove an explicit, nonoptimal estimate using six derivatives of the observation test and metric coefficient and three derivatives of the switch.
For displaced Fock-normal states with finite residual number expectation , the condition gives uniform mean, variance, mean-square, and spectral Wasserstein concentration on bounded input families. Observable-specific second moments give the exact necessary and sufficient condition, so the number condition is sufficient but not necessary. Finite commuting families possess joint spectral laws; general families are treated by ordered Weyl expectations, not by an assumed joint probability distribution.
Normalized fluctuations retain the declared, possibly degenerate CCR form. Their laws are exactly the laws of the undisplaced fields in the residual states, and concentration alone does not determine a fluctuation limit. We prove input-stability estimates and evaluate nonzero success, bias-failure, amplified-variance, and nonconvergent-fluctuation examples. An explicitly defined additive-noise POVM separates intrinsic from measured concentration.
The release comprises the scalar-only gates B1–B5. The optional finite-mode metric gate B6 is not entered. No interacting gravitational product, regulator removal, backreaction, metric reconstruction, Einstein dynamics, holographic identification, or inherited gravitational coefficient admission is obtained.
Question, scope, and source discipline
sectionQuestion, scope, and source disciplineQuestion, scope, and source discipline · lines 111–165
Open as its own pageThe question is:
Under which explicit preparation and input-control assumptions do families of scalar-only plateau relational coefficients concentrate on their named classical values, and what survives at the normalized fluctuation scale?
The observable is the first relational coefficient, not a full finite-coupling nonlinear observable. Its architecture agrees with the first-order plateau construction described in Cheung's VII-A
thm:firstCheungVIIA and with the supplied Em06-A draft Em06A. Every identity needed here is rederived in the conventions printed below. No second-order theorem is imported.The coherent-state mechanism is established mathematics Glauber,Hepp. Our contribution is the explicit quantitative package for this named scalar-only coefficient: compact-test estimates, finite families, residual-state assumptions, input control, and the separation between concentration and quantum fluctuations. We do not claim a new general coherent-state or semiclassical-limit principle.
The Wigner-measure literature provides a broader bosonic framework ANphase,ANgeneral. Its nonlinear propagation results have their own hypotheses ANpropagation. They are not premises of the fixed-input estimates proved here. Likewise, dynamical fluctuation theorems such as BenArous are comparisons, not substitutes for our exact displacement calculation.
precise weakening is retained. Only the scalar is quantized. The metric coefficient is fixed before the compact scalar test is passed to the quantum representation. We do not construct a quantized metric-dependent insertion, an interacting BRST/BV complex, or an interacting relational product. This retains the distinction emphasized in V and in the sharp joint insertion problem of VII-B CheungV,CheungVIIB.
attached XVII-A is a different project. The supplied file
XVII-A.texdeclares a finite-matrix boundary reconstruction benchmark XVIIA. Its geometry, matrices, boundary algebra, and correspondence are not inputs here. No identification between its effect and the present Minkowski relational coefficient is asserted.comparisons are not verified premises. Cheung citations refer to the supplied versions and excerpts. The added descriptions of VII-I and VII-J include theorem labels without the full corresponding proofs. We therefore use those descriptions only as comparison material Dossier, not as independently audited theorems or premises. In particular, a summary calling a landmark “verified” does not verify its signs, domains, or compatibility with the present model.
Frozen conventions and the classical object
assumptionModel specification: Common classical dataFrozen conventions and the classical object › Background, supports, and input topologies · Em06-B@1#spec:data · lines 171–209
Open as its own pageFix
a mass , and . Set
Fix compact sets
for some , where is the spatial ball of radius . Fix an open set compactly contained in .
The allowed observation tests and switches are
with on a neighborhood of . We assume this switch class is nonempty.
The metric coefficient is any real smooth symmetric covariant tensor on . Its relevant control region is
The admitted gauge parameters are exactly
All support sets, the initial surface, , and remain fixed.
sectionBackground, supports, and input topologiesFrozen conventions and the classical object › Background, supports, and input topologies · Em06-B@1#eq:seminorms · lines 209–234
Open as its own pageFor spacetime multi-indices, define
The input-control topology is for fixed-support observation tests, for fixed-support switches, and the local seminorm for smooth metric coefficients. The preparation amplitude will be controlled in its one-particle Hilbert norm.
These are explicit local input controls, not a claim about convergence in a boundary-sensitive kernel topology or a topology of interacting gravitational functionals.
Indices are raised and lowered with . For , write
sectionDensity variation and Green signsFrozen conventions and the classical object › Density variation and Green signs · Em06-B@1#eq:Q, Em06-B@1#eq:action, Em06-B@1#eq:Green · lines 235–290
Open as its own pageSet
The switched scalar action through first order is
Its Euler equation is
In particular, the operator is , not . Derivatives of the switch are retained. The metric-jet parameter is independent of the classicality parameter .
Let and be the retarded and advanced Green operators of . With , our signs are
For compact smooth ,
We use their standard finite-propagation and Cauchy uniqueness properties BGP. The estimates needed for this model are proved in Appendix app:PDE.
sectionCoordinate prescription and observableFrozen conventions and the classical object › Coordinate prescription and observable · Em06-B@1#eq:w · lines 291–309
Open as its own pageFor , define the unswitched coordinate coefficient by
These are coordinate-time Cauchy data. They are not replaced by a metric-dependent normal-derivative prescription.
For a real smooth solution , define
The source is compact and separated from , and the response has zero initial data.
definitionDefinition: Scalar-only first plateau coefficientFrozen conventions and the classical object › Coordinate prescription and observable · Em06-B@1#def:observable, Em06-B@1#eq:observable · lines 310–323
Open as its own pageThe named classical functional is
sectionCoordinate prescription and observableFrozen conventions and the classical object › Coordinate prescription and observable · lines 323–338
Open as its own pageFor the formal metric ,
Thus is the harmonic coordinate map through first order, and its inverse has coefficient . Equation (eq:observable) is precisely the corresponding first scalar coefficient after composition with that inverse map.
The theorem concerns this coefficient itself. It does not infer a controlled full finite- observable from a formal first-order expansion.
Independent classical audit and compact-test estimates
lemmaLemma: Sign-sensitive identitiesIndependent classical audit and compact-test estimates · Em06-B@1#lem:identities, Em06-B@1#eq:Q-expanded, Em06-B@1#eq:CK, Em06-B@1#eq:QK · proof attached · lines 342–375
Open as its own pageThe following identities hold:
For real , is formally self-adjoint.
Proof. Expanding the divergence in (eq:Q) and using
gives (eq:Q-expanded). The trace of is , and direct differentiation gives (eq:CK). Finally,
Substituting into (eq:Q-expanded) proves (eq:QK). Formal self-adjointness follows by integration by parts in the divergence form, including its real zeroth-order term.
propositionProposition: Exact compact scalar testIndependent classical audit and compact-test estimates · Em06-B@1#prop:test, Em06-B@1#eq:q, Em06-B@1#eq:q-support, Em06-B@1#eq:compact-representation · proof attached · lines 377–434
Open as its own pagePut and
Then is real, smooth, and compactly supported, with
For every smooth free scalar solution,
The dependence support in the classical variables is contained in
which is compact.
Proof. Transposition of the retarded Green operator gives
The switched coefficient is compactly supported, so the last integration by parts has no Cauchy-surface contribution. The other term obeys
This proves the formula and its sign.
The advanced support property bounds the first term by ; the second is supported in . Both sets are separated from . Although is defined here for , its product with extends smoothly by zero near and below .
Finite propagation for the scalar response and coordinate Cauchy problem gives dependence only in . A compact observation set has bounded spatial causal past on a finite closed time slab, so is compact.
propositionProposition: Plateau gauge identity, before and after scalar descentIndependent classical audit and compact-test estimates · Em06-B@1#prop:gauge, Em06-B@1#eq:plateau, Em06-B@1#eq:test-gauge · proof attached · lines 436–476
Open as its own pageFor ,
At the test level,
Proof. Since and all its derivatives are supported where , . On the free scalar shell,
Retarded inversion gives , because this smooth function is compactly supported away from the initial surface. Equation (eq:CK) and Cauchy uniqueness similarly give . The two variations in (eq:observable) cancel.
For the stronger compact-test identity, and (eq:QK) yield
The multiplier makes compact.
sectionIndependent classical audit and compact-test estimatesIndependent classical audit and compact-test estimates · lines 476–481
Open as its own pageThis reproduces the required first-order plateau statement within the present conventions CheungVIIA. It proves no unrestricted diffeomorphism theorem.
sectionOne-particle map and classical preparationIndependent classical audit and compact-test estimates › One-particle map and classical preparation · Em06-B@1#eq:k, Em06-B@1#eq:v, Em06-B@1#eq:phi-z, Em06-B@1#eq:classical-symbol · lines 482–525
Open as its own pageUse the unitary spatial Fourier convention
Let
The inner product is linear in its second argument. For a real compact smooth spacetime test , define
Write
For , define the real smooth free scalar
Direct integration gives
The target therefore depends on the scalar preparation as well as the prescribed metric coefficient. Writing without naming the preparation would suppress an essential input.
lemmaLemma: Mass-shell estimate and scalar equation descentIndependent classical audit and compact-test estimates › One-particle map and classical preparation · Em06-B@1#lem:mass-shell · proof attached · lines 526–553
Open as its own pageOn a fixed compact support ,
Proof. Spatial integration by parts gives
The integral
is finite: controls the origin, and the radial integrand decays as at infinity. The norm is bounded by a fixed-support constant times .
The exponential in (eq:k) is annihilated by . Compact integration by parts proves .
theoremTheorem: Quantitative compact-test constructionIndependent classical audit and compact-test estimates › One-particle map and classical preparation · Em06-B@1#thm:estimate, Em06-B@1#eq:main-estimate · proof attached · lines 555–580
Open as its own pageThere is a finite constant , depending only on the fixed support geometry, , and a fixed spatial cutoff used in Appendix app:PDE, such that
The derivative orders are sufficient and are not claimed optimal. Consequently the map to is continuous in the stated input controls, uniformly on bounded families.
Proof. The detailed Cauchy and advanced estimates are proved in Appendix app:PDE. They bound through four derivatives by , and on through three derivatives by . Applying the product rule to (eq:q) gives the first estimate. Lemma lem:mass-shell, with common compact support , gives the second.
sectionOne-particle map and classical preparationIndependent classical audit and compact-test estimates › One-particle map and classical preparation · Em06-B@1#eq:v-gauge · lines 580–590
Open as its own pageBy Proposition prop:gauge and Lemma lem:mass-shell,
This is exact descent into the free scalar representation. It is not a theorem about a joint gravitational quantum ideal or elimination of interacting auxiliary fields.
The free scalar carrier and unbounded moments
sectionThe free scalar carrier and unbounded momentsThe free scalar carrier and unbounded moments · lines 592–605
Open as its own pageOn , let be antilinear and linear, with
Let be the number operator and
Initially these operators act on the finite-particle domain .
lemmaLemma: Self-adjoint fields and the number estimateThe free scalar carrier and unbounded moments · Em06-B@1#lem:field, Em06-B@1#eq:number-bound · proof attached · lines 606–645
Open as its own pageFor every , is essentially self-adjoint on . Its closure, denoted by the same symbol, satisfies
and the quadratic-form inequality
Proof. The creation–annihilation bounds are
Using proves (eq:number-bound) on .
For a vector supported in particle sectors at most ,
Its analytic-vector series converges. The analytic-vector criterion Nelson gives essential self-adjointness. Particle truncation converges in the graph norm of ; the displayed bound and closedness then extend the estimate and domain inclusion.
sectionThe free scalar carrier and unbounded momentsThe free scalar carrier and unbounded moments · Em06-B@1#eq:displacement, Em06-B@1#eq:Weyl, Em06-B@1#eq:CCR · lines 645–676
Open as its own pageWe always mean these self-adjoint closures. Commutator identities for unbounded fields are stated on the invariant common core, or as the corresponding quadratic-form identities, not as everywhere-defined products.
Define the unitary displacement and scaled Weyl operators by
Their conventions give
These follow by the scalar commutators of the generators, first on analytic vectors and then for the bounded unitary groups. They are the standard displacement/Weyl identities Glauber, with the signs fixed by our inner-product convention.
definitionDefinition: Residual and displaced statesThe free scalar carrier and unbounded moments · Em06-B@1#def:states, Em06-B@1#eq:rho-tilde, Em06-B@1#eq:O · lines 677–696
Open as its own pageLet be positive trace-class operators with
For a declared , put
For , the represented relational coefficient is
sectionThe free scalar carrier and unbounded momentsThe free scalar carrier and unbounded moments · Em06-B@1#eq:state-number · lines 696–724
Open as its own pageThe parameter is a dimensionless effective CCR parameter relative to a fixed reference unit of action. It is neither nor a smoothing width. The classical symbol is fixed while the representation section in (eq:O) varies.
of unbounded traces. If has finite number expectation, its positively weighted vectors with lie in . We define
The first moment is the absolutely convergent associated sum. These are spectral moments, independent of the decomposition. Notation such as below means this quadratic moment; it does not assume that the formal product is an already-defined trace-class operator.
Lemma lem:field implies
Displaced-state concentration: the exact criterion
sectionDisplaced-state concentration: the exact criterionDisplaced-state concentration: the exact criterion · Em06-B@1#eq:pointmass · lines 726–738
Open as its own pageFor a self-adjoint operator in a state , its spectral law is . For probability laws with finite second moments, denotes the quadratic Wasserstein metric. In particular,
because every coupling with a point mass has constant second coordinate.
theoremTheorem: Exact identities and concentration criterionDisplaced-state concentration: the exact criterion · Em06-B@1#thm:states, Em06-B@1#eq:mean-general, Em06-B@1#eq:variance-general, Em06-B@1#eq:mse, Em06-B@1#eq:number-condition, Em06-B@1#eq:concentration-budget · proof attached · lines 739–806
Open as its own pageFor Definition def:states, write
and let be the spectral law of in . Then
For a fixed named , the following are equivalent:
the mean tends to and the variance tends to zero;
;
.
A sufficient, not necessary, condition is
Under that condition,
Proof. The exact self-adjoint conjugation is
Unitary covariance of spectral measures gives the mean, variance, and second-moment identities. Their moments exist by (eq:state-number). Equation (eq:pointmass) proves the Wasserstein identity.
For every probability law with a finite second moment,
Both summands are nonnegative, proving the equivalences. Cauchy–Schwarz gives ; (eq:state-number) then proves the sufficient condition and all three estimates.
sectionDisplaced-state concentration: the exact criterionDisplaced-state concentration: the exact criterion · lines 806–810
Open as its own pageThe general spectral law in this theorem need not be Gaussian. No quasifree-state assumption was used.
corollaryCorollary: Uniform concentration on controlled input familiesDisplaced-state concentration: the exact criterion · Em06-B@1#cor:uniform · proof attached · lines 811–828
Open as its own pageLet be any family of data in Specification spec:data with
Let , with from Theorem thm:estimate. For a common residual state family, all bounds in (eq:concentration-budget) hold uniformly over with replaced by . The classical targets are the corresponding .
Proof. Theorem thm:estimate gives . Apply Theorem thm:states.
sectionDisplaced-state concentration: the exact criterionDisplaced-state concentration: the exact criterion · lines 828–834
Open as its own pageThis is uniform concentration around the named, possibly varying classical targets. Convergence to a single fixed target additionally requires control of their variation; that is proved in Section sec:robustness.
Finite families: spectral laws versus ordered Weyl correlations
sectionFinite families: spectral laws versus ordered Weyl correlationsFinite families: spectral laws versus ordered Weyl correlations · Em06-B@1#eq:SA · lines 836–851
Open as its own pageFix real , with common , and write
Define the real matrices
The matrix is positive semidefinite and is antisymmetric.
sectionSecond moments and commutatorsFinite families: spectral laws versus ordered Weyl correlations › Second moments and commutators · lines 852–866
Open as its own pageFor a residual state , define its field cross moments by
These sums exist by (eq:state-number). Set
propositionProposition: Two distinct finite-family structuresFinite families: spectral laws versus ordered Weyl correlations › Second moments and commutators · Em06-B@1#prop:covariance, Em06-B@1#eq:cov-general, Em06-B@1#eq:comm-general · proof attached · lines 867–916
Open as its own pageFor every finite-number residual state,
The symmetric covariance in the displaced state is
On the common core,
For the displaced vacuum,
so the symmetric covariance is exactly .
Proof. On finite-particle vectors the weak commutator gives
Particle truncation converges in , and (eq:number-bound) passes this identity to that form domain. Summing over the state decomposition proves the imaginary-part statement.
Displacement shifts each field by its real constant after scaling. Covariance is unaffected by this shift, proving (eq:cov-general). The core commutator is (eq:CCR) with the scale included. For the vacuum,
and all first moments vanish.
sectionSecond moments and commutatorsFinite families: spectral laws versus ordered Weyl correlations › Second moments and commutators · lines 916–920
Open as its own pageThus symmetric noise covariance and antisymmetric commutation are not the same quantity.
theoremTheorem: Joint spectral concentration precisely in the commuting sectorFinite families: spectral laws versus ordered Weyl correlations › The commuting sector · Em06-B@1#thm:commuting, Em06-B@1#eq:joint-general, Em06-B@1#eq:joint-vacuum · proof attached · lines 923–980
Open as its own pageIf for every , the self-adjoint fields strongly commute. Their scaled counterparts have a joint spectral law in every state considered above.
For general residual states,
where and the metric on is Euclidean.
For the displaced vacuum,
Degenerate Gaussian covariance is allowed.
If some , the corresponding operators do not strongly commute. In that case no common joint spectral law of these operators is asserted.
Proof. When , (eq:Weyl) shows that their unitary groups commute for all real parameters. Commuting spectral measures follow from the spectral theorem for commuting unitary groups. The squared Euclidean distance to is the sum of the squared coordinate distances. Applying (eq:mse) to every marginal proves (eq:joint-general).
Vacuum normal ordering gives
For , displacement therefore gives the joint characteristic function
This identifies (eq:joint-vacuum).
Conversely, strong commutativity would make the two unitary groups commute for every pair of parameters. Their Weyl interchange phase is ; it cannot be one for every when .
sectionGeneral families: ordering is retainedFinite families: spectral laws versus ordered Weyl correlations › General families: ordering is retained · lines 982–990
Open as its own pageFor real , put
Products below are ordered by increasing .
theoremTheorem: Ordered Weyl expectations and their classical limitFinite families: spectral laws versus ordered Weyl correlations › General families: ordering is retained · Em06-B@1#thm:ordered, Em06-B@1#eq:ordered-general, Em06-B@1#eq:ordered-bound, Em06-B@1#eq:ordered-vacuum · proof attached · lines 991–1045
Open as its own pageFor arbitrary ,
Its distance from is at most
For the displaced vacuum, the exact formula is
Under , the ordered expectations converge to the classical product, uniformly for in compact subsets and for bounded input families with fixed .
Proof. Repeated use of (eq:Weyl) gives the phase and the final Weyl direction . Displacement gives , proving (eq:ordered-general).
Spectral calculus and Cauchy–Schwarz imply
Together with and (eq:state-number), this proves the bound. Vacuum normal ordering proves (eq:ordered-vacuum).
On compact -sets and bounded , both and have common finite bounds. This proves uniformity.
sectionGeneral families: ordering is retainedFinite families: spectral laws versus ordered Weyl correlations › General families: ordering is retained · lines 1045–1052
Open as its own pageThese are ordered quantum correlations, not a joint measurement distribution for noncommuting fields. They do not invoke the density-prepared free-product or ordering-transport statements described for VII-I Dossier, and they do not construct mixed time-ordered gravitational products.
Normalized fluctuations: what remains quantum
sectionNormalized fluctuations: what remains quantumNormalized fluctuations: what remains quantum · Em06-B@1#eq:F · lines 1054–1064
Open as its own pageDefine
This centering uses the named classical value, not necessarily the actual mean.
theoremTheorem: Exact fluctuation representationNormalized fluctuations: what remains quantum · Em06-B@1#thm:fluctuations, Em06-B@1#eq:fluctuation-conjugation, Em06-B@1#eq:fluctuation-Weyl, Em06-B@1#eq:fluctuation-CCR · proof attached · lines 1065–1108
Open as its own pageFor every residual state family,
Accordingly, every marginal fluctuation law is exactly the spectral law of in , and
On the common conjugated core,
For the displaced vacuum the fluctuation correlations are independent of :
When some , their CCR algebra is noncommutative. If all , this selected sector is commuting and has an ordinary Gaussian fluctuation law.
Proof. Subtract the displacement constant in (eq:displacement) and divide by . This proves the self-adjoint conjugation and hence the spectral statement. The unscaled Weyl relation gives (eq:fluctuation-Weyl); the unscaled core commutator gives (eq:fluctuation-CCR). The vacuum expectation was evaluated in Theorem thm:ordered.
sectionNormalized fluctuations: what remains quantumNormalized fluctuations: what remains quantum · lines 1108–1112
Open as its own pageIn particular, vanishing unscaled variance does not mean that normalized fluctuations have become commuting.
propositionProposition: Uncertainty retained at fluctuation scaleNormalized fluctuations: what remains quantum · Em06-B@1#prop:uncertainty, Em06-B@1#eq:uncertainty · proof attached · lines 1113–1136
Open as its own pageFor a residual state with finite number expectation,
Thus nonzero prevents both normalized variances from vanishing in any such state.
Proof. The Hilbert–Schmidt vectors
have squared norms , and inner product , by Proposition prop:covariance. Hilbert-space Cauchy–Schwarz proves the inequality.
propositionProposition: An additional hypothesis for a fluctuation limitNormalized fluctuations: what remains quantum · Em06-B@1#prop:fluctuation-limit · proof attached · lines 1138–1162
Open as its own pageSuppose, for fixed directions ,
for a density operator . Then all the ordered fluctuation expectations in (eq:fluctuation-Weyl) converge to those of . Each marginal fluctuation spectral law converges weakly to the law of in .
Trace-norm convergence alone does not imply convergence of unbounded second moments.
Proof. The operators have norm one, so the difference of their expectations is at most . The ordered phase is unchanged. Marginal characteristic functions therefore converge to the characteristic function of the stated probability law, which is continuous at zero. The usual characteristic-function criterion gives weak convergence. The final caution is demonstrated explicitly in Section sec:examples.
sectionNormalized fluctuations: what remains quantumNormalized fluctuations: what remains quantum · lines 1162–1168
Open as its own pageConcentration imposes only smallness of , not convergence of the undisplaced characteristic functions. It therefore does not supply the extra hypothesis of this proposition.
Quantitative stability of the classical inputs
sectionMetric, switch, and observation-test changesQuantitative stability of the classical inputs › Metric, switch, and observation-test changes · lines 1172–1177
Open as its own pageFor two data sets with the common supports of Specification spec:data, write , .
theoremTheorem: Explicit input-stability allowanceQuantitative stability of the classical inputs › Metric, switch, and observation-test changes · Em06-B@1#thm:input-stability, Em06-B@1#eq:input-difference, Em06-B@1#eq:bounded-input-difference, Em06-B@1#eq:switch-difference · proof attached · lines 1178–1224
Open as its own pageWith the same fixed constant type as Theorem thm:estimate,
In particular, on a family bounded by ,
The switch difference is exactly
The coordinate prescription does not vary with the switch.
Proof. The map is linear in , linear in for fixed , and its coordinate term is independent of . Subtract first the inputs, then the inputs, and finally the switches. Apply (eq:main-estimate) to the first two differences.
For the third, (eq:switch-difference) is exact. The same product-rule estimate used in Appendix app:PDE gives
Replace by . This proves both allowances.
sectionMetric, switch, and observation-test changesQuantitative stability of the classical inputs › Metric, switch, and observation-test changes · Em06-B@1#eq:symbol-stability · lines 1224–1236
Open as its own pageLet and . Then
Thus the preparation topology is explicitly the Hilbert norm, even though smooth amplitudes are used to name classical fields.
corollaryCorollary: One combined preparation–input–fluctuation ledgerQuantitative stability of the classical inputs › Metric, switch, and observation-test changes · Em06-B@1#cor:combined, Em06-B@1#eq:combined · proof attached · lines 1237–1276
Open as its own pageSuppose data converge to a fixed data set in the controls just specified and stay in a bounded input family. Let be their corresponding direction and symbol, let be the limiting symbol, and let be the law in the displaced state built from .
Define
Then
Hence proves the acceptance pair for this fixed limiting target as well.
Proof. Equation (eq:symbol-stability) bounds by . Use Theorem thm:states and the Wasserstein triangle inequality through . Bounded inputs bound , while Theorem thm:input-stability gives .
sectionMetric, switch, and observation-test changesQuantitative stability of the classical inputs › Metric, switch, and observation-test changes · lines 1276–1280
Open as its own pageThis is input stability. It is not a theorem propagating a semiclassical limit under an interacting quantum dynamics.
propositionProposition: Coherent marginal comparisonQuantitative stability of the classical inputs › Sharper coherent spectral stability · Em06-B@1#prop:Gaussian-stability, Em06-B@1#eq:Gaussian-stability · proof attached · lines 1283–1306
Open as its own pageFor two displaced-vacuum preparations with directions and means , their marginal laws satisfy
Proof. The marginal laws are . Couple them using the same real standard Gaussian. This gives the first displayed quantity as an upper bound. For any coupling, Cauchy–Schwarz bounds its covariance by the product of its standard deviations, giving the matching lower bound. The reverse triangle inequality for Hilbert norms proves the second statement.
sectionSharper coherent spectral stabilityQuantitative stability of the classical inputs › Sharper coherent spectral stability · lines 1306–1310
Open as its own pageNo comparison of noncommuting joint spectral laws is hidden in this marginal statement.
sectionA common plateau, and a controlled defect outside itQuantitative stability of the classical inputs › A common plateau, and a controlled defect outside it · Em06-B@1#eq:outside-gauge, Em06-B@1#eq:defect-bound, Em06-B@1#eq:gauge-error · lines 1311–1356
Open as its own pageExact gauge equality (eq:v-gauge) holds for every allowed switch because all share the same plateau .
For a real smooth compact supported to the future of , but not necessarily in that plateau, the exact identity is instead
Thus the represented defect direction is
If the supports of such parameters lie in a common compact source region, the same scalar-response estimate gives
where the last seminorm includes the tensor components.
In the displaced state, the difference of the represented observables has the state-relative root-mean-square bound
Indeed, displacement transforms this difference to , and the triangle inequality in the state's quadratic norm proves the estimate.
A small right-hand side is an error allowance, not exact invariance. There is no operator-norm bound for the unbounded field difference uniform over all states. Changes of initial surface or coordinate Cauchy data are excluded from the present stability theorem.
Nonzero success and explicit failure examples
propositionProposition: A nonzero classical targetNonzero success and explicit failure examples › An evaluated relational coefficient · Em06-B@1#prop:nonzero, Em06-B@1#eq:nonzero · proof attached · lines 1362–1430
Open as its own pageChoose
Let and be nonnegative and nonzero. Let be nonnegative with integral one, and set
Choose the compact switch equal to one wherever this coefficient contributes to the causal dependence region of .
Choose compact smooth scalar Cauchy data equal to on a ball containing that dependence region at . Their amplitude belongs to , and
Consequently .
Proof. Finite propagation gives throughout the observation dependence region. Direct calculation yields
On the free scalar shell there,
Hence
Subtracting , integrating by parts in , and using
gives the integrand in (eq:nonzero). Integration against proves the formula.
On the supports of and , both trigonometric factors are strictly positive. Thus the value is negative. The symbol formula (eq:classical-symbol) excludes .
Finally, compact smooth real Cauchy data have amplitude
For the displayed multipliers preserve Schwartz decay.
sectionAn evaluated relational coefficientNonzero success and explicit failure examples › An evaluated relational coefficient · lines 1430–1434
Open as its own pageThis evaluates the named relational observable, not a susceptibility, decoder statistic, or sphere contrast.
sectionNon-Gaussian preparations that concentrateNonzero success and explicit failure examples › Non-Gaussian preparations that concentrate · Em06-B@1#eq:oneparticle-variance, Em06-B@1#eq:oneparticle-characteristic · lines 1435–1469
Open as its own pageFix the nonzero direction above and . Use the Fock factorization
Let the residual state be one particle in the mode and vacuum in . Its mean field is zero, its number expectation is one, and
Therefore the displaced relational observable has exact mean and variance .
Its characteristic function is
To verify it, normal order ; between one-particle vectors only the constant and the single annihilation–creation term survive, giving . This is generally not a Gaussian law, but its distance to is exactly .
More generally every fixed Fock-normal state of finite number expectation, including finite mixtures of finite-particle vectors, satisfies (eq:number-condition). No infinite-volume thermal density is assumed to belong to this class.
sectionVariance vanishes but the named mean is wrongNonzero success and explicit failure examples › Variance vanishes but the named mean is wrong · lines 1470–1486
Open as its own pageFor real , take as residual state the coherent vector
Then , and after the declared displacement by ,
Thus the variance condition alone passes, but the mean does not converge to the named target. This is preparation bias, not a failure of the variance calculation.
sectionCentered amplified fluctuations prevent concentrationNonzero success and explicit failure examples › Centered amplified fluctuations prevent concentration · Em06-B@1#eq:squeezed, Em06-B@1#eq:squeezed-scaling · lines 1487–1528
Open as its own pageThe one-mode Schrödinger representation gives
For real , define the normalized vector
with vacuum on . Elementary Gaussian integration gives
This is an explicitly constructed Fock-normal squeezed preparation.
Take , . For the observed direction ,
Thus:
The failure at is an exact centered, nonvanishing-variance failure of the acceptance pair.
sectionThe number condition is not necessaryNonzero success and explicit failure examples › The number condition is not necessary · lines 1529–1544
Open as its own pageFor any fixed finite family , choose a unit vector orthogonal to their finite complex span. Put particles in this mode and vacuum in its orthogonal complement.
The residual number expectation is , so . Nevertheless, every , and every ordered Weyl product in these directions, acts on the vacuum factor independently of the occupied mode. All conclusions for the displaced vacuum in this finite family hold exactly. This proves that total-number control is not necessary for observable-specific concentration.
sectionConcentration does not imply a fluctuation limitNonzero success and explicit failure examples › Concentration does not imply a fluctuation limit · lines 1545–1586
Open as its own pageLet the residual state alternate between the vacuum and the one-particle state in the mode , according to the parity of . Then , so the relational coefficient concentrates on .
However, along the two parity subsequences the normalized fluctuation characteristic functions are respectively
They differ, for example at . There is no unique marginal fluctuation limit.
For a separate moment caution, let
in the same mode . This state tends to the vacuum in trace norm, but
Its normalized fluctuation laws converge weakly to the vacuum law, while their second moments do not. Moreover,
so Wasserstein concentration on fails despite the weak classical concentration caused by the vanishing mixture weight.
One declared measurement benchmark and preparation cost
sectionAn additive-noise POVM, not an apparatus claimOne declared measurement benchmark and preparation cost › An additive-noise POVM, not an apparatus claim · Em06-B@1#eq:noise-POVM · lines 1590–1612
Open as its own pageConsider one represented self-adjoint observable . Let be a classical probability law of mean zero and finite variance , independent of the system. Define the POVM
as a weak operator integral. Positivity and normalization follow from the corresponding properties of the spectral measure and ; countable additivity follows by monotone convergence.
Its outcome law is the convolution , equivalently the law of for independent variables with those laws.
propositionProposition: Intrinsic and measured concentration are differentOne declared measurement benchmark and preparation cost › An additive-noise POVM, not an apparatus claim · Em06-B@1#prop:noise, Em06-B@1#eq:measurement-budget · proof attached · lines 1613–1633
Open as its own pageFor the POVM (eq:noise-POVM),
Measured concentration on holds exactly when both nonnegative terms tend to zero. In particular, fixed nonzero detector variance prevents measured concentration even when the intrinsic acceptance pair holds.
Proof. Expand . Independence and the zero mean of eliminate the cross term. The intrinsic term is (eq:mse). Equation (eq:pointmass) gives the Wasserstein assertion.
sectionAn additive-noise POVM, not an apparatus claimOne declared measurement benchmark and preparation cost › An additive-noise POVM, not an apparatus claim · lines 1633–1640
Open as its own pageThis section constructs a mathematical POVM and its complete outcome law. It does not construct a local system–probe interaction, a postmeasurement quantum instrument, a referenced recovery channel, or an engineered detector. For noncommuting finite families it does not manufacture a joint measurement of their spectral observables.
sectionThe displaced preparation is not bounded-resourceOne declared measurement benchmark and preparation cost › The displaced preparation is not bounded-resource · Em06-B@1#eq:number-cost, Em06-B@1#eq:cost-limit · lines 1641–1665
Open as its own pageFor finite-number residual states, displacement gives
The annihilation bound implies
Therefore, under ,
For a nonzero classical preparation, the expected unscaled occupation consequently grows as . No bounded-resource implementation follows from concentration.
Release, corrections, and retained boundaries
sectionCorrections made to the proposed architectureRelease, corrections, and retained boundaries › Corrections made to the proposed architecture · lines 1669–1694
Open as its own pageThe following qualifications are necessary for the proof:
A noncommuting family has ordered Weyl correlations, not an automatically available joint spectral law.
Finite residual number expectation defines quadratic field moments, but does not automatically define every unsmeared operator product on every state vector. Covariances were defined by their quadratic forms.
Mean convergence and variance convergence are separate. Their conjunction is equivalent to convergence of the second moment about the named classical target.
The condition is sufficient, not necessary, and is a condition on residual occupation, not on the total displaced occupation.
Trace-norm convergence of residual states controls bounded Weyl functions, not unbounded moment convergence.
The test-gauge identity proves exact descent in this free scalar representation. It does not prove descent in an interacting joint gravitational quantum ideal.
Neither statements summarized for VII-I/VII-J nor a pre-existing free-product repair are needed to define the present scalar fields or their Weyl correlations.
sectionShort predecessor and non-transfer ledgerRelease, corrections, and retained boundaries › Short predecessor and non-transfer ledger · lines 1695–1785
Open as its own page{ {}1.14
Comparison Boundary retained here Comparison Boundary retained here Em06-A; VII-A Em06A,CheungVIIA The first coefficient is the starting object, but its signs, support, and scalar gauge descent are rederived. No second-order quantum result is inherited. V; VII-B; VII-I summary CheungV,CheungVIIB,Dossier An external classical metric is not a jointly quantized metric insertion. Scalar concentration neither repairs the sharp off-shell admission problem nor constructs an interacting product. Summary-only VII-I claims are not theorem premises. VII-H CheungVIIH Its free massless Wick-square susceptibility and contact ambiguity are different from the massive scalar-linear coefficient, its covariance, and its fluctuation CCR. The reported pairing is not relabelled as our variance coefficient. IX-A CheungIXA Fixed-support scalar estimates do not establish convergence in the separate boundary-sensitive carrier topology. No continuum sharp-insertion limit is inferred. XI-G CheungXIG The supplied frozen class obstruction is untouched. We construct no representative of that cubic two-metric-slot class. XIV-H/I/J; XVI-N/O CheungXIV,CheungXVI No full joint characteristic map, inherited quantum coefficient, or bulk BV restoration is supplied. No new resolution of H2, I3, or J2 is claimed; XVI-N's separate Route B is not discharged; O.1 is not closed and XV-B is not opened as an admission exit. XVII-A; En02/Em03 and other finite models XVIIA,Dossier Boundary reconstruction, packet channels, finite decoders, scheduled dependency, and other model diagnostics are non-premises. No map identifying their observables with the present coefficient is asserted. }
The XI-G comparison is especially simple at the level of types. Our construction has the form
after has been fixed classically. Its output is scalar-linear. It does not output the joint cubic kernel to which XI-G's obstruction applies. An expectation or variance estimate for this already-defined scalar operator cannot alter that class obstruction.
sectionThe optional metric gate is not enteredRelease, corrections, and retained boundaries › The optional metric gate is not entered · lines 1786–1797
Open as its own pageNo finite-mode metric oscillator extension is released in this manuscript. Thus no self-adjoint joint operator is presumed admitted.
Such an extension would require its own domain, self-adjoint realization, state moments, and classical-symbol proof. Physical graviton or constraint compatibility would remain a further identification, and a continuum or sharp-product limit would remain another theorem. B1–B5 do not depend on that optional gate.
theoremTheorem: Em06-B analytical releaseRelease, corrections, and retained boundaries › The optional metric gate is not entered · Em06-B@1#thm:release · proof attached · lines 1798–1858
Open as its own pageFor the scalar-only first coefficient and the frozen conventions of this manuscript:
B1: classical and test audit. The density, coordinate Cauchy, compact-test, support, and restricted gauge identities are proved, together with the explicit nonoptimal estimate (eq:main-estimate).
B2: finite families. Symmetric covariance and commutation are separated. Commuting families have the joint spectral theorem (eq:joint-general)–(eq:joint-vacuum); arbitrary families have the ordered Weyl theorem (eq:ordered-general)–(eq:ordered-bound).
B3: displaced-state concentration. The exact observable-specific criterion is . Finite residual number moments with give uniform mean, variance, mean-square, and spectral concentration.
B4: input control. Metric, switch, observation-test, and preparation changes have the allowances (eq:input-difference)–(eq:combined). Exact gauge equality stays inside the common plateau; the outside-plateau defect has a separate error estimate.
B5: fluctuation scale. Normalized fluctuations have the exact residual-state representation (eq:fluctuation-conjugation) and CCR (eq:fluctuation-CCR). A fluctuation limit requires further state information; concentration alone is insufficient.
A nonzero relational target, non-Gaussian success, distinct bias and variance failures, and failure of a unique fluctuation limit are explicitly evaluated. The additive-noise POVM has the exact measurement allowance (eq:measurement-budget).
The ending is Constructed: the scalar-only B1–B5 package. The optional metric gate B6 is not entered.
Proof. Propositions prop:test–prop:gauge, Lemma lem:mass-shell, Theorem thm:estimate, and Appendix app:PDE establish B1. Proposition prop:covariance and Theorems thm:commuting–thm:ordered establish B2. Theorem thm:states and Corollary cor:uniform establish B3. Theorem thm:input-stability, Corollary cor:combined, and (eq:outside-gauge)–(eq:gauge-error) establish B4. Theorem thm:fluctuations and Propositions prop:uncertainty–prop:fluctuation-limit establish B5. Section sec:examples gives the stated examples, and Proposition prop:noise proves the measurement allowance.
sectionThe optional metric gate is not enteredRelease, corrections, and retained boundaries › The optional metric gate is not entered · lines 1858–1877
Open as its own pagespacetime emergence. The Minkowski causal structure, metric coefficient, scalar equation, initial surface, switch, harmonic prescription, and preparation are inputs. The proof reconstructs none of them from entanglement. It derives no Einstein equation and supplies no holographic map. Nor does it propagate a nonlinear interacting semiclassical limit, remove a regulator, or calculate gravitational backreaction. Classical concentration of these observables and survival of their normalized quantum fluctuations are the complete claims.
boundary. All released conclusions are analytical. Compilation, numerical or symbolic execution, independent-reader verification, machine verification, laboratory calibration, implementation, and registration are not asserted.
Detailed PDE estimates and derivative accounting
sectionDetailed PDE estimates and derivative accountingDetailed PDE estimates and derivative accounting · lines 1879–1885
Open as its own pageThis appendix supplies the estimates used in Theorem thm:estimate. All norms of vector and tensor functions are taken componentwise; fixed finite component factors are absorbed into constants.
sectionElementary Sobolev and propagator boundsDetailed PDE estimates and derivative accounting › Elementary Sobolev and propagator bounds · Em06-B@1#eq:Sobolev · lines 1886–1917
Open as its own pageFor the spatial Sobolev norm
Fourier inversion and Cauchy–Schwarz give
Indeed, . Spatially differentiated versions follow by applying the same inequality to the derivative.
For , including ,
At zero frequency the sine quotient is its continuous value . Also is bounded, with a constant depending on .
If is spatially supported in a fixed ball, its integer Sobolev norm at each time is bounded by a fixed-volume constant times the maximum of its spatial derivatives of the required order. This also holds for its time derivatives.
sectionThe advanced scalar responseDetailed PDE estimates and derivative accounting › The advanced scalar response · Em06-B@1#eq:u-basic, Em06-B@1#eq:u-time, Em06-B@1#eq:u-C4 · lines 1918–1958
Open as its own pageFor ,
The propagator estimates imply
The equation and its derivatives give
For with , apply (eq:Sobolev) to its spatial norm. If or , (eq:u-basic) suffices with spatial orders at most six. If , use (eq:u-time); each additional costs two spatial derivatives, but the allowed spatial order decreases with . Every resulting derivative of has total order at most six. For example, when , the largest spatial term is in , controlled by in . The term in uses total order four. Consequently
sectionLocal metric control for the coordinate responseDetailed PDE estimates and derivative accounting › Local metric control for the coordinate response · Em06-B@1#eq:Fh, Em06-B@1#eq:w-C3 · lines 1959–2021
Open as its own pageChoose once and for all
Let , and let solve (eq:w) with this coefficient. Every backward causal cone from down to lies within . Hence finite propagation gives
on an open neighborhood of , including equality of all the derivatives used below. The extra unit in the cutoff radius provides that neighborhood.
Put . It has a fixed compact spatial support, and the product rule gives
The coordinate solution obeys
and therefore
Its higher time derivatives are
Apply the spatial embedding to derivatives of total order at most three. The largest required spatial source norm is , from three spatial derivatives of . The other terms are covered by (eq:Fh). Thus
The same estimate holds on the fixed small neighborhood of used for the product derivatives.
The localization is essential: it permits arbitrary smooth nondecaying outside , while the estimate uses only on . No global Sobolev assumption on is made.
sectionThe compact test and its stabilityDetailed PDE estimates and derivative accounting › The compact test and its stability · lines 2022–2063
Open as its own pageWrite . In expanded form,
Taking at most two further spacetime derivatives uses at most three derivatives of and four derivatives of . Since has support in ,
Taking at most two derivatives of uses at most three derivatives of on the support of . Equation (eq:w-C3) therefore gives
Adding these inequalities proves
The mass-shell estimate completes Theorem thm:estimate.
The same proof, without a coordinate term, gives for any smooth compact tensor on a common source support
This is the estimate used for switch differences and for the outside-plateau defect. The support geometry, mass, and time slab remain fixed. Constants are not claimed uniform in support growth, , or .
Convention, support, and evidence audit
sectionConvention, support, and evidence auditConvention, support, and evidence audit · lines 2065–2163
Open as its own page{ {}1.14
Item Audited calculation Support or convention Item Audited calculation Support or convention Density variation Variation of (eq:action) gives ; expansion gives (eq:Q-expanded). Signature ; ; trace–mass term retained. Scalar response . Compact source separated from ; retarded sign fixed in (eq:Green). Coordinate response , zero at . Unswitched; coordinate-time data; localized estimate uses only on . Compact test Green transposition and two compact integrations by parts give (eq:q). Coefficient factors are compact; no time-truncated distribution is substituted for a smooth test. Gauge identity , , then (eq:test-gauge). compact in the common plateau and away from . Classical pairing Fourier integration gives . Unitary spatial Fourier transform; inner product linear in its second argument. Quantum fields Number-form bound, analytic vectors, Weyl identities. antilinear; ; closures and form moments explicitly specified. Ordering phase Repeated Weyl multiplication gives . Factors ordered by increasing index; no noncommuting joint spectral law. }
ledger. Analytical derivations are supplied in this text. No symbolic expansion script, numerical witness evaluation, validated floating-point enclosure, compilation log, second-reader audit, or machine-checking report is supplied or claimed. Bibliographic searches did not provide accessible full texts for the additional VII-I comparison. Accordingly, its summary-only labels are not promoted to premises. This limitation does not leave a mathematical gap in B1–B5, whose required formulas and estimates are proved here.
bibliographyReferencesConvention, support, and evidence audit · lines 2164–2334
Open as its own pageEm06A
One declared classical-limit package for a relational observable, and the stops it does not close: Em06-A, a scalar-only coherent limit of the first plateau coefficient. Draft supplied in the conversation, n.d. Relevant formulas: compact scalar test, plateau descent, displaced vacuum mean and variance, and the nonzero preparation-response example. No authorship, publication, or registration metadata beyond the supplied draft are assumed.
CheungVIIA
N. Cheung, Manuscript VII-A, version 1, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion; supplied excerpt. Relevant locator:
thm:first, lines 973–1012. Exact first-order plateau repair. The conventions and identities required here are rederived.CheungVIIB
N. Cheung, Manuscript VII-B, version 1, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion; supplied excerpt. Relevant locator:
thm:main, lines 924–985. Sharp-boundary obstruction on its declared joint off-shell domain.CheungV
N. Cheung, Manuscript V, version 1, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion; supplied excerpts. Relevant locators:
eq:mixedcore,eq:nonlocalcomm, and scope/non-goals. External-metric, finite-oscillator, and composed-response objects remain distinct.CheungVIIH
N. Cheung, Manuscript VII-H, version 1, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion; supplied excerpt. Relevant locator:
thm:release, lines 1748–1780. Free massless Wick-square response, finite normalization class , and the reported invariant pairing. Comparison only.CheungIXA
N. Cheung, Manuscript IX-A, version 1, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion; supplied excerpt. Relevant locator:
thm:IX1, lines 1264–1302. Failure of convergence for unchanged regular approximants in the declared boundary-sensitive topology. Comparison only.CheungXIG
N. Cheung, Manuscript XI-G, version 1, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion; supplied excerpts. Relevant locators:
def:class, lines 576–589;thm:criterion, lines 1036–1069;thm:obstruction, lines 1189–1216. The frozen free-shell class obstruction is not altered here.CheungXIV
N. Cheung, Manuscripts XIV-H, XIV-I, and XIV-J, version 1 manuscripts, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion; supplied excerpts. Relevant locators: XIV-H
thm:H2; XIV-Ithm:I2,thm:I3; XIV-Jthm:J2,cor:noadmission, andthm:release. Grouped only for the non-transfer ledger; not mathematical premises.CheungXVI
N. Cheung, Manuscripts XVI-N and XVI-O, n.d. Supplied revisions: XVI-N r12; XVI-O o70-sync. Enter Calculus Companion; supplied excerpts. Relevant locators: XVI-N
thm:massless-obstruction; XVI-Orem:three-verdictsand status ledger. The separate completion route and bulk O.1 are not discharged.XVIIA
XVII-A: One boundary reconstruction is not holographic emergence. Supplied file
XVII-A.tex, n.d. Finite-matrix massless-scalar benchmark on an assumed background. No publication or registration metadata are inferred.Dossier
Em06-B development plan and accompanying manuscript-comparison dossier. Material supplied with the question, n.d. In particular, the added VII-I/VII-J theorem-label descriptions are summary-level comparison material, not full independently audited source proofs. Other finite-model and repair-route descriptions are used only to record non-premise boundaries.
Glauber
R. J. Glauber, Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field, Physical Review 131 (1963), 2766–2788. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766.
Hepp
K. Hepp, The classical limit for quantum mechanical correlation functions, Communications in Mathematical Physics 35 (1974), 265–277. doi:10.1007/BF01646348.
Nelson
E. Nelson, Analytic vectors, Annals of Mathematics (2) 70 (1959), 572–615. doi:10.2307/1970331.
BGP
C. Bär, N. Ginoux, and F. Pfäffle, Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization. ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, European Mathematical Society, 2007. doi:10.4171/037. arXiv:0806.1036.
ANphase
Z. Ammari and F. Nier, Mean field limit for bosons and infinite dimensional phase-space analysis, Annales Henri Poincaré 9 (2008), 1503–1574. doi:10.1007/s00023-008-0393-5. arXiv:0711.4128. General semiclassical background, not a premise of the observable-specific estimates.
ANgeneral
Z. Ammari and F. Nier, Mean field propagation of Wigner measures and BBGKY hierarchies for general bosonic states. arXiv:1003.2054. Comparison for broader state classes and the distinction between Weyl and Wick calculi in infinite dimension.
ANpropagation
Z. Ammari and F. Nier, Mean field limit for bosons and propagation of Wigner measures, Journal of Mathematical Physics 50 (2009), 042107. doi:10.1063/1.3115046. arXiv:0807.3108. Dynamical comparison only.
BenArous
G. Ben Arous, K. Kirkpatrick, and B. Schlein, A Central Limit Theorem in Many-Body Quantum Dynamics. arXiv:1111.6999. Dynamical fluctuation comparison only; the present fluctuation identities are fixed-input exact conjugations.