All manuscripts

Manuscript XX-B@1 · XX-B.tex · 56d708a5

XX-B Coupled Gauge-Fixed Free Input for the Original-Rod Lapse A Q1 Construction on the Frozen XX-A Background

Export XX-B.tex

Specifies version 1 of a compact-test gauge-fixed free input for that original-rod lapse, not a positive physical state and not spacetime emergence. lem:H converts the Euler linearization to the action Hessian. thm:NH is normal hyperbolicity after the fiber normalization r=M^2/2. thm:greens and thm:full-green construct causal Green matrices, including auxiliary and ghost sectors. thm:contractions supplies an algebraic Hadamard class, not a positive physical state. thm:lapse retains the classical rod term and the absence of the second spatial rod from the quadratic lapse. def:closure limits Q1 to the compact-test free multiplet. Rods are elliptic functionals, not propagating fields. The Newton inverse is spatial, not retarded. Retarded reachability is not the compact gauge group. Q2 through Q5 stay unclosed. XX-A, Em02-E, VI, XIX-D, XVIII-A, XVI-Q, and the OpenAI catalogue are documentary source records and are not premises. This is not a derivation of a cognitive construct. This is not holographic identification. This is not metric reconstruction, not Einstein dynamics, not a Page curve, and not spacetime emergence. The inherited full characteristic map is not constructed. It does not repair XI-G. It does not close O.1. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. The series Route B is not discharged. XVI-N is not discharged. XV-B is not opened. XVI-P is registered and is not a premise. XIV-I's narrower I2 advance is not withdrawn. H2, I3, and J2 stay unresolved. Full spacetime emergence is not constructed. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted. Numerical execution is not asserted. Independent execution is not asserted. A source record is not a premise.

Front matter

  • abstractAbstractFront matter · lines 100–134
    Open as its own page

    We construct the coupled gauge-fixed free input for the original-rod lapse variant explicitly frozen in XX-A. The background, scalar calibration, positive lapse branch, slice-harmonic rods, decaying spatial boundary condition, and factorial perturbation convention are retained and reproduced.

    The Einstein–scalar Euler linearization is converted to its correctly normalized action Hessian. A generalized de Donder gauge, with a specified auxiliary-field normalization, gives a reduced operator whose principal part is an invertible fiber matrix times the background wave operator. After fiber normalization it is normally hyperbolic. Retarded and advanced inverses are constructed on the open finite-time slab, and the complete auxiliary–ghost inverse is obtained by an exact block calculation. Causal intertwining identities and wavefront bounds are proved.

    A nonempty class of normalized Hadamard contraction matrices is constructed using exact Feynman inverses for the resulting bundle operators. The construction is algebraic: positivity on the physical quotient, spatial-tail estimates for the lapse, and an exact BRST-invariant symmetric covariance are not claimed. The complete second-order classical field equations and the embedding, induced-metric, clock, and rod contributions to the lapse are displayed. The second spatial rod is constructed and its absence from the quadratic lapse is retained.

    Q1 is closed for the compact-test, gauge-fixed free-input target defined in this paper. This does not close Q2–Q5 for the nonlocal relational lapse, identify the variant with every native Em02-E convention, or admit an inherited characteristic quantum coefficient. No quantum evolution without external time, regulator removal, bulk symmetry restoration, or compilation is asserted.

Target, mathematical inputs, and scope

  • sectionThe target actually constructedTarget, mathematical inputs, and scope › The target actually constructed · lines 143–173
    Open as its own page

    XX-A froze an explicit original-rod lapse variant on a power-law Einstein–scalar background XXA. This paper constructs its free gauge-fixed field input. It does not reconstruct an unavailable interacting calculation.

    The target consists of:

    1. the coupled metric–scalar action Hessian and a fixed gauge-fixing realization;

    2. the auxiliary and ghost sectors, including their signs and normalization;

    3. retarded and advanced inverses on compact spacetime tests;

    4. a normalized Hadamard contraction matrix on that same free field system;

    5. the classical principal-symbol comparison with the independently displayed original-rod lapse.

    Here “normalized contraction” means a specified field-equation and graded canonical-commutation normalization with a stated microlocal singularity class. It does not mean a positive physical state or a chosen cosmological vacuum.

    The original rods are derived coordinate functionals. They do not appear as additional propagating variables in the invariant bulk action. Their spatial inverse is supplied separately. Consequently, “original-rod Green distributions” must not mean that the Newton inverse is replaced by a retarded spacetime inverse.

  • sectionDeclared analytic inputsTarget, mathematical inputs, and scope › Declared analytic inputs · lines 174–200
    Open as its own page

    We use two published analytic results as explicit mathematical inputs, after checking their hypotheses:

    1. The Cauchy and Green-operator theorems for normally hyperbolic bundle operators on globally hyperbolic spacetimes: BGP (Theorem 3.2.11 and Corollary 3.4.3).

    2. The bundle-valued Feynman-parametrix and exact Hadamard-bisolution construction: IS (Theorems 1.2 and 1.4). Only the existence and microlocal conclusions are used. No positivity conclusion for an indefinite bundle pairing is imported.

    Hack's Einstein–Klein–Gordon construction and the BFHPR relational framework are comparison templates Hack,BFHPR. Their particular gauges, state choices, and observable definitions are not substituted for the definitions below.

    The supplied Cheung records provide version-qualified comparisons and audit shapes CheungEm02E,CheungXVIIIA,CheungXIXC, CheungXIXD. Their unprinted proofs and documentary relationship edges are not premises.

  • sectionStanding nontransfer conventionTarget, mathematical inputs, and scope › Standing nontransfer convention · lines 201–216
    Open as its own page

    For all predecessor-series comparisons,

    This convention does not prohibit using the equations explicitly frozen and proved in the present manuscript. It prohibits treating a documentary relationship as a theorem or a prescription identification.

    The construction remains on a fixed background with external cosmic time. No field-dependent coordinate map removes that external structure from the free quantum construction.

The complete background and classical prescription

  • sectionAction and on-shell backgroundThe complete background and classical prescription › Action and on-shell background · XX-B@1#eq:action, XX-B@1#eq:background, XX-B@1#eq:metric, XX-B@1#eq:potential · lines 221–277
    Open as its own page

    Use signature , a reduced Planck mass , and

    On noncompact slices, this notation specifies the local action density and its compactly supported variations. No finite total background action is assumed.

    Fix , , , and

    The spacetime is

    There are no timelike or spacelike boundary conditions at the missing endpoints . The interval is open.

    Write

    The background solves :

    The scalar equation follows from . Also

  • lemmaLemma: Global hyperbolicity of the open slabThe complete background and classical prescription › Action and on-shell background · XX-B@1#lem:GH · proof attached · lines 278–296
    Open as its own page

    Every surface , , is a Cauchy surface of .

    Proof. Conformal time , defined by , identifies the metric conformally with Minkowski space on an open time interval. Along a causal curve, . If an inextendible causal curve had a time endpoint strictly inside , this estimate would give a finite spatial endpoint, and the curve could be extended. Its time range therefore crosses every , exactly once for a future-directed causal curve after the usual harmless removal of constant parameter intervals.

  • sectionPerturbations, clock, and lapseThe complete background and classical prescription › Perturbations, clock, and lapse · XX-B@1#eq:jet, XX-B@1#eq:clock, XX-B@1#eq:raw-lapse, XX-B@1#eq:clock-jet, XX-B@1#eq:theta · lines 298–347
    Open as its own page

    Retain the factorial convention

    The classical coefficient fields are smooth and have a common compact spatial support on each compact time interval used in the observable calculation. They need not solve the perturbed Euler equations.

    The field-dependent cosmic label is

    The raw matter-scalar lapse, on the positive branch, is

    It is not silently replaced by the lapse calibrated to . The two normalizations satisfy

    Let invert the clock at fixed spatial coordinate. Then

    All inverse coefficients are evaluated at .

  • sectionOriginal rods and their separate spatial inverseThe complete background and classical prescription › Original rods and their separate spatial inverse · XX-B@1#eq:induced, XX-B@1#eq:rods, XX-B@1#eq:gamma1, XX-B@1#eq:gamma2, XX-B@1#eq:B1, XX-B@1#eq:B2, XX-B@1#eq:Newton, XX-B@1#eq:Y1, XX-B@1#eq:Y2 · lines 348–422
    Open as its own page

    On each clock slice, use the induced metric

    The original rods are defined by

    There is no lapse weight in this equation.

    Write

    The complete embedding contributions are

    Define

    Then

    The spatial inverse is

    For ,

  • lemmaLemma: Spatial rod realizationThe complete background and classical prescription › Original rods and their separate spatial inverse · XX-B@1#lem:rod-realization · proof attached · lines 423–440
    Open as its own page

    Equations (eq:Y1)–(eq:Y2) give unique smooth decaying rod coefficients on the stated classical domain. They are on compact time intervals.

    Proof. Both sources are divergences of compact smooth spatial vectors. For the second source, is compact because is compact. Newton convolution gives smooth solutions. Integration by parts transfers one derivative to the Newton kernel and yields the bound.

    The difference of two decaying solutions is entire harmonic and tends to zero at infinity. The maximum principle on successively larger balls makes it zero.

  • sectionOriginal rods and their separate spatial inverseThe complete background and classical prescription › Original rods and their separate spatial inverse · lines 440–445
    Open as its own page

    This elliptic realization is retained unchanged. No hyperbolic Green theorem removes its spatial boundary condition.

The coupled Euler operator and the normalized action Hessian

  • sectionBundles, pairings, and gauge generatorThe coupled Euler operator and the normalized action Hessian › Bundles, pairings, and gauge generator · XX-B@1#eq:pair0, XX-B@1#eq:pair1, XX-B@1#eq:K, XX-B@1#eq:Kadj · lines 450–488
    Open as its own page

    Let

    Use to identify vector and covector gauge descriptors. For , , and , the integrated pairings are

    These pairings are nondegenerate, not positive definite. Complexification uses their Hermitian versions.

    Set . The gauge generator is

    where is the background covariant derivative. Its adjoint is

  • sectionFull linearizationThe coupled Euler operator and the normalized action Hessian › Full linearization · XX-B@1#eq:Gamma1, XX-B@1#eq:R1, XX-B@1#eq:Rscalar1, XX-B@1#eq:G1, XX-B@1#eq:T1, XX-B@1#eq:scalar1, XX-B@1#eq:H, XX-B@1#eq:S2 · lines 489–553
    Open as its own page

    The first curvature variations are

    The matter variations are

    All potentials in these expressions are evaluated at .

    The coupled action Hessian is the operator

    The metric factor is essential. It follows from

    At an on-shell background, the variations of the volume and of the indices multiplying contribute no extra term to the second variation. Therefore

    is the actual quadratic action.

  • lemmaLemma: Self-adjointness and invariant gauge kernelThe coupled Euler operator and the normalized action Hessian › Full linearization · XX-B@1#lem:H, XX-B@1#eq:HK · proof attached · lines 554–569
    Open as its own page

    The operator is formally self-adjoint with respect to , and

    Proof. Self-adjointness is symmetry of the second variation on compact variations. Covariance of the Euler equations and the on-shell background give . Taking the formal adjoint gives the second identity.

  • sectionFull linearizationThe coupled Euler operator and the normalized action Hessian › Full linearization · lines 569–575
    Open as its own page

    The raw Euler map, the action Hessian, and its fiber-normalized wave operator are different maps. Their inverses must not be identified without the factors displayed below.

The complete second-order classical field equations

  • sectionThe complete second-order classical field equationsThe complete second-order classical field equations · XX-B@1#eq:J, XX-B@1#eq:C, XX-B@1#eq:R2, XX-B@1#eq:Rscalar2, XX-B@1#eq:G2, XX-B@1#eq:U, XX-B@1#eq:T2, XX-B@1#eq:A, XX-B@1#eq:scalar2 · lines 577–672
    Open as its own page

    This section supplies a finite coefficient algorithm for the quadratic Einstein–scalar terms. It also fixes what “through quadratic order” means. No nonlinear differential operator is being assigned a linear Green inverse.

    Define

    For the jet (eq:jet), the inverse metric coefficients are

    The connection difference coefficients are

    Thus

    Put , . For ,

    Write , , and . Then

    For the scalar equation, define

    Its complete second coefficient is

  • propositionProposition: Complete two-jet Euler expansionThe complete second-order classical field equations · XX-B@1#prop:Euler2 · proof attached · lines 673–709
    Open as its own page

    Equations (eq:J)–(eq:scalar2), together with (eq:Gamma1)–(eq:scalar1), give every coefficient of the coupled Euler equations through . The second coefficient separates uniquely into the linear operator applied to and a homogeneous quadratic source in .

    Proof. The exact connection-difference formula is

    Its Taylor expansion gives (eq:C). The exact curvature-difference formula is its covariant derivative plus the two connection products in (eq:R2). Contracting with the inverse metric gives the scalar curvature coefficients.

    Expanding the stress tensor gives (eq:U) and (eq:T2). Finally,

    gives (eq:A) and (eq:scalar2). Every occurrence of is linear; setting them to zero leaves the homogeneous quadratic source.

  • sectionThe complete second-order classical field equationsThe complete second-order classical field equations · lines 709–715
    Open as its own page

    Rods do not add terms to these bulk equations. Their complete contributions belong to the insertion, and are retained in Sections sec:freeze and sec:lapse.

Gauge fixing and the normally hyperbolic realization

  • sectionGauge condition and auxiliary normalizationGauge fixing and the normally hyperbolic realization › Gauge condition and auxiliary normalization · XX-B@1#eq:F, XX-B@1#eq:beta, XX-B@1#eq:BRST, XX-B@1#eq:Psi, XX-B@1#eq:Sgf, XX-B@1#eq:Qdef, XX-B@1#eq:Fadj, XX-B@1#eq:Q · lines 720–787
    Open as its own page

    Retain XX-A's gauge-condition candidate:

    Fix

    Thus a previously unspecified positive gauge parameter is now fixed; the rod prescription is not changed.

    The free graded fields are

    with even and odd. Set

    The gauge fermion and quadratic action are

    The odd Leibniz rule gives the ghost sign in (eq:Sgf). Since , and on the off-shell free multiplet.

    Let

    Its adjoint and the adjoint of are

    The ghost operator is explicitly

    It is normally hyperbolic and formally self-adjoint for .

  • sectionReduced bosonic operatorGauge fixing and the normally hyperbolic realization › Reduced bosonic operator · XX-B@1#eq:Bbulk, XX-B@1#eq:Amap · lines 788–814
    Open as its own page

    The auxiliary equation is . Eliminating gives

    Its operator is

    Define the four-dimensional trace reversal

    and the parallel invertible fiber map

  • theoremTheorem: Normally hyperbolic coupled realizationGauge fixing and the normally hyperbolic realization › Reduced bosonic operator · XX-B@1#thm:NH, XX-B@1#eq:L · proof attached · lines 815–858
    Open as its own page

    The operator

    has differential principal part . All its lower-order coefficients are smooth on . It is formally self-adjoint for the nondegenerate pairing

    Proof. The second-derivative part of the linearized Einstein tensor is

    Therefore the metric block of has second-derivative part

    The second-derivative part of is . Equation (eq:beta) cancels it exactly.

    The scalar block has principal part . Mixed metric–scalar entries have at most one derivative: the background scalar gradient and its derivatives are fixed coefficients. The scalar term in likewise creates only first- and zeroth-order mixed entries.

    Thus . All coefficients are smooth because stays away from zero. Finally, is self-adjoint for ; using proves the asserted weighted self-adjointness.

  • sectionReduced bosonic operatorGauge fixing and the normally hyperbolic realization › Reduced bosonic operator · lines 858–863
    Open as its own page

    This proves hyperbolicity for the actual displayed gauge and normalization. It does not rely on identifying this operator with Hack's differently presented operator.

  • propositionProposition: Residual transformations in the frozen groupGauge fixing and the normally hyperbolic realization › Residual gauges and boundary discipline · XX-B@1#prop:residual · proof attached · lines 866–881
    Open as its own page

    Within XX-A's compactly supported spacetime gauge group, the linear residual gauge condition is

    and its only solution is .

    Proof. A compact spacetime support lies strictly to the future of some Cauchy surface in the slab. Both Cauchy data of vanish there. Uniqueness for the normally hyperbolic operator gives zero.

  • sectionResidual gauges and boundary disciplineGauge fixing and the normally hyperbolic realization › Residual gauges and boundary discipline · lines 881–900
    Open as its own page

    There are nonzero homogeneous -solutions with general spacelike-compact Cauchy data. They are not compactly supported spacetime transformations of the frozen group.

    Likewise, the retarded solution of need not be compact in time. It does not prove that every configuration has a gauge-fixed representative inside XX-A's compact spacetime group. The gauge-fixed action is defined independently of that unproved reachability claim.

    Compact admitted diffeomorphisms preserve the asymptotic rod labels. Their pullbacks preserve the timelike character of a classical scalar gradient and its chosen branch locally around the background. The gauge condition does not itself enforce a pointwise positive quantum lapse.

Retarded and advanced Green distributions

  • sectionReduced inversesRetarded and advanced Green distributions › Reduced inverses · lines 905–910
    Open as its own page

    Write , for the retarded and advanced Green operators, respectively. The superscripts and mean retarded and advanced throughout.

  • theoremTheorem: Existence, normalization, and supportRetarded and advanced Green distributions › Reduced inverses · XX-B@1#thm:greens, XX-B@1#eq:GB · proof attached · lines 911–953
    Open as its own page

    There are unique continuous operators

    with the left and right inverse identities and

    The correctly normalized reduced action inverse is

    Moreover,

    Proof. Lemma lem:GH verifies global hyperbolicity. The bundles have finite rank and smooth coefficients. Theorem thm:NH and (eq:Q) verify normal hyperbolicity. No boundary or positivity assumption is needed. The Green theorem BGP (Corollary 3.4.3) therefore applies.

    The inverse identities in (eq:GB) follow from . The fiber map is local and invertible, so it changes neither support nor wavefront relations. Formal self-adjointness, integration by parts, and uniqueness give the adjoint identities.

  • sectionReduced inversesRetarded and advanced Green distributions › Reduced inverses · lines 953–968
    Open as its own page

    The corresponding distribution kernels use the background volume normalization:

    In the displayed coordinates,

  • sectionAn explicit continuous-momentum representationRetarded and advanced Green distributions › An explicit continuous-momentum representation · XX-B@1#eq:mode, XX-B@1#eq:mode-ret, XX-B@1#eq:mode-adv · lines 969–1008
    Open as its own page

    Choose the global coframe . Spatial homogeneity writes either normalized operator as

    The matrices are obtained directly from (eq:H), (eq:Fadj), (eq:Bbulk), (eq:Amap), and (eq:Q); this is an exact coordinate representation, not a new operator.

    For each , let be the matrix solution of

    Then

    The integrals are distributional Fourier integrals.

  • proofProof: VerificationRetarded and advanced Green distributions › An explicit continuous-momentum representation · lines 1009–1019
    Open as its own page

    Proof. The time-derivative jump is , so the leading produces the correctly normalized delta. Ordinary matrix ODE uniqueness supplies the mode functions. On compact time intervals, the usual wave-equation energy estimate bounds the Fourier-mode solutions and their fixed derivatives by polynomial momentum weights. Thus the formulas define distributions on compact tests. Their time support, inverse equations, and Green uniqueness identify them with Theorem thm:greens.

  • sectionAn explicit continuous-momentum representationRetarded and advanced Green distributions › An explicit continuous-momentum representation · lines 1019–1024
    Open as its own page

    This is an exact continuous-momentum representation. No finite-mode approximation or finite-register continuum limit is used.

  • sectionCausal intertwining identitiesRetarded and advanced Green distributions › Causal intertwining identities · lines 1025–1032
    Open as its own page

    Define

  • propositionProposition: Exact gauge–Green normalizationRetarded and advanced Green distributions › Causal intertwining identities · XX-B@1#prop:intertwining, XX-B@1#eq:operator-intertwine, XX-B@1#eq:green-intertwine · proof attached · lines 1033–1060
    Open as its own page

    On compact tests,

    The same identities hold for the causal differences.

    Proof. The first line follows from , , and self-adjointness. For a compact test , both and solve the same inhomogeneous -equation and have the same retarded or advanced support. Uniqueness gives the first Green identity. Taking adjoints gives the second.

  • sectionCausal intertwining identitiesRetarded and advanced Green distributions › Causal intertwining identities · lines 1060–1070
    Open as its own page

    If , then

    In particular, invariant sources and zero subsidiary Cauchy data preserve . This is a free subsidiary-equation statement, not an interacting lapse Ward identity.

  • sectionComplete auxiliary and ghost inverseRetarded and advanced Green distributions › Complete auxiliary and ghost inverse · XX-B@1#eq:even-operator, XX-B@1#eq:odd-operator · lines 1071–1089
    Open as its own page

    The even quadratic operator on is

    With left/right Grassmann derivatives fixed by , the odd matrix on is

  • theoremTheorem: Full free-multiplet Green matricesRetarded and advanced Green distributions › Complete auxiliary and ghost inverse · XX-B@1#thm:full-green, XX-B@1#eq:even-green, XX-B@1#eq:odd-green · proof attached · lines 1090–1133
    Open as its own page

    The complete retarded and advanced inverses are

    \mathbb G_{\mathrm{ev}}^\pm
     &=\begin{pmatrix}
           G_{\mathcal B}^\pm&K G_Q^\pm\\
           G_Q^\pm K^\dagger&0
       \end{pmatrix},
     \label{eq:even-green}\\
     \mathbb G_{\mathrm{odd}}^\pm
     &=\begin{pmatrix}
           0&-G_Q^\pm\\
           G_Q^\pm&0
       \end{pmatrix}.
     \label{eq:odd-green}

    They are left and right inverses on compact tests, with causal support in every component.

    Proof. The Schur complement of the lower-right even block is . Its formal block inverse is

    Proposition prop:intertwining converts the off-diagonal blocks to those in (eq:even-green). The lower-right block equals

    Direct multiplication verifies both inverse identities. The odd inverse is verified by matrix multiplication. Differential operators are local, so all blocks retain the corresponding causal support.

  • sectionComplete auxiliary and ghost inverseRetarded and advanced Green distributions › Complete auxiliary and ghost inverse · lines 1133–1138
    Open as its own page

    The vanishing Green block is a result of the exact calculation. It is not an omission of an auxiliary contact term.

Wavefront bounds and the separation of hyperbolic and elliptic support

  • sectionWavefront bounds and the separation of hyperbolic and elliptic supportWavefront bounds and the separation of hyperbolic and elliptic support · lines 1141–1159
    Open as its own page

    Let denote the kernel wavefront relation with the second covector reversed. Define

    where means transport along a null bicharacteristic. Let restrict to the causal future/past of , and let

  • propositionProposition: Bulk and multiplet wavefront boundsWavefront bounds and the separation of hyperbolic and elliptic support · XX-B@1#prop:WF, XX-B@1#eq:greenWF, XX-B@1#eq:causalWF · proof attached · lines 1160–1187
    Open as its own page

    For ,

    Every component of the full Green matrices has the same corresponding upper bound.

    Proof. Away from coincidence, the inverse equation is homogeneous. The normally hyperbolic principal symbol gives null propagation. The diagonal inverse singularity is conormal to the diagonal; the retarded or advanced support chooses the corresponding directed null relation. This is the bundle-valued distinguished-parametrix construction IS.

    In the causal difference the inhomogeneous diagonal source cancels. Elliptic regularity excludes non-null covectors. Multiplication by , and application of the differential operators in the full matrices, do not enlarge the wavefront set.

  • sectionWavefront bounds and the separation of hyperbolic and elliptic supportWavefront bounds and the separation of hyperbolic and elliptic support · XX-B@1#eq:spkernel, XX-B@1#eq:spWF · lines 1187–1211
    Open as its own page

    A retarded Green distribution can have a smooth tail inside the light cone. The wavefront bound does not assert support only on the null cone.

    By contrast, the spatial rod kernel is

    At distinct spatial endpoints,

    Indeed the nonzero smooth spatial factor preserves the wavefront set of the time delta.

  • corollaryCorollary: No retarded replacement of the original rodsWavefront bounds and the separation of hyperbolic and elliptic support · XX-B@1#cor:no-ret-rods · proof attached · lines 1212–1225
    Open as its own page

    The original rod inverse has instantaneous off-diagonal spatial support and temporal conormal singularities. It is not one of the causal inverses in Theorem thm:full-green.

    Proof. Equation (eq:spkernel) is nonzero for arbitrary distinct spatial endpoints on the same time slice, whereas distinct same-time spatial points are spacelike for . A retarded or advanced bulk kernel vanishes there.

  • sectionWavefront bounds and the separation of hyperbolic and elliptic supportWavefront bounds and the separation of hyperbolic and elliptic support · lines 1225–1232
    Open as its own page

    Thus Q1 supplies the propagating field input and retains the actual classical elliptic coordinate construction. It does not falsify that construction by imposing causal support on its spatial inverse.

Normalized Hadamard contraction data

  • sectionExact inverses, not positivity by terminologyNormalized Hadamard contraction data › Exact inverses, not positivity by terminology · lines 1237–1256
    Open as its own page

    The pairings used for and are indefinite. An algebraic Hadamard contraction can nevertheless be constructed. Positivity on a physical quotient is a different problem.

    For a real self-adjoint action operator , choose an exact Feynman inverse such that

    on compact tests. Choose the Feynman orientation for which has positive-frequency Hadamard wavefront. This is the convention appropriate to the action operator whose scalar principal differential part is , with signature . Under the opposite operator-sign convention, the familiar formula has the opposite prefactor.

  • lemmaLemma: Existence of the required exact Feynman inversesNormalized Hadamard contraction data › Exact inverses, not positivity by terminology · XX-B@1#lem:Feynman · proof attached · lines 1257–1285
    Open as its own page

    The choices above exist. For , they are obtained from the normally hyperbolic operator by

    They can be symmetrized under the real formal transpose without changing their exact inverse equations or their Feynman wavefront class.

    Proof. The operators are smooth, normally hyperbolic after the displayed fiber normalization, and formally self-adjoint for nondegenerate Hermitian bundle pairings. The spacetime is globally hyperbolic. The exact Feynman construction in IS (Theorems 1.2 and 1.4) therefore applies. The required operator-sign convention is obtained by multiplying the operator and its inverses by if needed.

    The formula for follows from . Its transpose is also a left and right inverse of . The Feynman relation is transpose-invariant, so averaging the inverse and its transpose preserves the required microlocal class.

  • sectionExact inverses, not positivity by terminologyNormalized Hadamard contraction data › Exact inverses, not positivity by terminology · lines 1285–1291
    Open as its own page

    No claim of physical positivity is drawn from this lemma. Recent analyses of the passage from Feynman inverses to states also emphasize that positivity is an additional condition FS.

  • sectionBosonic and ghost contractionsNormalized Hadamard contraction data › Bosonic and ghost contractions · XX-B@1#eq:WP · lines 1292–1306
    Open as its own page

    Take real-transpose-symmetric , and set

    where star is the Hermitian kernel adjoint.

    Let mean that the first covector is future-directed. In signature , this means its metric-raised vector is future-directed.

  • propositionProposition: Exact contraction normalizationNormalized Hadamard contraction data › Bosonic and ghost contractions · XX-B@1#prop:W, XX-B@1#eq:Wfield, XX-B@1#eq:WCCR, XX-B@1#eq:WWF · proof attached · lines 1307–1335
    Open as its own page

    The bidistributions in (eq:WP) satisfy

    Proof. The difference of two exact inverses is a bisolution. Since and ,

    Hermitian averaging preserves that identity because is real and transpose-antisymmetric. It also preserves the bisolution equations.

    The Feynman orientation fixes the wavefront of to the positive-frequency relation. Hermitian kernel adjunction reverses both frequency and slot order, preserving that relation.

  • sectionBosonic and ghost contractionsNormalized Hadamard contraction data › Bosonic and ghost contractions · XX-B@1#eq:Wfull · lines 1335–1361
    Open as its own page

    The smooth freedom in these choices is declared input freedom. It is not a cosmological state-selection theorem.

    The auxiliary field is realized on the free equations as . Define

    Mixed even–odd contractions are zero. For ghosts use

    This convention makes the displayed odd contractions compatible with the adjoint.

  • theoremTheorem: Normalized complete free contraction matrixNormalized Hadamard contraction data › Bosonic and ghost contractions · XX-B@1#thm:contractions · proof attached · lines 1362–1405
    Open as its own page

    The matrices (eq:Wfull):

    1. are bisolutions of the full even and odd free operators;

    2. have the graded canonical antisymmetric part ;

    3. obey the positive-frequency wavefront upper bound componentwise.

    They therefore define normalized contractions for compactly smeared free fields.

    Proof. For the even matrix, the lower row equation uses , and the upper row reduces to . Right equations follow by adjunction. The odd field equations follow from .

    The antisymmetric part is . The and parts follow from

    The part vanishes because

    For odd variables, graded antisymmetrization is ordinary symmetrization across the two odd slots. The upper cross entry gives

    and the lower cross entry gives , exactly as in (eq:odd-green).

    Differential operators in either slot do not enlarge the wavefront set.

  • sectionWhat is and is not BRST-normalizedNormalized Hadamard contraction data › What is and is not BRST-normalized · XX-B@1#eq:symmetric-defect · lines 1407–1423
    Open as its own page

    The causal Green identities are exact. The symmetric choice of need not be strictly invariant under the undeformed free operation .

    For example, the uncontracted free Ward test for has defect

    Its causal antisymmetric part vanishes by Proposition prop:intertwining.

  • lemmaLemma: The remaining contraction Ward defect is smoothNormalized Hadamard contraction data › What is and is not BRST-normalized · XX-B@1#lem:smooth-defect · proof attached · lines 1424–1451
    Open as its own page

    The kernel (eq:symmetric-defect) is a smooth mixed bisolution. Its vanishing is not asserted.

    Proof. Before Hermitian averaging, the advanced Green contributions cancel exactly, leaving a constant multiple of

    The operator identities imply

    Its wavefront relation is contained in the Feynman relation. A homogeneous two-slot solution cannot have a nonzero Feynman wavefront: propagation in the first slot along the full null bicharacteristic would carry a directed Feynman singularity through coincidence to the forbidden time orientation. Non-null diagonal directions are excluded by elliptic regularity. Thus is smooth. This is also the uniqueness-modulo-smooth part of the distinguished-parametrix construction IS. Adjunction and averaging preserve smoothness.

  • sectionWhat is and is not BRST-normalizedNormalized Hadamard contraction data › What is and is not BRST-normalized · lines 1451–1461
    Open as its own page

    An exact choice killing (eq:symmetric-defect), and positivity on the physical quotient, require additional smooth normalization and state arguments. Neither is silently declared solved.

    This distinction does not invalidate the compact-test gauge-fixed contraction construction. It limits the interpretation of that construction.

  • sectionCompact-test field algebraNormalized Hadamard contraction data › Compact-test field algebra · lines 1462–1482
    Open as its own page

    For compact field tests, impose

    and the full free field equations. The contractions are . Finite Wick polynomials in compactly smeared linear fields are defined by finite pairings with smooth compact joint tests.

    This does not admit an arbitrary singular or noncompact composite kernel. In particular, it does not yet define the native pairing of the full lapse Hessian with .

Complete lapse coefficient and the classical principal-symbol check

  • sectionRaw lapse coefficientsComplete lapse coefficient and the classical principal-symbol check › Raw lapse coefficients · XX-B@1#eq:Wlapse, XX-B@1#eq:Nlapse, XX-B@1#eq:alpha · lines 1488–1533
    Open as its own page

    With

    the complete coefficients are

    For ,

    The forward coordinate map is

    Its inverse has

    Define .

  • theoremTheorem: Retained classical coefficientComplete lapse coefficient and the classical principal-symbol check › Raw lapse coefficients · XX-B@1#thm:lapse, XX-B@1#eq:n1, XX-B@1#eq:n2 · proof attached · lines 1534–1567
    Open as its own page

    The complete original-rod lapse coefficients are

    For the frozen background,

    The constructed does not enter .

    Proof. Taylor composition gives

    The background has no spatial derivative. Substitution of (eq:alpha) gives (eq:n2). The spatial part of , containing , multiplies . The first-order explicit expression follows from (eq:clock-jet) and (eq:Nlapse).

  • sectionRaw lapse coefficientsComplete lapse coefficient and the classical principal-symbol check › Raw lapse coefficients · lines 1567–1573
    Open as its own page

    No metric component or embedding contribution has been discarded. In particular, (eq:gamma2) remains part of the rod construction even though drops out of this specific coefficient.

  • propositionProposition: Classical principal-symbol comparisonComplete lapse coefficient and the classical principal-symbol check › Meaning of the 0 comparison · XX-B@1#prop:classical-limit · proof attached · lines 1576–1597
    Open as its own page

    On the compact-test regular polynomial algebra, reduction modulo returns the classical commuting polynomial. All Wick-ordering corrections are of positive -degree. Consequently, any later admission of the complete frozen lapse with this principal symbol must recover (eq:n1)–(eq:n2), including their rod term and the absence of .

    Proof. Each contraction carries one factor of . A finite polynomial has only finitely many contractions, and setting removes all of them. The resulting commutative symbol is the chosen classical polynomial.

    The lapse coefficients are already fixed by the classical composition calculation. Their absence or replacement cannot be supplied by a positive-order quantum correction.

  • sectionMeaning of the 0 comparisonComplete lapse coefficient and the classical principal-symbol check › Meaning of the 0 comparison · lines 1597–1613
    Open as its own page

    This is not a numerical limit of field operators or a state-dependent expectation theorem. The unsmoothed nonlocal quadratic lapse is not yet an element of the compact-test regular polynomial algebra. Its admission remains a Q3 problem.

    In particular, the existence of does not make

    a defined distributional pairing without the required product, pullback, spatial-tail, and extension arguments.

Negative controls and the same-target map

  • propositionProposition: Pure-trace probes do not authenticate a full kernelNegative controls and the same-target map › Pure-trace observations and Green uniqueness · XX-B@1#prop:trace · proof attached · lines 1620–1642
    Open as its own page

    Pure-trace evaluations alone do not determine an unrestricted compact smooth two-metric-slot kernel. They do not, however, create ambiguity between two retarded inverses of the fully specified operator .

    Proof. Choose a nonzero smooth compact trace-free symmetric tensor in a coordinate patch, and set

    It annihilates all pure-trace metric tests and is nonzero. Thus selected trace probes cannot authenticate a full kernel.

    On the other hand, Theorem thm:greens proves uniqueness from the complete differential equation and retarded support. The trace-blind perturbation is not asserted to preserve those inverse equations and support conditions.

  • sectionPure-trace observations and Green uniquenessNegative controls and the same-target map › Pure-trace observations and Green uniqueness · lines 1642–1647
    Open as its own page

    This retains the non-determination shape of XVIII-A CheungXVIIIA without incorrectly claiming that the fully frozen causal inverse is nonunique.

  • sectionOne-page equation map to XX-ANegative controls and the same-target map › One-page equation map to XX-A · lines 1648–1698
    Open as its own page
    XX-A objectXX-B realizationScope retained
    Action and background(eq:action)–(eq:potential)Same power-law variant;
    Factorial metric–scalar jet(eq:jet)All metric components retained
    Clock calibration and positive lapse(eq:clock), (eq:raw-lapse)Matter-scalar lapse, not silently cosmic-rescaled
    Clock-slice inverse(eq:clock-jet)–(eq:theta)Same local time inversion
    Embedding and induced metric(eq:induced)–(eq:gamma2)Mixed components and scalar-gradient terms retained
    Original rods and decay(eq:rods)–(eq:Y2)Same elliptic inverse; no causal replacement
    Unfixed coupled equations(eq:Gamma1)–(eq:scalar1)Converted to action Hessian by (eq:H)
    Gauge-fixing candidate(eq:F)–(eq:Sgf)Unspecified parameter fixed to
    Missing coupled realization(eq:Bbulk)–(eq:L)Normal hyperbolicity proved
    Missing full inverses(eq:GB), (eq:even-green), (eq:odd-green)Exact compact-test causal matrices
    Missing normalized contractions(eq:WP)–(eq:Wfull)Hadamard algebraic contractions; not physical state selection
    Complete lapse coefficient(eq:Wlapse)–(eq:n2)Rod term included; absence proved
    Quantum observable and identityNot constructed hereQ2–Q5 not promoted from Q1
  • sectionSource map and refused transfersNegative controls and the same-target map › Source map and refused transfers · lines 1699–1737
    Open as its own page
    ComparisonShape usedTransfer refused
    XX-AFrozen variant and Q1 targetNative Em02-E identification without a full data comparison
    Cheung, Em02-EOriginal rods and incomplete quantum auditNative covariance, state, tails, or lapse Ward identity
    Cheung, XIX-DQ1–Q5 distinctionState positivity or nonlocal product admission from a free inverse
    Cheung, XVIII-ATrace-blind and formal-order controlsKernel authentication from selected contractions
    Cheung, XIX-CFinite/continuum and scheduled-support disciplineA continuum field construction from a finite register
    Hack; BFHPRCoupled linear gauge and relational frameworksTheir particular covariance or rods as the present construction
    XVI-Q and catalogue recordsStanding scope boundaryBulk two-point counterterms as lapse counterterms; catalogue as a proof premise

    No finite-mode or lattice approximation is introduced. Therefore no finite-channel refinement theorem is needed or inferred.

Exact release and remaining gates

  • definitionDefinition: Q1 closure used in this paperExact release and remaining gates · XX-B@1#def:closure · lines 1742–1760
    Open as its own page

    Q1 closure means:

    1. a complete gauge-fixed free multiplet and its quadratic action;

    2. a specified coupled operator domain on compact spacetime tests;

    3. normalized retarded and advanced inverse matrices, including auxiliary and ghost sectors;

    4. proved support and wavefront bounds;

    5. a nonempty, explicitly normalized Hadamard contraction class with its remaining smooth freedom declared.

    It does not include physical state positivity, nonlocal lapse-product admission, spatial-tail estimates for that insertion, or an interacting Ward identity.

  • sectionExact release and remaining gatesExact release and remaining gates · lines 1760–1768
    Open as its own page

    If a stronger use of “Q1” includes a selected positive physical state or strict invariance of the symmetric two-point function, that stronger target is not closed by this paper. Equation (eq:symmetric-defect) displays the remaining normalization issue rather than concealing it.

  • theoremTheorem: XX-B Q1 releaseExact release and remaining gates · XX-B@1#thm:release · proof attached · lines 1769–1814
    Open as its own page

    For the frozen XX-A original-rod variant and Definition def:closure:

    1. the complete coupled action Hessian, gauge fermion, auxiliary normalization, and ghost operator are constructed;

    2. the reduced operator is normally hyperbolic after the explicit invertible fiber normalization;

    3. all retarded and advanced Green matrices are constructed with their actual action normalization, support, and wavefront bounds;

    4. normalized Hadamard contractions for the complete free multiplet exist and are supplied by (eq:WP)–(eq:Wfull);

    5. the original elliptic rods and all retained classical lapse contributions remain unchanged;

    6. the classical principal-symbol check preserves the rod term and the proved absence of .

    Thus Q1 is closed for the compact-test gauge-fixed free-input target. No renormalized nonlinear relational lapse, positive physical state, spatial-tail theorem, complete quantum remainder, or interacting Ward identity is released.

    Proof. Lemma lem:H and Section sec:gauge-fixing prove (i). Theorem thm:NH proves (ii). Theorems thm:greens and thm:full-green, Proposition prop:intertwining, and Proposition prop:WF prove (iii). Lemma lem:Feynman, Proposition prop:W, and Theorem thm:contractions prove (iv). Lemma lem:rod-realization and Theorem thm:lapse prove (v). Proposition prop:classical-limit proves (vi).

    None of these results establishes the missing nonlocal distributional operations or physical state conditions. The final sentence therefore retains their explicit gate boundaries.

  • sectionExact release and remaining gatesExact release and remaining gates · lines 1814–1846
    Open as its own page
    GateEnding hereExact qualification
    Q1Constructed, free compact-test scopeFull operator, causal inverses, wavefront bounds, and normalized algebraic Hadamard contractions
    Q2Partial input onlyHadamard contraction class exists; physical positivity, state choice, subsidiary symmetric normalization, and lapse-specific tails remain
    Q3Not closedNonlocal lapse Hessian products, extensions, and counterterm images not constructed
    Q4Not closedFormal orders identified; no complete quantum remainder or regulator-removal estimate
    Q5Not closedFree causal identities proved; complete interacting lapse breaking and admissible repair not evaluated
  • sectionStanding release boundaryExact release and remaining gates › Standing release boundary · lines 1847–1876
    Open as its own page

    The original-rod variant is not identified with the VI harmonic scalar, the VIII incidence parameter, or the X-A density ramp CheungXIXD,CheungEm02E. The independently supplied narrow XVI-Q report is not a clock certificate or a de Sitter state CheungXVIQ.

    The standing boundary is

    \boxed{
     \begin{gathered}
     \text{Declared path: null},\\
     \text{Q1 free-input construction: closed in the stated scope},\\
     \text{quantum relational-lapse milestone: not yet closed},\\
     \text{external-time-free quantum evolution: not constructed},\\
     \text{inherited characteristic quantum coefficient: not admitted},\\
     \texttt{\detokenize{O.1 = NOT_CLOSED}}
           \quad\text{outside the narrow XVI-Q scope},\\
     \text{XVI-N and spatially compact Route B: not discharged},\\
     \text{XV-B downstream quantum-admission exit: not opened},\\
     \text{regulator removal, UV completeness, and compilation:
           not asserted}.
     \end{gathered}}

    No change to a native registered manuscript's release is inferred merely from citing this separately frozen construction.

Declarations

  • sectionDeclarationsDeclarations · lines 1877–1923
    Open as its own page

    -contained prescription. The background, action, field normalizations, gauge condition, spatial rod equations, and classical insertion coefficients used in the proofs are reproduced explicitly.

    theorem use. The normally hyperbolic Green and bundle-valued Feynman theorems are declared mathematical inputs. Their global-hyperbolicity, smoothness, principal-symbol, and self-adjointness hypotheses are checked above. Hack and BFHPR are not used to supply unidentified native objects.

    interpretation. A gauge-fixed Hadamard contraction on an indefinite field bundle is not announced as a positive physical state. The smooth subsidiary contraction defect is displayed. No physical expectation of the unsmoothed lapse is evaluated.

    and attribution scope. Cheung manuscripts are cited by their supplied registered identifiers and versions. The current Companion record attributes its registered manuscripts to Ngo Cheung. XX-A is cited as the supplied anonymous construction in this manuscript exchange, not as an authenticated registered Cheung manuscript. The separate OpenAI catalogue is not a theorem premise.

    . No successful pdfLaTeX run, proof-assistant execution, independent numerical calculation, native programme compilation, referee decision, or journal acceptance is asserted. The mathematical arguments are the printed proofs and the explicitly identified analytic theorem applications.

    metadata. The source is anonymous. A signed submission must supply authorized author and affiliation information and stable copies or archival locations for unpublished records. No authorship is inferred from a citation.

  • bibliographyReferencesDeclarations · lines 1924–2079
    Open as its own page

    XXA

    XX-A: Original-Rod Lapse: Classical Freeze and Quantum Admission Contract, anonymous draft supplied in the present manuscript exchange, -A.tex, n.d. The independently frozen power-law original-rod variant. No registered authorship, compilation, or independent verification is inferred.

    CheungEm02E

    N. Cheung, Em02-E, version 1, supplied registered manuscript record, 02-E-v1.tex, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion. Relevant supplied locators: :lapse, :release, “The quantum input gate and the first contraction target,” and “Checks that prevent false quantum conclusions.” Original inflaton-slice harmonic rods and incomplete quantum audit.

    CheungXVIIIA

    N. Cheung, Landmark XVIII-A: Prepared Relational Observables: Non-Determination, Normalization Compatibility, and Conditional Ultraviolet Matching, version 2, supplied registered manuscript record, -A-v2.tex, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion. Relevant supplied locators: :witness, :smoothwitness, :hbar, :ward, and :release. Pure-trace, formal-order, and actual-counterterm-image controls.

    CheungXIXC

    N. Cheung, XIX-C, version 1, supplied registered manuscript record, -C.tex, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion. Finite incidence registers, scheduled support, and continuum non-determination. Relevant supplied locators: :limit, :two-limits, and “A local checklist, not an authentication of C1–C7.”

    CheungXIXD

    N. Cheung, XIX-D, version 1, supplied registered manuscript record, -D.tex, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion. Relevant supplied locators: :slots, :target, :repair, and “CE: the original-rod relational lapse.” Same-target quantum-certificate discipline.

    CheungXVIQ

    N. Cheung, XVI-Q, release Q11, supplied registered manuscript record, -Q.tex, n.d. Enter Calculus Companion. Relevant supplied locators: :o1, :qds, :insertion, and :package. Narrow bulk two-point closure report and explicit nontransfer qualifications.

    Hack

    T.-P. Hack, “Quantization of the linearised Einstein–Klein–Gordon system on arbitrary backgrounds and the special case of perturbations in inflation,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 31 (2014), 215004. DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/31/21/215004. arXiv:1403.3957. Coupled linearized field and gauge framework; its particular realization is not substituted for this one.

    BFHPR

    R. Brunetti, K. Fredenhagen, T.-P. Hack, N. Pinamonti, and K. Rejzner, “Cosmological perturbation theory and quantum gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics 08 (2016), 032. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2016)032. arXiv:1605.02573. Relational-observable context; no native rod or covariance identification is imported.

    BGP

    C. Bär, N. Ginoux, and F. Pfäffle, Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization, ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, European Mathematical Society, Zürich, 2007. DOI: 10.4171/037. arXiv:0806.1036. Theorem 3.2.11 and Corollary 3.4.3: Cauchy well-posedness and unique causal Green operators for normally hyperbolic bundle operators.

    IS

    O. Islam and A. Strohmaier, “On microlocalisation and the construction of Feynman propagators for normally hyperbolic operators,” Communications in Analysis and Geometry 32 (2024), 1811–1883. DOI: 10.4310/CAG.241204020919. arXiv:2012.09767. Theorems 1.2 and 1.4: bundle-valued distinguished parametrices and exact Hadamard bisolutions. Positivity for an indefinite gauge-fixed pairing is not imported.

    FS

    C. J. Fewster and A. Strohmaier, “On the construction of Hadamard states from Feynman propagators,” arXiv:2510.11492. Primary research account of the additional positivity conditions in passing from Feynman propagators to states. No physical-state result for the present gauge theory is inferred.

    BFR

    R. Brunetti, K. Fredenhagen, and K. Rejzner, “Quantum gravity from the point of view of locally covariant quantum field theory,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 345 (2016), 741–779. DOI: 10.1007/s00220-016-2676-x. arXiv:1306.1058. Perturbative gravity and BV context, not a native lapse admission or ultraviolet-completeness theorem.

    HWlocal

    S. Hollands and R. M. Wald, “Local Wick polynomials and time ordered products of quantum fields in curved spacetime,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 223 (2001), 289–326. DOI: 10.1007/s002200100540. arXiv:gr-qc/0103074. Local Wick-product framework; not automatic admission of an instantaneous nonlocal rod composite.