Manuscript Hawk04-B@2 · Hawk04-B.tex · theorem · ba3b0713
Theorem: Exact recovery and a constant complete complement
Complete preservation, exact correction, and no-hiding · lines 507–586 · proof included or linked
Hawk04-B@2#thm:exact, Hawk04-B@2#eq:normalform, Hawk04-B@2#eq:decoder
For an isometry , the following are equivalent:
one CPTP decoder on exactly recovers the entire code;
for some state ;
;
When these conditions hold, there are a separable Hilbert space , a state , and an isometry such that
An exact decoder, defined on all trace-class operators on , is
Proof. Linearity proves (ii) equivalent to (iii). Expansion of the Bell projector proves (iii) equivalent to (iv).
Assume (ii), and write the nonzero spectral decomposition
The index set is finite or countable. Constancy of the residual implies that every code vector is supported in . Write
The matrix-unit condition gives
Hence
extends to an isometry, and gives (eq:normalform). Both terms of (eq:decoder) are CP; their traces sum to . The decoder recovers every .
Conversely, let be a Stinespring isometry for an exact decoder. The normal Stinespring structure is the standard external dilation theorem KSW,Watrous. Set . For basis input , the decoded marginal is the pure state , so
Exact recovery of requires . All are therefore one common normalized vector. Tracing the decoded register and yields .
Displayed formulas in this passage
Hawk04-B@2#eq:normalform · line 523
Hawk04-B@2#eq:decoder · line 528
unlabeled · line 515
unlabeled · line 542
unlabeled · line 551
unlabeled · line 558
unlabeled · line 563
unlabeled · line 578
Nearby in this section
- theorem: Theorem: Complete unitary preservation
- section: Complete preservation, exact correction, and no-hiding
- section: Complete preservation, exact correction, and no-hiding
- corollary: Corollary: The precise residual-only no-hiding conclusion
- remark: Remark: Nonconstant does not mean residual-only recoverable
- section: Complete preservation, exact correction, and no-hiding