Manuscript IV-B@1 · IV-B-v1.tex · proposition · dfb66408

Proposition: No return, no residual inference, no finite CCR

The finite destructive clock instrument › Three separations · lines 1476–1504 · proof included or linked

IV-B@1#prop:three-separations

Back to manuscript

For :

  1. has no universal left inverse on all clock–system states;

  2. equality of record effects does not imply equality of recorded residual instruments;

  3. finite matrices cannot satisfy .

Proof. The two clock states , tensored with the same residual, have the same image under . A left inverse would have to recover both distinct inputs from that image.

For the second assertion, on a residual qubit compare

Both instruments have effects , but on their conditional residuals are and . Thus their records agree on every input and their residuals need not.

Finally, , whereas .

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 1495

Nearby in this section