Manuscript IX-A-ST@1 · IX-A-ST.tex · proposition · 6e99d1b2
Proposition: Sharp coarse Lüders compatibility
Residual compatibility, blindness, and recovery safeguards · lines 1682–1710 · proof included or linked
IX-A-ST@1#prop:luders
If and for projections , then
Agreement with the aggregated fine residual instrument further requires, and is equivalent to,
for the declared residual observables.
Proof. Write with an isometry obtained from a Kraus family. Expansion shows
Thus , giving the first identity. Insert it into Proposition prop:compatibility; multiplication by distinct proves the remaining equivalence.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 1686
unlabeled · line 1691
unlabeled · line 1702
Nearby in this section
- section: Residual compatibility, blindness, and recovery safeguards
- proposition: Proposition: Record and residual criteria
- proposition: Proposition: Equal records leave a residual gap
- section: Residual compatibility, blindness, and recovery safeguards
- proposition: Proposition: Informative-record recovery obstruction
- section: Residual compatibility, blindness, and recovery safeguards