Manuscript VII-C@1 · VII-C.tex · lemma · 8b2ade29

Lemma: Uniform high-frequency asymptotics

The mandatory mixed triple › The reflected light-ray transform · lines 1136–1231 · proof included or linked

VII-C@1#lem:asymptotic, VII-C@1#eq:Fasymptotic, VII-C@1#eq:Ebound

Back to manuscript

Let be compact. Uniformly for , , , and ,

where

For , is uniformly bounded on , independently of .

Proof. Separate (eq:K) into its direct and reflected terms.

term. After integration against , the direct term contains the Fourier transform of , or of , at temporal frequency and spatial frequency . Since is smooth and compact,

and the same holds with . Integrating against proves arbitrary rapid decrease in , uniformly in and in .

term. Write

On ,

The constants in the last estimate may depend on the fixed mass. The phase is

uniformly for in the support of and .

The spatial Fourier transform of decreases rapidly in , uniformly in , with all required derivatives. The errors above therefore contribute after extracting .

The leading -integral is Fourier inversion:

Its -integral is .

On , arbitrary rapid decrease in dominates the locally integrable factor . After extracting , that tail is for any prescribed , by taking sufficiently many Fourier-decay powers. The direct term can be absorbed into the same error. This proves (eq:Fasymptotic)–(eq:Ebound).

For bounded , integrate the spatial Fourier-decay bounds against . Both are locally integrable, and the large- tails are rapidly decreasing. This proves the last assertion.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • VII-C@1#eq:Fasymptotic · line 1141

  • VII-C@1#eq:Ebound · line 1153

  • unlabeled · line 1184

  • unlabeled · line 1193

  • unlabeled · line 1170

  • unlabeled · line 1180

  • unlabeled · line 1210

Nearby in this section