Manuscript VII-C@1 · VII-C.tex · 8b2ade29
Landmark VII-C A mixed-Wick obstruction to a normal-topology boundary extension for sharp Cauchy harmonic insertions
Rules out one normal-topology Wick extension: the fully contracted coefficient of a named mixed triple diverges logarithmically under stated continuity and old-product agreement. Not a universal obstruction to every boundary algebra. No retarded product is constructed. No compilation is asserted.
Front matter
abstractAbstractFront matter · lines 66–89
Open as its own pageWe retain the sharp zero-Cauchy harmonic dressing and its exact off-shell classical functional, and examine a boundary enlargement of the free polynomial Wick domain. The outcome is a specified continuity obstruction, not an algebra construction. For the fixed Minkowski de Donder two-point matrix, the full tensor calculation gives , while contains a Cauchy-reflected frequency branch. Linear products, the insertion self-product, and a mixed quadratic test admit compact distributional polynomial representatives. Nevertheless, the mandatory ordered word , with , has a fully contracted coefficient whose regular-kernel approximations grow logarithmically. We compute the nonzero coefficient explicitly as a product of reflected light-ray transforms. The approximating insertion kernels converge in a specified normal topology, so this divergence rules out a sequentially continuous extension of that coefficient. Consequently, it rules out a hypocontinuous Wick algebra extension satisfying the stated admission and coefficient-continuity requirements. The logarithmic coefficient can be nonzero for three pairwise disjoint observation supports. No free equation is imposed on configurations, no additional coordinate field is introduced, and no retarded product is constructed.
- figureVII-C changes the insertion domain onlyFront matter · VII-C@1#fig:scope-VII-C · lines 91–104Inherited sharp dressing→New insertion domain→A new field equationChanging the domain does not replace the field equation.
VII-C changes the insertion domain only. The three boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.
- figureVII-C changes the insertion domain onlyFront matter · VII-C@1#fig:split-VII-C · lines 106–117Inherited sharp dressingA new field equationChanging the domain does not replace the field equation.
VII-C changes the insertion domain only. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.
- figureReading downward is not a transferFront matter · VII-C@1#fig:chain-VII-C · lines 119–132Inherited sharp dressing↓New insertion domain↓A new field equationChanging the domain does not replace the field equation.
Reading downward is not a transfer. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.
- figureInherited sharp dressing is not A new field equationFront matter · VII-C@1#fig:pair-VII-C · lines 134–147Inherited sharp dressingnot the same objectA new field equationNew insertion domain. Changing the domain does not replace the field equation.
Inherited sharp dressing is not A new field equation. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.
- figureThree statuses stay separateFront matter · VII-C@1#fig:gate-VII-C · lines 149–162Named: Inherited sharp dressing→Used here: New insertion domain→Not claimed: A new field equationChanging the domain does not replace the field equation.
Three statuses stay separate. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.
sectionFront matterFront matter · lines 162–171
Open as its own pageFigure fig:split-VII-C records one view of the same separation. Figure fig:chain-VII-C records one view of the same separation. Figure fig:pair-VII-C records one view of the same separation. Figure fig:gate-VII-C records one view of the same separation. The drawings add no hypothesis.
Figure fig:scope-VII-C records that separation. The drawing adds no hypothesis.
Problem, fixed model, and precise scope
sectionProblem, fixed model, and precise scopeProblem, fixed model, and precise scope · VII-C@1#eq:B · lines 172–201
Open as its own pageThe sharp dressing considered here is
The minus sign agrees with the first geometric coefficient . All classical configurations are smooth and unrestricted by their equations of motion.
The preceding obstruction is not interpreted as closing the interacting product problem. Here we ask a narrower question: does admitting the actual compact distributional kernel of (eq:B), with a specified normal topology, permit a continuous extension of the fixed free Wick product?
The answer proved below is negative for a named mandatory graph. The continuity assumptions are part of the theorem. An abstract algebra with a different topology, a smaller collection of bulk observables, or additional renormalized boundary operations is not excluded.
sectionConventionsProblem, fixed model, and precise scope › Conventions · VII-C@1#eq:C · lines 202–240
Open as its own pageLet
Indices are raised with , and
The zero-Cauchy inverse satisfies
We take . Thus its support has a positive distance in the time coordinate from .
dictionary. Relative to the convention ,
All raised-index expressions are recomputed using . If one also changes so that the full metric changes sign, then and .
sectionThe fixed free matrixProblem, fixed model, and precise scope › The fixed free matrix · VII-C@1#eq:Hhh, VII-C@1#eq:P, VII-C@1#eq:Hscalar, VII-C@1#eq:positive, VII-C@1#eq:star · lines 241–287
Open as its own pageThe active even blocks are
where is fixed and
No positivity is assumed for the graviton block.
The remaining gauge-fixed multiplet components are spectators in every calculation below. An enlargement of the full multiplet algebra must, in particular, admit the displayed even-sector products. Therefore an obstruction in this sector is sufficient for the stated conclusion. No inference about physical observables in gauge cohomology is made; that is a separate problem in the perturbative gravitational framework BFR.
We use the Wick-symbol convention
For finite polynomials this sum is finite. A local expression such as denotes its Wick symbol; no self-contraction is included inside that expression.
sectionThe old polynomial domainProblem, fixed model, and precise scope › The old polynomial domain · lines 288–314
Open as its own pageLet denote finite polynomial functionals with compact distributional kernels satisfying the usual microcausal exclusion: for a kernel of degree ,
with the total zero covector omitted. Let denote the finite polynomials with smooth compact kernels.
Only finite polynomials are used. Results about unrestricted smooth microcausal functionals are not presumed. In particular, the distinction between polynomial and general functional domains identified by Hawkins, Rejzner, and Visser is respected HRV. Their generalized-cone framework motivates a cone test, but supplies no premise asserting that passes it.
sectionWhat will be provedProblem, fixed model, and precise scope › What will be proved · lines 315–320
Open as its own pageThe principal result is the following statement, whose topology and coefficient are defined precisely in Sections sec:topology and sec:triple.
theoremTheorem: Main result: a specified C-obstructionProblem, fixed model, and precise scope › What will be proved · VII-C@1#thm:main, VII-C@1#eq:mainasymptotic · lines 321–347
Open as its own pageFor the fixed matrix (eq:Hhh)–(eq:Hscalar), there exist real nonnegative , with pairwise disjoint supports, and regular polynomials such that:
their mixed kernels converge to the exact kernels of in the normal-topology stages specified in Section sec:topology;
with ,
where ;
the corresponding fully contracted coefficient has no sequentially continuous extension at the pair of sharp kernels that agrees with the old Wick product on regular kernels.
In particular, no algebra extension satisfying Assumption ass:extension exists.
sectionWhat will be provedProblem, fixed model, and precise scope › What will be proved · lines 347–353
Open as its own pageThe evaluation sets all classical fields to zero and hence extracts the field-independent coefficient. It is not a replacement of the algebra-valued target by a matrix element: it is a necessary continuous coefficient map of the proposed algebra extension.
Exact off-shell reconstruction and causal support
sectionExact off-shell reconstruction and causal supportExact off-shell reconstruction and causal support · lines 354–363
Open as its own pageWrite
All formulas act componentwise on .
propositionProposition: Off-shell reconstructionExact off-shell reconstruction and causal support · VII-C@1#prop:reconstruction, VII-C@1#eq:reconstruction, VII-C@1#eq:wsplit · proof attached · lines 364–415
Open as its own pageFor every smooth , on ,
Consequently,
is an exact off-shell identity.
For , set
Then is compact, and depends on only in and on only in .
Proof. Let . In spatial Fourier notation,
and
The quotients at zero spatial frequency are interpreted by their smooth limits.
The difference between the two sides of (eq:reconstruction) solves the homogeneous wave equation with zero Cauchy data, and therefore vanishes. Applying gives (eq:wsplit), and substituting into (eq:B) gives the claimed split.
Finite propagation speed implies that , for , depends only on the restriction of to the causal segment between and . The same holds for its derivatives. The union of these segments is contained in . Compactness follows directly from compactness of and the Minkowski causal bound.
remarkRemark: The source is retainedExact off-shell reconstruction and causal support · lines 417–430
Open as its own pageThe triple is a presentation of the same off-shell field, not a new collection of propagating fields. In particular, is not set to zero.
For linear source smearings, the bisolution identities imply
Thus such source variables are central for the free Wick product. This does not make them zero classical functionals, and it does not by itself define products involving arbitrary singular source-sector kernels.
The full insertion kernel and the characteristic-cone test
sectionA joint wavefront upper boundThe full insertion kernel and the characteristic-cone test › A joint wavefront upper bound · VII-C@1#eq:Lret, VII-C@1#eq:GammaB · lines 434–471
Open as its own pageWe order the mixed kernel variables as , with the scalar slot and the graviton slot. There is a compact tensor-valued distribution such that
The compact-kernel assertion follows either from the explicit construction below or from continuity of the bilinear functional (eq:B) and Proposition prop:reconstruction.
Let denote the retarded fundamental solution of . For ,
The identity is local in , so harmless compact cutoffs can be inserted in the integration variables.
For covectors in the fixed Cartesian coordinates, define
The case is included in .
lemmaLemma: Joint-kernel controlThe full insertion kernel and the characteristic-cone test › A joint wavefront upper bound · VII-C@1#lem:WFbound · proof attached · lines 472–514
Open as its own pageThe kernel satisfies
More precisely, its possible singular branches arise from:
the bulk diagonal ;
direct null propagation from to ;
together with null propagation, with covectors
pure boundary conormals
This is an upper bound, not an assertion that every listed covector occurs.
Proof. The retarded wave kernel has diagonal conormals and, away from the diagonal, the null propagation relation . Multiplication by is permitted: a wavefront covector of that factor has zero -component, whereas a wavefront covector of the retarded kernel has nonzero -component. Hence opposite covectors cannot sum to zero.
The product theorem yields the direct branches, the boundary sums , and the pure boundary conormals. At , the bulk diagonal does not meet the support of , because is supported strictly in .
Integrating the first-order operator by parts in gives the kernel of . This can produce a , but not a . Finally, moving from onto the -kernel and multiplying by do not enlarge the wavefront set. This proves the assertion.
sectionA joint wavefront upper boundThe full insertion kernel and the characteristic-cone test › A joint wavefront upper bound · lines 514–521
Open as its own pageThe distinctions between multiplication, pullback, and pushforward used here are the standard distributional ones; membership in a wavefront-restricted vector space is not itself an operation theorem BDH.
sectionThe characteristic-cone enlargement does not admit the insertionThe full insertion kernel and the characteristic-cone test › The characteristic-cone enlargement does not admit the insertion · lines 522–535
Open as its own pageLet be the two null cones in the cotangent bundle and put . The proposed characteristic-cone condition is
propositionProposition: Failure of the characteristic-cone testThe full insertion kernel and the characteristic-cone test › The characteristic-cone enlargement does not admit the insertion · VII-C@1#prop:char, VII-C@1#eq:plane-w · proof attached · lines 536–604
Open as its own pageFor every nonzero ,
In particular, its full mixed kernel cannot be admitted merely by replacing the causal exclusion cones by the null exclusion cones.
Proof. Fix , let , and consider the smooth complexified configuration
A direct use of (eq:C) gives
Solving the zero-Cauchy equation yields
Choose with , and set
Substitution into (eq:B) gives
Indeed, the nonoscillating term is obtained from
all terms containing decrease rapidly after the -integration, including the term with the prefactor . The term containing is .
This is a Fourier test of the compact kernel , contracted with the constant tensor , along a ray for which both slot covectors are null and have the same temporal orientation. If the characteristic-cone condition held, compactness and the definition of the wavefront set would imply rapid decrease along that ray. The nonzero limit contradicts it.
If desired, the plane wave in the graviton slot can be multiplied by a compact cutoff equal to one on a neighborhood of , without changing the calculation.
Cauchy covariances and the full tensor audit
sectionCauchy pullbacksCauchy covariances and the full tensor audit › Cauchy pullbacks · VII-C@1#eq:Cauchymatrix · lines 608–639
Open as its own pageDefine
These pullbacks exist because the conormals of the spacelike Cauchy surface are timelike, whereas the nonzero Hadamard covectors are null. The same argument permits the bulk–boundary blocks. This is an application of the pullback criterion, not a multiplication of boundary delta distributions BDH.
For the scalar massless factor, spatial Fourier transformation gives
multiplied by in the graviton sector. The entries are locally integrable at in three spatial dimensions. The full matrix, including the off-diagonal phases, is retained.
propositionProposition: Tensor cancellationCauchy covariances and the full tensor audit › The vanishing ww contraction · VII-C@1#prop:tensor, VII-C@1#eq:CH, VII-C@1#eq:CHC · proof attached · lines 642–683
Open as its own pageFor the matrix (eq:Hhh),
The induced free Cauchy contractions satisfy
Proof. In four dimensions,
The trace contribution in cancels the trace term in the first divergence of , leaving (eq:CH). Applying , using on , cancels the two mixed second-derivative terms and gives (eq:CHC).
To justify the Cauchy operations without multiplying singular unsmeared kernels, use (eq:positive). On each massless momentum mode, the twice-contracted tensor numerator in (eq:CHC) vanishes before either zero-Cauchy solution operator is applied. The remaining mode factors have polynomial growth and locally integrable infrared behavior. Thus the smeared contraction is zero. Equivalently, the Cauchy covariance construction based on (eq:Cauchymatrix) gives the zero distribution.
remarkRemark: Three limitationsCauchy covariances and the full tensor audit › The vanishing ww contraction · lines 685–690
Open as its own pageThe preceding result does not say that is the zero off-shell functional. It does not say that . It depends on the fixed matrix (eq:Hhh); no claim is made for an arbitrary gauge choice or an arbitrary smooth change of covariance.
sectionThe mixed covariance and its reflected branchCauchy covariances and the full tensor audit › The mixed covariance and its reflected branch · VII-C@1#eq:K · lines 692–736
Open as its own pageThe component needed for the obstruction is
By (eq:CH),
For ,
Consequently,
The terms and are locally integrable at . At large momentum this is an oscillatory distribution with symbol amplitudes.
The last term in (eq:K) is the Cauchy-reflected branch. Its first time frequency is opposite to that of the direct Hadamard branch, while its second time frequency is unchanged. This is the branch responsible for the obstruction.
Reality of and Hermiticity of the fixed covariance imply
The finite tests that do pass
sectionThe finite tests that do passThe finite tests that do pass · lines 738–742
Open as its own pageThe results in this section are existence statements for specified compact polynomial kernels. They are not a closure theorem.
sectionLinear generators and insertion–linear productsThe finite tests that do pass › Linear generators and insertion–linear products · lines 743–775
Open as its own pageIndependently smeared Cauchy fields are admitted using (eq:Cauchymatrix). Their pairings with ordinary spacetime smearings are well defined. This does not define coincident products of boundary fields.
For a compact smooth graviton test tensor , write
Since is smooth,
Likewise, for ,
The reverse products use the transposed covariance. All displayed coefficients are compact distributional polynomial functionals with the causal support inherited from Proposition prop:reconstruction.
propositionProposition: A well-defined self-product kernelThe finite tests that do pass › The insertion self-product · VII-C@1#prop:self, VII-C@1#eq:self · proof attached · lines 778–813
Open as its own pageFor , the following compact distributional polynomial is well defined:
It is the Wick contraction formula for the proposed . The potential coefficient vanishes.
Proof. For fixed smooth , the factor multiplying the differentiated Hadamard distribution in (eq:self) is a smooth compact test function. Hence the pairing exists.
The map from to , restricted to any fixed compact observation region, is continuous in the smooth topology and depends only on a fixed compact causal region. Polarization of (eq:self) therefore gives a continuous bilinear form on the corresponding smooth graviton configurations. The Schwartz kernel theorem gives a compact distributional quadratic kernel.
There are no – contractions. Every term involving a – contraction vanishes by Proposition prop:tensor. This leaves exactly (eq:self).
remarkRemarkThe finite tests that do pass › The insertion self-product · lines 815–819
Open as its own pageThe conclusion is stronger than a merely formal inventory of self-contractions, but weaker than an algebra theorem. The mixed triple below shows why the distinction is necessary.
sectionThe mixed quadratic testThe finite tests that do pass › The mixed quadratic test · lines 821–829
propositionProposition: The mixed quadratic testThe finite tests that do pass › The mixed quadratic test · VII-C@1#prop:quadratic · proof attached · lines 830–868
Open as its own pageThe finite contraction formulas for and define compact distributional polynomial kernels. In particular, the double contraction
is a well-defined distribution.
Proof. Each component of has a direct and a reflected Fourier representation of the form illustrated in (eq:K), with polynomial tensor numerators. In either branch, every nonzero wavefront covector in the -slot has the same temporal orientation as the second slot of ; it is nonzero and null. This follows directly from the phase . The direct branch has the usual null relation and the reflected branch has the relation obtained by reflecting the first time coordinate.
The two factors in the displayed product therefore cannot have opposite total covectors: their -components already have the same orientation in a pointed cone. The multiplication criterion applies.
A single -contraction leaves a distribution multiplied by the smooth classical scalar factors. A single scalar contraction leaves a differentiated Hadamard distribution multiplied by the smooth factors . As in Proposition prop:self, continuity in the smooth configurations and the kernel theorem give the remaining compact polynomial kernels. The reverse product has the reversed, but again common, orientation.
sectionThe mixed quadratic testThe finite tests that do pass › The mixed quadratic test · lines 868–879
Open as its own pageThe product with
also exists at the level of : at most one graviton leg of can contract with , and the resulting mixed covariance is a distribution paired with smooth remaining configuration factors. What fails is the mandatory subsequent multiplication by a second insertion in the topology specified next.
The named topology and regular approximations
sectionNormal-topology stagesThe named topology and regular approximations › Normal-topology stages · lines 883–919
Open as its own pageFor a compact , write
componentwise in the finite-dimensional tensor indices. It carries the normal topology.
Explicitly, this topology is generated by strong distribution seminorms
where is a bounded set of test functions, and by
where is a closed cone and
The normal topology and the distinction between continuity and hypocontinuity are important here DB,BDH.
The translation-invariant angular cone in (eq:GammaB) is deliberately an upper-bound cone. The theorem does not presume that it is the smallest possible cone.
sectionA compact regularization of the kernelsThe named topology and regular approximations › A compact regularization of the kernels · VII-C@1#eq:Beps · lines 920–946
Open as its own pageChoose a real, nonnegative, even, Euclidean-radial with , and put
Define
Its mixed kernel is
In particular, .
These are approximation devices for the exact sharp kernel. They are not proposed as replacement observables.
lemmaLemma: Normal convergenceThe named topology and regular approximations › A compact regularization of the kernels · VII-C@1#lem:normalconv · proof attached · lines 947–1009
Open as its own pageFor every fixed , choose a compact containing a neighborhood of . Then, for all sufficiently small ,
with its normal topology.
Proof. Smoothness and the fixed compact support follow from convolution with a compact approximate identity.
Strong distribution convergence follows from the finite order of and the convergence
in all smooth seminorms, uniformly for in a bounded set of test functions.
For completeness, the microlocal estimates can be checked directly because has a translation-invariant angular cone. Compactness and imply rapid decrease of in every closed cone separated from . Moreover,
The multipliers are uniformly bounded and tend to one on compact frequency sets.
On a closed cone separated from , split frequency space into a fixed ball and its complement. On the ball, the multiplier converges uniformly to one. On the complement, arbitrarily high rapid-decay bounds for give a uniformly small tail. Thus the weighted Fourier seminorms converge to zero.
For a localized seminorm, use
A slightly larger cone still disjoint from controls the nearby-frequency part. On the complementary part, the angular separation forces the argument of to be large; its arbitrary rapid decrease dominates the uniform polynomial growth of . This proves convergence of every normal-topology seminorm.
remarkRemark: Support and the role of the regulatorThe named topology and regular approximations › A compact regularization of the kernels · lines 1011–1019
Open as its own pageThe approximants have support in arbitrarily small neighborhoods of the exact compact support; the limit retains the exact causal support of Proposition prop:reconstruction. The theorem uses an ordinary fixed-support distribution stage containing those neighborhoods. It does not impose an equation of motion and does not replace by a new smooth-edge observable.
The mandatory mixed triple
sectionThe exact regularized coefficientThe mandatory mixed triple › The exact regularized coefficient · VII-C@1#eq:Gdef, VII-C@1#eq:M, VII-C@1#eq:F · lines 1024–1081
Open as its own pageLet be real compact smooth functions, with supported in , and set
Define
This coefficient is unambiguously defined in the old polynomial domain.
There is exactly one fully contracted graph type: the scalar legs of the two insertions are joined, and the two graviton legs are joined to the two legs of . The two assignments of the legs give a factor of . No contraction is present in this graph.
Let
Euclidean radiality makes this independent of . It is real, smooth, rapidly decreasing, and . For the scalar field define
Here and below .
Let be the right-hand side of (eq:K) with the additional multiplier in the momentum integral. This is exactly the covariance between and .
For , put
lemmaLemma: Spectral form of the tripleThe mandatory mixed triple › The exact regularized coefficient · VII-C@1#lem:spectral, VII-C@1#eq:spectral · proof attached · lines 1082–1121
Open as its own pageFor every ,
For and , this expression is nonnegative.
Proof. By (eq:CH), a contraction with forces the insertion vector index to be . Thus the scalar contraction is
The factor from the two -leg assignments cancels the factor in this spectral density. The two minus signs in the definitions of the insertions cancel as well. Hermiticity gives the complex conjugate factor in (eq:spectral).
For fixed , the mollifier multipliers and the compact smooth smearings make the resulting integrals convergent. The positivity assertion uses only the positive scalar spectral measure, not positivity of the graviton covariance.
sectionThe reflected light-ray transformThe mandatory mixed triple › The reflected light-ray transform · VII-C@1#eq:ray · lines 1123–1135
Open as its own pageFor and , define
Only a compact interval contributes. Geometrically, this samples a future observation ray issuing from the spatial point on .
lemmaLemma: Uniform high-frequency asymptoticsThe mandatory mixed triple › The reflected light-ray transform · VII-C@1#lem:asymptotic, VII-C@1#eq:Fasymptotic, VII-C@1#eq:Ebound · proof attached · lines 1136–1231
Open as its own pageLet be compact. Uniformly for , , , and ,
where
For , is uniformly bounded on , independently of .
Proof. Separate (eq:K) into its direct and reflected terms.
term. After integration against , the direct term contains the Fourier transform of , or of , at temporal frequency and spatial frequency . Since is smooth and compact,
and the same holds with . Integrating against proves arbitrary rapid decrease in , uniformly in and in .
term. Write
On ,
The constants in the last estimate may depend on the fixed mass. The phase is
uniformly for in the support of and .
The spatial Fourier transform of decreases rapidly in , uniformly in , with all required derivatives. The errors above therefore contribute after extracting .
The leading -integral is Fourier inversion:
Its -integral is .
On , arbitrary rapid decrease in dominates the locally integrable factor . After extracting , that tail is for any prescribed , by taking sufficiently many Fourier-decay powers. The direct term can be absorbed into the same error. This proves (eq:Fasymptotic)–(eq:Ebound).
For bounded , integrate the spatial Fourier-decay bounds against . Both are locally integrable, and the large- tails are rapidly decreasing. This proves the last assertion.
theoremTheorem: Explicit mixed-graph divergenceThe mandatory mixed triple › The logarithmic coefficient · VII-C@1#thm:log, VII-C@1#eq:log, VII-C@1#eq:residue · proof attached · lines 1235–1338
Open as its own pageFor real as above,
where
The bound is for the fixed three test functions and fixed mass. The coefficient of the logarithm is independent of the chosen normalized radial mollifier.
Proof. Insert Lemma lem:asymptotic into (eq:spectral) and use polar coordinates . For ,
The leading contribution is therefore
We first check that the remainder is uniformly bounded. By (eq:Ebound), the error in the product of the two square brackets in (eq:Fasymptotic) is bounded by a constant times
Also, for every ,
Thus the error integral is controlled by
This is uniformly bounded: terms containing are integrable without the cutoff, and
The correction from is integrable as well. The region is uniformly bounded by the final assertion of Lemma lem:asymptotic.
It remains to evaluate . For ,
so boundedness of gives
Consequently,
Changing variables ,
because , near zero, and decreases rapidly at infinity. This proves (eq:log) with the coefficient (eq:residue).
lemmaLemma: Separated-support witnessThe mandatory mixed triple › Nonzero coefficient away from all observation coincidences · VII-C@1#lem:separated · proof attached · lines 1342–1370
Open as its own pageThere exist nonnegative with pairwise disjoint supports and
Their supports may also be chosen disjoint from .
Proof. Choose pairwise distinct and . Consider
These three spacetime points are distinct. Choose nonnegative smooth bumps , respectively positive near these points, with sufficiently small pairwise disjoint supports contained in .
For near and near , the rays in (eq:ray) meet the regions where and are positive. Hence both ray transforms are positive on an open set on which is positive. Formula (eq:residue) then gives the result.
sectionNonzero coefficient away from all observation coincidencesThe mandatory mixed triple › Nonzero coefficient away from all observation coincidences · VII-C@1#eq:reflectionrelation · lines 1370–1387
Open as its own pageThe coefficient is supported on the reflected collinearity relation
The witness in Lemma lem:separated lies on its noncoincident part.
The continuity obstruction
sectionThe coefficient-level statementThe continuity obstruction › The coefficient-level statement · lines 1391–1401
Open as its own pageFor regular mixed kernels , let denote the associated degree- polynomials, and define
This is a bilinear map on regular kernels.
theoremTheorem: No normal-topology extension of the mandatory coefficientThe continuity obstruction › The coefficient-level statement · VII-C@1#thm:coefficient · proof attached · lines 1402–1439
Open as its own pageChoose as in Lemma lem:separated, and let be a compact set containing neighborhoods of both mixed-kernel supports. The map has no extension to a domain containing
which:
agrees with on the regular kernels;
is sequentially continuous at for the product of the subspace normal topologies inherited from .
Proof. By Lemma lem:normalconv,
in the stated product topology. Sequential continuity would force to converge to a finite complex number.
Agreement on regular kernels and Theorem thm:log instead give
This is a contradiction.
remarkRemark: Why this is more than a divergent regulatorThe continuity obstruction › The coefficient-level statement · lines 1441–1447
Open as its own pageThree independently established facts enter the contradiction: the approximants belong to the old domain; they converge to the sharp kernels in the named topology; and the proposed extension is required to agree with the old products and be continuous. The divergence alone would not constitute an obstruction.
assumptionAssumption: Normal-topology Wick extensionThe continuity obstruction › Consequence for algebra extensions · VII-C@1#ass:extension · lines 1451–1482
Open as its own pageA proposed extension consists of a Hausdorff locally convex -algebra , with the following properties.
embeds into , and its product is the fixed Wick product (eq:star).
The algebra admits the sharp insertions , with
as functionals on all smooth configurations.
On the degree- kernel stages used above, admission is sequentially continuous for the normal topology and agrees with the old inclusion on regular kernels. In particular,
Multiplication is hypocontinuous with respect to bounded sets. The field-independent coefficient map
is continuous and agrees with the usual coefficient extraction on the old polynomial domain.
corollaryCorollary: No algebra extension under the stated requirementsThe continuity obstruction › Consequence for algebra extensions · VII-C@1#cor:noalgebra · proof attached · lines 1484–1515
Open as its own pageThere is no extension satisfying Assumption ass:extension.
Proof. Let
By assumption and , so both convergent families are bounded.
Hypocontinuity implies separate continuity, hence . It also gives joint sequential continuity along convergent sequences: subtract the limit product, split the difference into two terms, and use continuity uniformly over the bounded family in the other factor. Therefore
Applying the continuous coefficient map gives convergence of , contradicting Theorem thm:log and Lemma lem:separated.
sectionConsequence for algebra extensionsThe continuity obstruction › Consequence for algebra extensions · lines 1515–1522
Open as its own pageTheorem thm:main follows from Lemma lem:normalconv, Theorem thm:log, Lemma lem:separated, and Theorem thm:coefficient.
sectionCounterterms and the scope of the conclusionThe continuity obstruction › Counterterms and the scope of the conclusion · lines 1523–1559
Open as its own pageThe extension rule considered here is:
Keep the fixed Wick product on the old domain, admit sharp kernels continuously in the specified normal topology, and introduce no new counterterms on noncoincident characteristic relations.
The separated-support witness shows that a counterterm supported only on the ordinary observation diagonals
or on observation boundary faces cannot subtract the coefficient (eq:residue). The divergence persists when the three observation supports avoid all those sets.
There is an additional distinction worth making explicit. A distribution local in auxiliary Cauchy variables can acquire nonlocal support after Cauchy propagation. Such a modification is not automatically an ordinary observation-diagonal counterterm. Its pushforward, topology, and compatibility with the old Wick product would have to be specified separately.
More fundamentally, any subtraction performed on the regular approximants in (eq:Gdef) changes products that are already fixed in . Assigning a subtracted value only at the sharp kernel does not restore the continuity contradicted by Theorem thm:coefficient.
Thus the theorem excludes the stated normal-topology extension. It does not exclude a different boundary theory with additional renormalized operations, a stronger topology in which the approximants do not converge, or a smaller bulk algebra that omits .
Outcome and the remaining interacting problem
sectionAudit of the finite testsOutcome and the remaining interacting problem › Audit of the finite tests · lines 1562–1597
Open as its own pageTest Object Result in this manuscript A Smoothly smeared Cauchy and bulk linear fields Cauchy covariance construction exists. B against bulk linear fields Compact polynomial representatives exist. C The kernel (eq:self) exists; the terms vanish. D and reverse order The finite contraction kernels exist. E No extension of the fully contracted coefficient with the stated normal-topology continuity and old-product agreement. Neither the vanishing of nor success of Tests A–D is a closure theorem. Test E supplies the named obstruction.
The characteristic-cone alternative also fails for the actual insertion kernel by Proposition prop:char. Merely allowing timelike linear boundary conormals misses the same-orientation null pairs in the bilinear kernel.
sectionOff-shell normalization and presentation independenceOutcome and the remaining interacting problem › Off-shell normalization and presentation independence · lines 1598–1615
Open as its own pageThroughout the argument:
is exactly the functional (eq:B);
is retained in (eq:wsplit);
no free-equation quotient is taken;
no independent coordinate field is introduced;
all regularized coefficients are computed in the original Wick-symbol presentation.
The bulk representation (eq:Lret), the Cauchy-data/source representation (eq:wsplit), and the Fourier expression (eq:K) describe the same fixed operator. The obstruction is therefore not obtained by assigning different products to two presentations of the same classical kernel.
sectionSeparation from time-ordered and retarded productsOutcome and the remaining interacting problem › Separation from time-ordered and retarded products · lines 1616–1643
Open as its own pageThe source-sector observation in Section 2 uses the bisolution identity
A Feynman Green function instead satisfies
with a convention-dependent nonzero constant . Consequently, source variables with zero free Wick contractions can produce contact terms in time-ordered constructions. The free Wick and renormalized time-ordered constructions are distinct FR.
No statement here constructs any of
No interaction vertex is needed for the obstruction, and none is introduced as an unused premise.
sectionClosed statementOutcome and the remaining interacting problem › Closed statement · lines 1644–1668
Open as its own pageThe result of this manuscript is the following restricted but complete conclusion:
This is a C-obstruction for a named boundary-extension scheme. It is not a proof that every possible enlargement fails, not a bimodule construction, and not a closure of the interacting product problem.
A compact derivation of the boundary-frequency reversal
sectionA compact derivation of the boundary-frequency reversalA compact derivation of the boundary-frequency reversal · lines 1669–1701
Open as its own pageThe mechanism can be isolated at one massless momentum. For , the scalar zero-Cauchy inverse is
The second term enforces the initial conditions. It introduces an component although the source has only frequency.
For the component selected by , the derivative in (eq:CH) multiplies the source by , and the Hadamard spectral measure contributes . The reflected mixed covariance therefore has amplitude
In the mixed triple, two such amplitudes contribute . The differentiated scalar covariance contributes , and the remaining radial measure contributes . Thus the leading radial behavior is
This power count alone is not the proof of divergence: the tensor selection, exact graph identity, nonzero light-ray coefficient, uniform remainder estimate, and topology argument are supplied in Sections 4–7.