Manuscript VII-D@1 · VII-D.tex · proposition · ef67c89c

Proposition: Regulator-independent ultraviolet decomposition

Replacement and the complete ultraviolet split › The ultraviolet decomposition · lines 1561–1631 · proof included or linked

VII-D@1#prop:UV, VII-D@1#eq:UV, VII-D@1#eq:Eerror, VII-D@1#eq:errorfirst, VII-D@1#eq:errorsecond, VII-D@1#eq:scalarreplacement

Back to manuscript

The exact family has the decomposition

where are independent of , and

Proof. The ledger identifies the leading coefficient with , and Lemma A gives an integrable radial remainder . For the finite-cutoff identity, subtract the radial term in (eq:UV) from (eq:rawsplit). The exact error is the sum of and

The first difference is by Lemma lem:S. For (eq:errorfirst), Lemma lem:replacement and

give the bound

It is the scalar multiplier that supplies this large- decay.

The scalar replacement is a separate identity and estimate:

The boundedness of the profiles and of therefore makes (eq:errorsecond) , since . All estimates use the same compact-test seminorm.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • VII-D@1#eq:UV · line 1564

  • VII-D@1#eq:Eerror · line 1574

  • VII-D@1#eq:errorfirst · line 1588

  • VII-D@1#eq:errorsecond · line 1588

  • VII-D@1#eq:scalarreplacement · line 1616

  • unlabeled · line 1603

  • unlabeled · line 1607