Manuscript VII-D@1 · VII-D.tex · ef67c89c
Finite part of the regulated Cauchy-reflection triangle A strong numerical distributional limit for the VII-C family
Proves a strong distributional finite part of one numerical reflection-triangle family, with an explicit real counterterm class. This is a subtraction prescription, not an algebra construction, and it does not remove the VII-C continuity obstruction. No compilation is asserted.
Front matter
abstractAbstractFront matter · lines 60–79
Open as its own pageFor the insertion-kernel regularization fixed in VII-C, we prove existence of the strong distributional finite part of its numerical reflection-triangle coefficient. The proof applies to arbitrary compact joint tests. An explicit normalization ledger identifies the leading reflected contribution with the prescribed light-ray residue, including its density and every Fourier factor. A joint spatial Fourier argument gives a regulator-independent ultraviolet decomposition: the radial coefficient differs from that residue by in a fixed finite-order distribution seminorm, and the remaining regulator-placement error is . The estimates retain the full phase and are uniform through the intersection of reflected collinearity with the first–third observation diagonal. For two admissible normalized radial mollifiers, the complete conversion is , with an explicit real coefficient, as a corollary of the ultraviolet decomposition. The result is a numerical subtraction prescription, not an algebra construction.
- figureA finite part is not the removed regulatorFront matter · VII-D@1#fig:scope-VII-D · lines 81–94Regulated triangle→Finite part at fixed scale→Regulator removedThe finite part is not the limit with the regulator removed.
A finite part is not the removed regulator. The three boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.
- figureA finite part is not the removed regulatorFront matter · VII-D@1#fig:split-VII-D · lines 96–107Regulated triangleRegulator removedThe finite part is not the limit with the regulator removed.
A finite part is not the removed regulator. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.
- figureReading downward is not a transferFront matter · VII-D@1#fig:chain-VII-D · lines 109–122Regulated triangle↓Finite part at fixed scale↓Regulator removedThe finite part is not the limit with the regulator removed.
Reading downward is not a transfer. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.
- figureRegulated triangle is not Regulator removedFront matter · VII-D@1#fig:pair-VII-D · lines 124–137Regulated trianglenot the same objectRegulator removedFinite part at fixed scale. The finite part is not the limit with the regulator removed.
Regulated triangle is not Regulator removed. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.
- figureThree statuses stay separateFront matter · VII-D@1#fig:gate-VII-D · lines 139–152Named: Regulated triangle→Used here: Finite part at fixed scale→Not claimed: Regulator removedThe finite part is not the limit with the regulator removed.
Three statuses stay separate. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.
sectionFront matterFront matter · lines 152–161
Open as its own pageFigure fig:split-VII-D records one view of the same separation. Figure fig:chain-VII-D records one view of the same separation. Figure fig:pair-VII-D records one view of the same separation. Figure fig:gate-VII-D records one view of the same separation. The drawings add no hypothesis.
Figure fig:scope-VII-D records that separation. The drawing adds no hypothesis.
Scope and fixed data
sectionScope and fixed dataScope and fixed data · lines 162–197
Open as its own pageLet , , and . We ask whether
exists strongly in , with the counterterm class fixed to
The family is precisely the numerical VII-C family: both slots of each insertion are regularized with the same fixed mollifier , while the single middle observable is unsmeared.
The formulas on the following convention sheet are from
085T_Landmark_VIIC_v1.texVIIC. These displayed formulas define the family studied in this paper. The proof requires no companion methods manuscript and no unspecified normalization.We reserve for the subtraction scale and write for the mollifier profile denoted by in VII-C. The symbol denotes the middle test; is a time coordinate.
Source convention sheet
sectionSource convention sheetSource convention sheet · VII-D@1#sc:placement, VII-D@1#sc:covariance, VII-D@1#sc:K, VII-D@1#sc:spectral · lines 198–292
Open as its own page{Insertion and placement (
eq:B,eq:C,eq:Bepsin VII-C).}{Even covariance (
eq:Hhh,eq:Hscalar,eq:positive).}{Zero-Cauchy mode and mixed covariance (
eq:K).}The factors and are locally integrable in three momentum dimensions. No graviton positivity is assumed.
{Profiles and spectral identity (
eq:F,eq:spectral,lem:spectral).}There is one graph type. Its factor counts the assignments of the two middle legs. The middle observable is not regularized.
sectionSource convention sheetSource convention sheet · VII-D@1#sc:residue, VII-D@1#sc:off · lines 292–323
Open as its own page{Locked residue (
eq:ray,eq:residue,thm:log).}Here is ordinary surface area measure: .
{Off-shell identity (
eq:reconstruction).}The source is retained. Equation (sc:covariance) does not set a classical field to zero.
The exact distribution and intersection coordinates
sectionThe exact distribution and intersection coordinatesThe exact distribution and intersection coordinates · VII-D@1#eq:strongtemplate · lines 325–369
Open as its own pageWrite
The scalar mass and each admissible mollifier are fixed independently of .
Our Fourier convention is
The dot product in this convention is the coordinate pairing, not the Lorentzian metric pairing. Radiality of is Euclidean.
For a compact , let
Tests are extended by zero to the ambient Euclidean space when taking Fourier transforms. Their supports are separated from the boundary of .
All estimates below can be taken with the single test order . Its size is inessential; fixing it makes independence from the cutoff and the radial parameter explicit.
Strong convergence in means uniform convergence on bounded subsets of . A bounded subset of is contained and bounded in some fixed-support test space. Thus
on every compact implies strong convergence.
sectionPositive-cutoff definition and regulator placementThe exact distribution and intersection coordinates › Positive-cutoff definition and regulator placement · VII-D@1#eq:Deps · lines 370–381
Open as its own pageDefine
propositionProposition: Exact positive-cutoff distribution and placementThe exact distribution and intersection coordinates › Positive-cutoff definition and regulator placement · VII-D@1#prop:positive, VII-D@1#eq:Texact · proof attached · lines 382–467
Open as its own pageThe field regularization and the mixed-kernel convolution in (sc:placement) define the same insertion. Their numerical coefficient is
For every , this is a smooth function on , and
Its pairing on real product tests is exactly (sc:spectral).
Proof. and kernel convolution. For , transposition of convolution gives
Since is even, this is the kernel convolution displayed in (sc:placement). The identity holds on arbitrary smooth configurations: the original mixed kernel has compact support, and the convolution kernels are compactly supported.
-wave multiplier identities. The coefficients of are constant, so
for every smooth . For any constant tensor ,
This applies in particular to the de Donder polarizations in (sc:covariance). Applying the fixed operator to this equality retains the scalar multiplier . This proves the displayed formula for , without commuting through .
For the scalar leg, Euclidean radiality gives
The two scalar insertion slots therefore supply . The derivative factors are
multiplying the scalar spectral density gives (eq:Deps). The two insertion signs also multiply to . The middle observable is untouched.
and the product-test identity. For fixed positive , every coordinate derivative of the momentum integrands in and is integrable, locally uniformly in the observations. At zero momentum the only graviton denominators are and , locally integrable in three dimensions. The scalar density is locally integrable also for . At infinity the profiles provide arbitrary polynomial decay.
Thus (eq:Texact) is a product of smooth functions. Its compact-test bound follows by a supremum on a compact neighborhood of . Integrating against and using (eq:Deps) yields (sc:spectral).
sectionPositive-cutoff definition and regulator placementThe exact distribution and intersection coordinates › Positive-cutoff definition and regulator placement · lines 467–479
Open as its own pagetests. The distribution (eq:Texact) is complex-linear in its joint test. On complex product tests, the spectral factors are
The formula with alone applies to real . Kernel conjugation in (eq:Texact) does not conjugate the test.
sectionIntersection coordinatesThe exact distribution and intersection coordinates › Intersection coordinates · VII-D@1#eq:chart, VII-D@1#eq:chartrelations, VII-D@1#eq:density · lines 480–525
Open as its own pageOn , define
The chart domain has and . The inverse spatial formulas are
Consequently,
For fixed times, the linear transformation to has determinant of absolute value one. Replacing by is triangular with unit determinant. Polar coordinates in therefore give
The full transformation, including the times, has the same Jacobian because its time block is the identity. Replacing by has absolute Jacobian one. There is no geometric .
The locked residue
sectionThe locked residueThe locked residue · VII-D@1#eq:Psi, VII-D@1#eq:nu · lines 527–545
Open as its own pageLet
with coordinates , and set
definitionDefinition: Prescribed VII-C residueThe locked residue · VII-D@1#def:residue, VII-D@1#eq:rdef, VII-D@1#eq:rjoint · lines 546–566
Open as its own pageThe subtraction distribution is
Equivalently, for an arbitrary joint test,
sectionThe locked residueThe locked residue · VII-D@1#eq:rlocal · lines 566–605
Open as its own pageThe map is a proper embedding over compact subsets of . Its inverse on its image is given by the observation times and
On the preimage of a compact in , the time coordinates remain bounded and positive, the spatial coordinate is bounded, and . The preimage is closed in this bounded parameter region and hence compact.
It follows directly that is a positive order-zero distribution, with support exactly . Its product-test pairing is (sc:residue). The separated-support nonzero witness is already established in VII-C,
lem:separated.Relative to the ambient density (eq:density),
Indeed, multiplying this expression by and integrating in gives exactly (eq:rjoint). There is no in this measure.
If the same embedding and parameter density are written as , their normalization comparison is
This paper always subtracts (eq:rdef). The fact that the actual leading graph coefficient equals this prescribed distribution is proved in Proposition prop:ledger; it is not built into the definition of the radial family.
Joint Fourier estimates and convergent sectors
sectionThe joint spatial transformJoint Fourier estimates and convergent sectors › The joint spatial transform · VII-D@1#eq:jointFT, VII-D@1#eq:FTbound · lines 609–641
Open as its own pageFor fixed , define
This preserves all correlations of the joint test.
We shall use the fixed momentum-decay exponent . Applying under the integral gives
Only derivatives are needed for this estimate; order also accommodates the fixed localizations used below. The variables range over a fixed compact projection of .
lemmaLemma: Shifted momentum boundsJoint Fourier estimates and convergent sectors › The joint spatial transform · VII-D@1#lem:convolution, VII-D@1#eq:shiftbound, VII-D@1#eq:shifttail · proof attached · lines 642–689
Open as its own pageLet , , , , and . Then
The constants are uniform in . For , the first integral is uniformly bounded. In particular, all these assertions apply with .
Proof. On , the denominator is at least , and the remaining weight is integrable.
On , first consider . Here is comparable to , and
This part is bounded by . In the remaining part the denominator gives , while
This proves the tail bound. Since , the tail also satisfies the full-integral bound.
For , split into a fixed-size neighborhood of and its complement. Local integrability of treats the first region, and the fixed polynomial weight treats the second.
sectionThe joint spatial transformJoint Fourier estimates and convergent sectors › The joint spatial transform · lines 689–695
Open as its own page. These bounds include all momentum ratios and all directions. They use no time separation, regulator decay, or angular stationary-phase hypothesis.
sectionExact branch integralsJoint Fourier estimates and convergent sectors › Exact branch integrals · VII-D@1#eq:substitution, VII-D@1#eq:Qbranches, VII-D@1#eq:jointbranches · lines 696–755
Open as its own pageSet
Throughout the momentum calculation we use the single substitution
For , define
For , the two profile factors are replaced by one. For each fixed , the integral is absolutely convergent after taking the joint spatial transform.
The exact positive-cutoff identity is
The spatial signs follow from
Define by taking all four branches in (eq:jointbranches) on , and only on . Define by the same prescription with all multipliers replaced by one. The high- integrals defining are understood after performing the compact time integrations in (eq:Qbranches).
lemmaLemma: Low-frequency and direct sectorsJoint Fourier estimates and convergent sectors › Exact branch integrals · VII-D@1#lem:S, VII-D@1#eq:Srate, VII-D@1#eq:multdifference · proof attached · lines 756–814
Open as its own pageThe distribution exists, is independent of , and satisfies
Proof. The profiles are bounded and globally Lipschitz, with value one at zero. Telescoping the product of multipliers gives
For , (eq:FTbound) and the bounded- part of Lemma lem:convolution give an integrable bound. The extra powers in (eq:multdifference) are harmless: and . Thus this sector has a cutoff-free limit with error.
For , suppose the left branch is direct. Its -frequency is . Integrating eight times by parts in gains
The amplitude is at most linear in ; its differentiated coefficients are still bounded by . The other amplitude is bounded by . If only the right branch is direct, use instead.
The shifted bounds show that the two momentum integrations contribute at most . Since , the unregulated radial majorant is . For the regulated difference,
and (eq:multdifference) costs at most after the weighted integrations. The resulting radial majorant is . Both are integrable.
All integrations by parts are performed against the full compact joint test. No restriction to an observation diagonal is used.
sectionExact branch integralsJoint Fourier estimates and convergent sectors › Exact branch integrals · lines 814–822
Open as its own page. This lemma holds on every compact in , including ordinary diagonals and the reflected intersection. It covers bounded scalar momentum and every sector with a direct branch. The test order is , independent of ; the error is , without a lower bound on .
The reflected radial family: normalization and Lemma A
sectionThe reflected radial family: normalization and Lemma AThe reflected radial family: normalization and Lemma A · VII-D@1#eq:Aintrinsic, VII-D@1#eq:Aepsintrinsic, VII-D@1#eq:rawsplit · lines 824–864
Open as its own pageFor , , set
in accordance with (eq:substitution).
The radial families are defined intrinsically from the exact branch integrals:
No residue constant has been inserted in these definitions. They give the exact decomposition
The use of as the radial integration variable is distinct from its use for the fixed residue distribution. In expressions such as , the second term is the distribution (eq:rdef).
propositionProposition: Normalization ledgerThe reflected radial family: normalization and Lemma A › Normalization ledger · VII-D@1#prop:ledger, VII-D@1#ledger:1, VII-D@1#ledger:2, VII-D@1#ledger:3, VII-D@1#ledger:4, VII-D@1#ledger:5, VII-D@1#ledger:6, VII-D@1#eq:ledgerconclusion · proof attached · lines 867–1006
Open as its own pageThe leading reflected–reflected radial coefficient derived from (eq:Aintrinsic) equals the prescribed distribution (eq:rdef) on all joint tests. In particular, its constant is , with the parameter density in (eq:nu).
Proof. The calculation is recorded in six identities.
1: exact pointwise kernel. Proposition prop:positive gives
2: reflected amplitudes and conjugation. The reflected terms of the two mixed covariances have amplitudes
The corresponding time phases are, separately, and . The right spatial phase is . These are conjugations of the kernel, not of .
3: scalar density. The scalar factor is
4: combined numerical prefactor. Consequently the reflected–reflected integrand has prefactor
The assignment factor in L1 has now been exhausted. No further factor of two occurs in .
5: polar measure and radial normalization. With ordinary sphere area measure,
This explains the extra in (eq:Aintrinsic), rather than adding a normalization by hand.
6: translation and Fourier inversion. For fixed , (eq:substitution) is a translation and has Jacobian one. The two mixed-covariance measures become exactly . The Fourier inversion identity is
In particular, the two factors supplied by the mixed covariances are the normalization of the two Fourier inversions. They cancel the factors from the unnormalized Fourier delta identities; they are not canceled a second time against another Fourier measure.
For the leading coefficient, replace the amplitude factors by and by . In the phase, however, retain the first-order expansions
Substituting into the phase itself would be incorrect. The retained time phase is exactly the inversion phase in L6.
The only remaining numerical factor is therefore
After L6, the remaining measure is . Changing to has unit Jacobian, so this is precisely the pushforward density (eq:nu). We have proved
The cutoff factors have not been used in this leading identification. They are treated by the replacement estimate below. Direct-branch amplitudes do not enter this calculation.
sectionNormalization ledgerThe reflected radial family: normalization and Lemma A › Normalization ledger · VII-D@1#eq:Adef · lines 1006–1025
Open as its own pageAs a consequence of the ledger, the intrinsic definition (eq:Aintrinsic) can now be written
The formula for has the two additional factors .
lemmaLemma: Joint-test radial asymptotic: Lemma AThe reflected radial family: normalization and Lemma A › Lemma A: exact phase and complete error budget · VII-D@1#lem:A, VII-D@1#eq:Ar, VII-D@1#eq:timephase, VII-D@1#eq:intersectionphase, VII-D@1#eq:Icentral, VII-D@1#eq:EPdef, VII-D@1#eq:EdeltaDef, VII-D@1#eq:EomegaDef, VII-D@1#eq:taildefs, VII-D@1#eq:exacterroridentity, VII-D@1#eq:Acentralexact, VII-D@1#eq:Icentralexact, VII-D@1#eq:budgetidentity, VII-D@1#eq:amplitudeerror, VII-D@1#eq:EPbound, VII-D@1#eq:deltaexact, VII-D@1#eq:EdeltaBound, VII-D@1#eq:massbounds, VII-D@1#eq:dmass, VII-D@1#eq:EomegaBound, VII-D@1#eq:actualtail, VII-D@1#eq:tailbudget · proof attached · lines 1028–1364
Open as its own pageFor every compact ,
In particular,
The estimate holds without a positive lower bound on .
Proof. We retain the exact phase, form an exact difference, and only then estimate its terms.
1. Exact phase. Set
The temporal phase in (eq:Adef) is exactly
Before the spatial integration defining , the exact full phase in the incidence chart is
Thus both angular variables and all of are retained. The phase is the leading temporal phase in Cartesian Fourier space; the spatial phase is already inside . One does not delete the first line of (eq:intersectionphase) in an incidence-coordinate integral.
2. Exact central–tail decomposition. Let
and abbreviate, within this proof,
All integrals over or its complement below include the remaining variables, with measure
Write at its full arguments from (eq:jointFT). Define
These definitions precede all absolute-value estimates. The algebraic identity behind them is
Consequently,
The second equality is the full Fourier inversion proved in the ledger, minus its leading tail. In particular, the central leading term is not counted again after subtracting . With
the exact difference is
{3. Amplitude error .} On ,
The corresponding bound holds for . Since each ratio is bounded by ,
Also for . Using (eq:FTbound) in (eq:EPdef) gives
{4. Quadratic phase error .} For , the exact identity
The denominator is at least in this region. On a compact observation set, have fixed upper bounds. Therefore
Applying to the exact difference in (eq:EdeltaDef), and then (eq:FTbound), yields
No expansion of is made in the tail.
{5. Mass and time-difference error .} The two relevant bounds are
The exact factor in (eq:EomegaDef) splits as
In particular,
Only an upper bound on over the compact observation projection is used. At , this phase error vanishes exactly. Equations (eq:FTbound) and (eq:massbounds)–(eq:dmass) give
This is the required estimate through ; it does not use division by .
{6. Exact tail .} Let . The union bound for , together with (eq:shiftbound)–(eq:shifttail) for , gives the complete majorant
Here the prefactor bound is . The shifted-tail exponent is , whereas the full shifted integral is bounded by .
This estimate includes and , which occur in the shifted tails. Those singularities are treated by local integrability, not by a phase expansion.
For the leading tail there are no shifted denominators. Directly,
and similarly for . Hence
{7. Coordinate change: .} The estimate has been proved in Cartesian Fourier space. On a fixed incidence-coordinate patch, rewriting the same distribution with (eq:chart) introduces exactly the density (eq:density) and the phase (eq:intersectionphase). It introduces no additional error:
For a direct justification, first insert compact smooth cutoffs in . The remaining momentum singularities are locally integrable, so the ordinary coordinate change is legitimate. Remove those auxiliary cutoffs after the spatial integration defining ; (eq:FTbound) and Lemma lem:convolution justify that limit. This identifies the coordinate expression with the original distribution, without restricting it to a diagonal. The Jacobian has no .
8. Sum of the errors. The complete budget is
Summing in (eq:budgetidentity) proves (eq:Ar). The uniform bound on follows because is an order-zero distribution.
sectionLemma A: exact phase and complete error budgetThe reflected radial family: normalization and Lemma A › Lemma A: exact phase and complete error budget · lines 1364–1380
Open as its own page. Lemma A holds on every compact of , with test order , independently of the regulator. The proof covers the comparable central sector and all noncomparable shifted tails, uniformly in the momentum direction. It uses only upper bounds on . Thus it applies unchanged on neighborhoods of .
The estimate is an equality and bound on all joint tests. In particular, an additional order- contribution proportional to , a normal derivative of the residue, or any other nonzero distribution could not be hidden in its error: it would contradict (eq:Ar) on a test detecting that distribution.
Replacement and the complete ultraviolet split
lemmaLemma: Insertion-regulator replacementReplacement and the complete ultraviolet split › Replacement of the two graviton multipliers · VII-D@1#lem:replacement, VII-D@1#eq:Aregerror, VII-D@1#eq:multtelescoping, VII-D@1#eq:meanvalueexact, VII-D@1#eq:replacementexact, VII-D@1#eq:multLipschitz, VII-D@1#eq:replacementcentral, VII-D@1#eq:replacementtail · proof attached · lines 1386–1547
Open as its own pageFor every compact ,
Only boundedness and a global Lipschitz bound for are needed for this estimate.
Proof. 1. Exact multiplier difference. Before taking absolute values, use the identity
Each difference has the exact integral remainder
and likewise with .
Using the phase notation from the proof of Lemma A, inserting the left-hand side of (eq:multtelescoping) into (eq:Adef) gives exactly
Here the phase is the same exact phase used in Lemma A. No approximation of it is made.
Since
equations (eq:multtelescoping)–(eq:meanvalueexact) imply
This uses no decay when or is small.
2. Central region. On the region of Lemma A, . Taking absolute values in the already formed difference (eq:replacementexact) gives
{3. Shifted tails, including .} Use the same complement as in Lemma A, and retain . For the -tail, apply (eq:shifttail) to the -integral and (eq:shiftbound) to the full -integral. The extra momentum factor is absorbed using or . The following table records the parameters of those two estimates. Every row includes the prefactor ; the common factor is suppressed.
{}1.25
Extra factor -tail: and bound Full : and bound Radial majorant Indeed, the tail powers are and . The full-integral estimate with still gives , since ; no additional power of is lost there. The -tail has the same two bounds after interchanging and . The union bound therefore yields
The shifted-tail bounds include the locally integrable singularities at and . Combining (eq:replacementcentral) and (eq:replacementtail) proves the claim.
sectionReplacement of the two graviton multipliersReplacement and the complete ultraviolet split › Replacement of the two graviton multipliers · lines 1547–1558
Open as its own page. The replacement estimate holds on all of , including , with order , uniformly in . Its central error is , and its tail is . No small-argument decay of a graviton multiplier is used. The estimate does not replace any multiplier in the direct-sector distribution , and it does not yet replace the scalar multiplier .
propositionProposition: Regulator-independent ultraviolet decompositionReplacement and the complete ultraviolet split › The ultraviolet decomposition · VII-D@1#prop:UV, VII-D@1#eq:UV, VII-D@1#eq:Eerror, VII-D@1#eq:errorfirst, VII-D@1#eq:errorsecond, VII-D@1#eq:scalarreplacement · proof attached · lines 1561–1631
Open as its own pageThe exact family has the decomposition
where are independent of , and
Proof. The ledger identifies the leading coefficient with , and Lemma A gives an integrable radial remainder . For the finite-cutoff identity, subtract the radial term in (eq:UV) from (eq:rawsplit). The exact error is the sum of and
The first difference is by Lemma lem:S. For (eq:errorfirst), Lemma lem:replacement and
give the bound
It is the scalar multiplier that supplies this large- decay.
The scalar replacement is a separate identity and estimate:
The boundedness of the profiles and of therefore makes (eq:errorsecond) , since . All estimates use the same compact-test seminorm.
Intersection and sector audit
sectionThe full intersection pairingIntersection and sector audit › The full intersection pairing · VII-D@1#eq:intersectionpairing · lines 1636–1672
Open as its own pageFor a test supported in an incidence-coordinate patch, the exact pairing corresponding to (eq:Adef) is
where and is (eq:intersectionphase). The oscillatory notation means the Cartesian-Fourier distribution (eq:Adef) rewritten by the cutoff-and-coordinate procedure in Lemma A. It is not a new product of singular distributions.
The leading Fourier inversion imposes
Only after that inversion may one conclude
The positive radius , not , determines the first angular constraint. Neither this identification nor its density requires division by .
sectionNormal jets as a consequence, not a second proofIntersection and sector audit › Normal jets as a consequence, not a second proof · lines 1673–1690
Open as its own pageOn a fixed patch, write , and let denote all tangential variables, including . A fixed local cutoff and the integral Taylor formula give
with smooth compactly supported and finite-order seminorm bounds on a slightly larger patch. The residue kills the normal-vanishing terms. Lemma A already controls those terms and the trace term uniformly through . This observation does not restrict to the relation and is not used as an alternative proof of the radial estimate.
sectionObservation coverageIntersection and sector audit › Observation coverage · lines 1691–1725
Open as its own pageThe estimates are global in the Cartesian observation variables, so they cover the following regions.
Off , the residue vanishes on supported tests. Equations (eq:UV) and (eq:Ar) then give convergence without a logarithmic subtraction.
Near , the same estimates apply without using a lower bound on .
Near , the exact phase and density are (eq:intersectionphase) and (eq:density). The mass-phase bound (eq:dmass) is uniform through .
The remaining ordinary diagonals and the region , where the incidence chart is unavailable, are covered by the Cartesian Fourier argument. Moreover, in , because the corresponding reflected spatial distances are and .
These are assertions on joint tests supported in open observation neighborhoods, not tests confined to positive-codimension strata. A finite smooth partition on any compact gives the corresponding regional estimates with the same test order.
sectionIntegration-sector coverageIntersection and sector audit › Integration-sector coverage · lines 1726–1777
Open as its own page{}1.14
Sector Controlling calculation All frequencies large and comparable The normalization ledger and the central errors . Only a proper subset large Bounded belongs to Lemma lem:S. For large , a small graviton momentum forces a shifted tail, covered by (eq:shifttail). Ratios tending to zero or infinity The shifted-tail bounds include both limits and , with their locally integrable denominators. A direct branch present Time integration by parts in a frequency or , independently of . Angular degeneracy Uniform estimates on , not angular stationary phase. The two directions in are kept distinct. A graviton cutoff argument tends to zero The exact telescoping and mean-value identities (eq:multtelescoping)–(eq:meanvalueexact); only boundedness and Lipschitz continuity are used. Bounded frequencies The common distribution , with convergence. The partitions at and are independent of . No derivative of a cutoff-dependent partition is omitted.
audit. This numerical subtraction leaves the VII-C coefficient-continuity obstruction under its stated normal-topology hypotheses unchanged VIIC (
thm:coefficient).
Strong finite part and dyadic certificates
sectionStrong finite part and dyadic certificatesStrong finite part and dyadic certificates · VII-D@1#eq:kappa, VII-D@1#eq:Ucommon · lines 1779–1809
Open as its own pageDefine the real profile constant
The profile is real, even, Schwartz, and equals one at zero. Hence , and both integrals converge.
Define the common distribution
This integral is defined by its joint-test pairings. They are measurable in , and Lemma A gives the integrable bound
Thus (eq:Ucommon) defines a continuous distribution. Its finite radial truncations converge strongly, with tail at most above radius .
theoremTheorem: Strong finite part with quantitative remainderStrong finite part and dyadic certificates · VII-D@1#thm:finitepart, VII-D@1#eq:finitepart, VII-D@1#eq:finalrate, VII-D@1#eq:subtracteddecomp, VII-D@1#eq:scalarfinite · proof attached · lines 1810–1886
Open as its own pageFor every admissible fixed mollifier and every ,
is the strong distributional limit
More precisely,
The estimate includes compacts meeting .
Proof. The ultraviolet decomposition gives
Changing variables in the scalar radial integral gives
Furthermore,
Lemma A therefore bounds the difference between the first radial integral in (eq:subtracteddecomp) and the integral in (eq:Ucommon) by
Together with (eq:Eerror) and (eq:scalarfinite), this proves (eq:finitepart)–(eq:finalrate). The compact-test estimate implies uniform convergence on every bounded subset of .
sectionShell and within-shell boundsStrong finite part and dyadic certificates › Shell and within-shell bounds · VII-D@1#eq:dyadicE, VII-D@1#eq:dyadicJ · lines 1888–1903
Open as its own pageLet , , and define
The positive-cutoff integrals are continuous in the cutoff, locally uniformly on bounded sets of tests, so is continuous in .
corollaryCorollary: Summable shell certificateStrong finite part and dyadic certificates › Shell and within-shell bounds · VII-D@1#cor:shell, VII-D@1#eq:shellbounds · proof attached · lines 1904–1926
Open as its own pageFor every compact ,
where one may take
In particular, and .
Proof. Apply (eq:finalrate) with to the two terms in each difference. For the within-shell estimate, , so the bound is uniform in .
sectionShell and within-shell boundsStrong finite part and dyadic certificates › Shell and within-shell bounds · lines 1926–1937
Open as its own pagecertificate. Localizing by any fixed smooth partition from Section sec:audit preserves the order . On each of its four observation regions, the shell and within-shell bounds are therefore . The constants may depend on the localization but not on . For intersection neighborhoods they require no condition .
Complete conversion and the real counterterm class
sectionComplete conversion and the real counterterm classComplete conversion and the real counterterm class · lines 1939–1944
Open as its own pageLet be two admissible fixed mollifiers. Each is used on both slots of both insertions, as prescribed on the convention sheet.
theoremTheorem: Complete regulator conversionComplete conversion and the real counterterm class · VII-D@1#thm:conversion, VII-D@1#eq:conversion · proof attached · lines 1945–1985
Open as its own pageThe difference has the strong limit
For every common scale ,
This is the complete conversion distribution: no further normal derivative, nonconstant weight on , or additional term supported on occurs.
Proof. The distribution in (eq:finitepart) is independent of the profile. Hence
Combining the two integrals in (eq:kappa) gives the convergent integral in (eq:conversion). It is real because both profiles are real.
Applying (eq:finalrate) to both regulators proves strong convergence of their complete difference on all joint tests. This leaves no distribution on a smaller observation stratum undetected.
sectionPerpendicular and reality checksComplete conversion and the real counterterm class › Perpendicular and reality checks · lines 1987–2005
Open as its own pageChoose a real compact test with . Such a test exists since is a nonzero positive distribution. Then
Thus both conditions for the prescribed real class are checked. The weighted-pushforward representation is completely identified:
Its weight is constant, as a consequence of the full conversion limit rather than only the leading logarithmic coefficient.
sectionAdjoint symmetryComplete conversion and the real counterterm class › Adjoint symmetry · lines 2006–2031
Open as its own pageLet , and define
The real multiplier in (eq:Deps) implies
Together with (eq:Texact), this gives
The residue is real and invariant under , by interchanging in (eq:rjoint). Strong passage to the limit gives
These symmetries have been proved directly; they are not used as an assumption replacing the reality calculation.
sectionReference profile, dilation, and cocycleComplete conversion and the real counterterm class › Reference profile, dilation, and cocycle · lines 2032–2070
Open as its own pageFix one admissible reference mollifier . Then
In particular,
If
then the original insertion regularizations give the exact finite-cutoff identity
Changing variables in (eq:kappa) yields
The subtraction-scale dependence is likewise
Closed numerical statement
theoremTheorem: Finite part for the prescribed VII-C familyClosed numerical statement · VII-D@1#thm:main · proof attached · lines 2074–2135
Open as its own pageFix the convention-sheet data, a mass , and the class of real, nonnegative, even, normalized, Euclidean-radial compact mollifiers. Use one fixed mollifier on both slots of each insertion, and keep the middle observable unsmeared.
Then:
For each , the numerical family is the smooth distribution (eq:Texact), with the prescribed product-test pairings.
The leading reflected coefficient, including its density, is exactly
It is obtained from the exact branch integral by the normalization ledger, not imposed on that integral.
For every , the prescribed subtracted family has a strong limit in , with the fixed-order estimate (eq:finalrate). This includes the full reflected-diagonal intersection.
The regulator-independent ultraviolet decomposition is (eq:UV). Its radial and regulator-placement errors satisfy
For any two admissible mollifiers, the complete conversion is (eq:conversion). In particular, and . The fixed class suffices.
These conclusions concern only the numerical prescription defined in this paper.
Proof. Proposition prop:positive proves (i). Proposition prop:ledger proves (ii) as an equality on arbitrary joint tests. Lemma lem:S, Lemma A, and Lemma lem:replacement give the ultraviolet decomposition and its uniform error estimates. Theorem thm:finitepart proves (iii), while Section sec:audit records the observation and momentum coverage. Theorem thm:conversion proves (v).
bibliographyReferencesClosed numerical statement · lines 2137–2153
Open as its own pageVIIC
Landmark VII-C: A mixed-Wick obstruction to a normal-topology boundary extension for sharp Cauchy harmonic insertions. Manuscript source
085T_Landmark_VIIC_v1.tex. The source labels used here includeeq:B,eq:C,eq:Hhh,eq:Hscalar,eq:positive,eq:K,eq:Beps,eq:reconstruction,lem:spectral,thm:log,eq:residue,lem:separated, andthm:coefficient.